The Evidence that Dr Fauci is Unscientific and Constantly Lying

Executive Summary

  • Dr. Fauci has repeatedly lied during the coronavirus pandemic and has a history of lying going back decades.


Fauci has been exposed during the coronavirus for repeatedly lying. However, Fauci has a history of lying that goes back decades. Fauci works in science, but his behavior and thought pattern are not scientific.

Our References for This Article

If you want to see our references for this article and related Brightwork articles, visit this link.

Dr Fauci’s Background

Dr. Anthony Fauci has served in many US Administrations. He is highly respected in the field and is head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases which is within the National Institutes of Health. The NIH is the central medical grant endowing body of the US government.

Dr. Fauci’s background is immunology and specifically infectious diseases. This makes it impossible for Fauci to deny knowledge around the gain of function research that will be the article’s topic.

Dr. Fauci and the Truth

The media and the public often refer to Dr. Fauci as a scientist. That is true, but one does not survive through the number of administrations that Dr. Fauci has and led the NIH without being a politician. And being political and politically motivated contradicts following a scientific approach. Being political means achieving an objective, and those objectives usually contradict scientific truth.

Repeated interviews and testimony from Dr. Fauci have revealed a willingness to bend the truth to meet political objectives. One of the first political analysts to pick up on this was Jimmy Dore. Dore critiqued Dr. Fauchi back in 2020 for providing contradictory information about wearing masks. It is important to note that back in mid-2020, no one in mainstream media was questioning Dr. Fauchi.

However, within the establishment media in the US, Dr. Fauci has been untouchable. Depending upon the group one is speaking with, it can get you branded as “anti-science.”

The Rand Paul, Dr. Fauchi Interaction

If you have read the article How the US, China, and the NIH and Dr. Fauci Promulgated the Coronavirus., these same videos are embedded in that article to skip them.

Observe the analysis of Dr. Fauchi’s interaction with Rand Paul.

Note that YouTube is at a degree of censorship that Jimmy Dore stated he could not cover the story unless it had first been covered elsewhere. YouTube has been suppressing Jimmy Dore’s channel because YouTube is financially and politically connected to the Democratic Party in the US, and Jimmy Dore critiques the Democratic Party.

Therefore, they retaliate by restricting the growth of subscribers to his channel. This is not hypothetical or an evidence-free claim. I have noticed that Jimmy Dore’s subscriber numbers never increase, but his views are still high.

Second Coverage

This issue was also covered by the following video produced by The Hill.

It is of note that neither of these is establishment media outlets. The establishment media, except for the few that are captured by Republicans like Fox News and Breitbart, are captured by the Democratic party. Fauci’s lies cannot be found on these outlets. 

This illustrates a highly doctrinal media system, with journalists presenting themselves as the standard-bearers of what is true when they repeat biased claims by powerful entities. This shows the media as the victim of a massive Dunning Kreuger Effect. As soon as the establishment hypothesis is created, media entities do the work of discrediting any competing hypothesis. A competing hypothesis is then called a “conspiracy theory.” Taibbi explains that in his experience, anyone who would naturally question the establishment’s explanations is run out of establishment media. This leaves a mass of conformist journalists who the establishment easily manipulates. 

An area where Fauci has been caught repeatedly lying and flip-flopping has been on the topic of the effectiveness of masks, which I cover in the following article.

This video shows that Fauci knew that it was most likely that the virus was made in a lab, and hid this information from the public and continues to lie about the topic. 

Fauci Providing False Information on AIDS in the 1980s

This video does a great job explaining how Fauci mismanaged the AIDS response from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases in the 1980s.

Fauci is speaking unscientifically right in this interview!

Both communication of what is a hypothesis and then concentrating on just AZT to the exclusion of everything else.

Secondly, if the incidence is very low (such as in the case of babies — where Fauci developed his hypothesis), this means it has to be taken into account. Furthermore, if a baby is born to a mother with AIDS, they have the same blood supply, so how hard is it to figure out it came from the mother? One article that did an excellent job showing the pattern of Fauci’s lies is AIER’s Fauci Was Duplicitous During the AIDS Crisis. The following quotes are from this article.

The article took an increasingly speculative turn in promoting this new theory. “If indeed the latter is true, then AIDS takes on an entirely new dimension,” it continued. “If we add to this possibility that nonsexual, non-blood-borne transmission is possible, the scope of the syndrome may be enormous.” The damage was already done though, as the media went to work stoking alarm about AIDS transmission through simple routine contacts. Hundreds of newspapers disseminated the distressing theory from Fauci’s article. Journalist Randy Shilts documented the incident in his classic early history of the AIDS crisis, And the Band Played On. Immunologist Arye Rubinstein had already offered a more plausible explanation for the infant case, which even cursory examination would verify: the disease transmitted from the mother to the baby during pregnancy. As Shilts explains, “Upon investigation, Rubinstein learned that Anthony Fauci had not bothered to read his paper.” The NIH scientist instead relied on second-hand information from another researcher to indulge in open-ended speculation (for a longer excerpt of Shilts, see David Henderson’s post on Fauci’s early career). On June 26, less than two months after his JAMA article appeared, Fauci publicly contradicted its most irresponsible claim – albeit without ever acknowledging his own central role in promoting that claim to begin with. As he told the Baltimore Sun, “It is absolutely preposterous to suggest that AIDS can be contracted through normal social contact like being in the same room with someone or sitting on a bus with them. The poor gays have received a very raw deal on this.” In short, Fauci flip-flopped with the political winds and the press barely even noticed. It’s a familiar pattern to anyone who has closely followed the infectious disease bureaucrat’s public commentary since Covid-19 burst into the national news cycle last January. – AEIR

How did Fauci not get called out for this? How did Fauci not get exposed earlier? Why was there no investigation of Fauci’s history before him being accepted as an expert?

In this video, Dr. Robert Malone explains the high cost and inefficient US response to corona, and the problematic centralized role of Dr Fauci and the pharmaceutical industry in setting public health policy.