- For years SAP has stated that ERP would be the last system a customer would have to purchase.
- In this article, we review the accuracy of this claim.
Video Introduction: What SAP Said About SAP ERP Being the Last System a Customer Would Purchase
Text Introduction (Skip if You Watched the Video)
What is now mostly forgotten is that SAP marketed its ERP system because it would be the last system that a customer would need to purchase. This was presented all the way initially back in the 1980s, back when buyers knew very little about ERP systems, and ERP vendors could say just about anything and get away with it. The concept was that companies that had mostly custom-developed their systems could lower their maintenance and integration overhead by using a “single system,” which would be the ERP system. SAP proposed that all functionality the prospect would never need was baked into SAP, and all current systems in the prospect could be decommissioned. You will learn how accurate SAP and other ERP vendors were in ERP systems being the last system companies would ever purchase.
Our References for This Article
If you want to see our references for this article and other related Brightwork articles, see this link.
Lack of Financial Bias Notice: We have no financial ties to SAP or any other entity mentioned in this article.
- This is published by a research entity.
- Second, no one paid for this article to be written, and it is not pretending to inform you while being rigged to sell you software or consulting services. Unlike nearly every other article you will find from Google on this topic, it has had no input from any company's marketing or sales department.
SAP ERP Reduced Sprawl?
The proposal was that SAP ERP significantly reduced sprawl. This is explained in the following quotation from SAP Nation 2.0.
“SAP’s runaway success in the 90s came about because its R/3 product dramatically reduced enterprise sprawl. As Paul Melchiorre one of its most successful salespeople had noted in SAP Nation: “It was a truly transformation time for the technology industry. We replaced thousands of departmental and mainframe systems. We put MSA, M&D, and others out of business. We didn’t really have much competition. In deals it would be SAP v. SAP v. SAP — that is, SAP/Accenture, v. SAP/KPMG v. SAP/PwC.””
This quotation from a salesperson made a lot of money promoting this assumption, but as the quote is from a salesperson, it is highly suspect. Let us look at a related quotation.
“According to Panaya, a tool vendor “more than 50% of SAP shops have 40+ satellite applications. Of these less than 10 are SAP applications. CAST Research Labs has analyzed customizations at several major SAP customers and found most of the customizations were sizable, with many of them high-risk, according to its benchmarks.”
Is this reducing sprawl? Why does SAP have so many applications connected to it if it were the last application a company would buy, as claimed in an uncountable number of sales presentations?
The Truth About SAP ERP Being the Last System a Customer Would Purchase?
As covered in the book The Real Story Behind ERP: Separating Fiction from Reality, ERP was not the “last system a company would have to purchase. After SAP had sold in a vast number of accounts in the 1990s, they began developing other applications to connect to the ERP system. If one looks at a solution architectural Visio diagram, they are more complicated than they were in the 1980s, which ERP systems were supposed to eliminate.
Conclusion and Calculation
SAP receives a 0% accuracy rating for the SAP ERP Being the Last System a Customer Would Purchase.
Link to the Parent Article
This is one of many research articles on a specific topic that supports a larger research calculation. For the overview of the research calculation for all of the SAP topics that were part of the study, see the following primary research A Study into SAP’s Accuracy.