- SAP has created a hierarchy, which those in the SAP ecosystem are compelled to follow.
- This ensures that information provided by SAP is unquestioned.
The unrelenting nature of hierarchy is exceptionally well explored in the following quotation in a book I recently rediscovered.
“Social ladders exist precisely to keep you where you are. Thanks to them, everyone knows his place. Hens, for example, have a pecking order. The No. 1 hen can easily be spotted: she’s the only one no other hen pecks. But she does peck the others. Nos. 2, 3 and 4, and so on, down the line. A hen halfway down the hierarchy. No. 50 say, gets pecked by Nos. 1 to 49 and herself pecks Nos. 51 to 100. At least, it could work this way. But if a hen were really to peck all the other hends below here, she’d have no time to lay her eggs. A No. 1 hen that pecks all the other hends in the coop would soon be too tired to stay at the top. In reality, hen No. 1 only pecks those directly below her, and then No. 35 just worries about her immediate neighbors. Thanks to the ladder, you only need to worry about the rungs within reach; ladders exist precisely so that you can take small steps, not big ones. Such a system guarantees the stability of the group. Biologically speaking, the rungs of the hierarchy aren’t meant as steps upwards for the ambitious individual, but for the welfare of the whole group. Everyone should be happy, and is, except for the lowest rung. Because that’s the good part about this system: almost everyone, however many bosses he has above him, is himself the boss over others below him. Even if you’re only No. 95, you still have a higher status that Nos. 96, 97, 98, 99 and 100 – a status worth keeping — which is why Mr. Smith meekly accepts his boss’s harsh words. A ruler doesn’t need to divide in order to rule, the subjected divide themselves.” – The Way of All Flesh
Hierarchy in Technology
What can be surprising is that while information technology often seems like a relatively evolved space from the outside, the reality from inside often looks much different.
“In Accidental Empires, his classic book on the rise of PCs, Robert X. Cringely described Microsoft’s software management style when Bill Gates was in charge as a system where “Each level, from Gates on down, screams at the next, goading and humiliating them.” Ah, yes, that’s the Microsoft I knew and hated.
The difference between the leaders at big proprietary software companies and Torvalds is that he says everything in the open for the whole world to see. The others do it in private conference rooms. I’ve heard people claim that Torvalds would be fired in their company. Nope. He’d be right where he is now: on top of his programming world.”
How Hierarchy is an Integral Component to SAP and its Ecosystem
I debate a lot of SAP consultants and have I have been doing it for years. Even though my article covers technical topics, who are the most aggressive SAP consultants who debate me? It is illuminating because it is not technical SAP resources. Instead, it is SAP project managers, often self-described “project advisors.” That the resources furthest away from the technology. Furthest away from what is real. And there is something else that they bring along with their arguments, which is a sense of shock and bewilderment that I would critique what SAP has to say.
And there is a good reason for this.
To a project manager, there is a specific hierarchy that is to be respected. They see themselves as at the top of one of these hierarchies (that is they can peck all the hens at least on their own project). They may not be that high in the SAP hierarchy, but they still want to protect their place in the hierarchy that they have. They also know their place in the hierarchy. If a senior member from SAP appears on their project, or they meet them at TechEd, they know it is their role to genuflect and to become as close to them as possible. Whether one works for Accenture, IBM, SAP, ASUG, or any other related entity, the only way to do well in one’s career is to respect the hierarchy. And this respect means repeating false information from on high. Information delivered from on high is true, information that questions the information from on high must be false. It is a simple mechanism that removes all thought. There is little choice given to people.
Media Entities Questioning the Orthodoxy?
The media entities, which are ostensibly supposed to not respect this hierarchy end up also supporting the hierarchy as money flows from SAP (and other powerful entities) to the media entities. The objective is to make the hierarchy so all-encompassing that a rigid top-down control is enforced throughout the ecosystem.
Big monied interests don’t like independent media, they either want to own it (Salesforce recently purchased Time Magazine, AWS owns the Washinton Post), or control it. Independent media threatens the creation of a self-reinforcing echo chamber. This disdain for independent information is clear when one studies the topic of “corporate communications” which is how hierarchies propagandize their own employees by feeding them a steady stream of biased information right to their inboxes.
