Last Updated on December 17, 2021 by Shaun Snapp
- IU was introduced by the pharmaceutical companies, but with an intent that is not acknowledged, which is to make supplementation levels seem much higher.
Pharmaceutical companies and the medical establishment have a long history of diminishing natural substances. And this is the introduction of the International Units or IUs.
Our References for This Article
If you want to see our references for this article and related Brightwork articles, visit this link.
When IUs Were Introduced
Supplements like Vitamin D have been and continue to be a problem for pharmaceutical companies. They are very inexpensive but are highly effective in preventing health problems. Therefore, the medical establishment needed to do something to scare the population away from taking them.
20 mg’s of Vitamin D in the 1920’s becomes 1,000,000 IU’s in the 1930’s IU is just a standard drug measurement like an inch is to length…it stands for International Units and means nothing more -later (after the first edition of this book) I learned that supposedly IU’s were invented by Big Pharma to confuse the public to prevent them from taking high dose Vitamin D3 instead of Big Pharma’s expensive drugs (20 mg’s of D3 = 1,000,000 IU’s! )– Bowles, Jeff T.
Reducing the Dosage to Try to Undermine the Supplement
Another common strategy of pharmaceutical companies is to run studies with dosage levels that are too low to have an impact, and then report that the supplement is ineffective. A case study of this is explained in the following quotation.
Later note- a recent study was publicized on the news suggesting that Vitamin D3 supplementation (very low dose) with calcium did not help women with osteoporosis-just as my theory would predict. However they did not use a high dose so maybe the dosing was the problem. Until higher D3 dose studies are done, I am extremely comfortable saying I am right. They also suggested the calcium supplements caused an increase in heart disease due to calcification. I am sure they did not give these women vitamin K2 to keep the calcium in their bones and out of their blood, veins and soft tissues! Their final advice from the study was a criminally negligent ”Do not take Vitamin D3 for osteoporosis”-and completely ignoring the multitude of beneficial effects that D3 has on everything else! I saw a recent suggestion from someone that this misinformation- study was put out as a first step in trying to outlaw Vitamin D3 by Big Pharma! – Bowles, Jeff T.
The listing of underhanded tactics on the part of pharmaceutical companies and their puppets the health authorities to diminish natural substances seems unlimited. They appear to think they have the right to tell any lie in order to undermine things that would reduce the incidence of the population from needing health care services.