This is a map of a location where all of the undisputed information comes from. Information from this location is unassailable and no one outside of the hierarchy is to question it. This is a map of Waldorf, which is SAP’s headquarters……Or is it?
Life in the SAP Kingdom
In the SAP Kingdom, information (pure truth) flows from the mouths of the top of the hierarchy. The “excellent sources of information,” or the providers of the cannon are Bill McDermott, Hasso Plattner, the SAP website, and the role of those in the SAP ecosystem is to agree with the revealed wisdom. The SAP consulting partners have demonstrated they will repeat absolutely anything SAP says, no matter how false. And unless a person has a similar level in the hierarchy, they are not to question this wisdom.
When Bill McDermott says that HANA runs 100,000 times faster than any other technology, while absurd, the SAP consultant knows very well to avert their eyes. The ability to propose ridiculous things, and to not be criticized is the embodiment of abusive power. But why limit the analysis of how power is abused to the software industry, in the subject of the abuse of power there is such a rich tapestry of examples to choose from.
It is curious about reading the website of Saudi Arabia’s 2030 vision website. The writing is essentially similar to SAP’s website. Did they use the same PR firm? We don’t know.
Within Saudi Arabia, it is important that one repeats whatever King Salman Bin Abdulaziz Al-Saud and Mohammed Bin Salman say. But the SAP ecosystem is not so repressive as and controlling in thought and as unaccepting of contradictory viewpoints as the one of the most repressive regimes on the planet.
Of course not. First, the clothing is entirely different. Pictures here these men at the top of the hierarchy wear a thobe with a bisht and then a headdress. People in the SAP ecosystem normally wear slacks and a button-down shirt.
Also, while being “Custodian of the Two Holy Mosques” is pretty good, being the “Custodian of in-memory computing” is actually much better.
Hierarchies that cannot be questioned are a primary way that falsehoods are promulgated in societies. This hierarchy ensures that the most corrupt at the tippy top of the hierarchy are not held to account for their frequently false statements. This particularly true of any individual within the hierarchy (who risks losing their job and their position in the hierarchy) by observing the obvious fact that the emperor often has no clothes. But it extends to outward from the “official” hierarchy to entities associated with the first hierarchy.
The coercive ability and lack of accountability of any hierarchy can be tested by how willing those that are part of the hierarchy can question, and publicly question, obviously false statements from the top of the hierarchy.
Financial Bias Disclosure
Neither this article nor any other article on the Brightwork website is paid for by a software vendor, including Oracle, SAP or their competitors. As part of our commitment to publishing independent, unbiased research; no paid media placements, commissions or incentives of any nature are allowed.
Search Our Other SAP Content
Bill Gates deserves to be at the top of the hierarchy…..or did he? Where did DOS come from? What happens if Gary Kildall had not taken that plane trip that day?
Enterprise Software Risk Book
Rethinking Enterprise Software Risk: Controlling the Main Risk Factors on IT Projects
Better Managing Software Risk
The software implementation is risky business and success is not a certainty. But you can reduce risk with the strategies in this book. Undertaking software selection and implementation without approximating the project’s risk is a poor way to make decisions about either projects or software. But that’s the way many companies do business, even though 50 percent of IT implementations are deemed failures.
Finding What Works and What Doesn’t
In this book, you will review the strategies commonly used by most companies for mitigating software project risk–and learn why these plans don’t work–and then acquire practical and realistic strategies that will help you to maximize success on your software implementation.
Chapter 1: Introduction
Chapter 2: Enterprise Software Risk Management
Chapter 3: The Basics of Enterprise Software Risk Management
Chapter 4: Understanding the Enterprise Software Market
Chapter 5: Software Sell-ability versus Implementability
Chapter 6: Selecting the Right IT Consultant
Chapter 7: How to Use the Reports of Analysts Like Gartner
Chapter 8: How to Interpret Vendor-Provided Information to Reduce Project Risk
Chapter 9: Evaluating Implementation Preparedness
Chapter 10: Using TCO for Decision Making
Chapter 11: The Software Decisions’ Risk Component Model
Enterprise Software Risk
See our free project risk estimators that are available per application. The provide a method of risk analysis that is not available from other sources.