How Bill Gates Funded Science Fraud in the PCR Test Development
Last Updated on November 13, 2021 by Shaun Snapp
Executive Summary
- The PCR test used to estimate covid cases has been exposed as science fraud.
- This model was funded by Bill Gates to be deliberately exaggerated.
Introduction
Bill Gates-funded research that was designed to be wrong but fit with the objectives of Bill Gates to exaggerate a pandemic. This is faux research to develop a PCR test for covid was always designed to overstate the number of people with covid. We will cover in this article another way Bill Gates manipulated the pandemic.
Our References for This Article
If you want to see our references for this article and related Brightwork articles, visit this link.
Gates Foundation Funds the Faulty PCR Test
As I have established already, anything funded by the Gates Foundation is going to be scientific fraud. Bill Gates funds things that allow him to profit maximize his investment portfolio. And it turns out the PCR test for covid, without which there would have also been no pandemic as of January 2021, was disavowed by the WHO as a legitimate teat for covid. This is only after a year of being used to drive the pandemic numbers to dizzying heights.
This is explained in the following quotation.
The Real Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) test was adopted by the WHO on January 23, 2020 as a means to detecting the SARS-COV-2 virus, following the recommendations of a Virology research group (based at Charité University Hospital, Berlin), supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (For Further details see the Drosten Study)
How the Gates PCR Test Was Eventually Discredited and Disavowed by the WHO
Exactly one year later on January 20th, 2021, the WHO retracts. They don’t say “We Made a Mistake”. The retraction is carefully formulated. (See original WHO document here as well as in Annex)
The World Health Organization (WHO) tacitly admits one year later that ALL PCR tests conducted at a 35 cycle amplification threshold (Ct) or higher are INVALID. But that is what they recommended in January 2020, in consultation with the virology team at Charité Hospital in Berlin.
If the test is conducted at a 35 Ct threshold or above (which was recommended by the WHO), genetic segments of the SARS-CoV-2 virus cannot be detected, which means that ALL the so-called confirmed “positive cases” tabulated in the course of the last 18 months are invalid.
From the outset, the PCR test has routinely been applied at a Ct amplification threshold of 35 or higher, following the January 2020 recommendations of the WHO. What this means is that the PCR methodology as applied Worldwide has in the course of the last 12-14 months led to the compilation of faulty and misleading Covid statistics.
At the time of writing (mid-March 2021), despite the WHO retraction, the PCT test is being used extensively to hike up the numbers with a view to sustaining the fear campaign, justifying the ongoing lockdown policies as well as the implementation of the Covid vaccine.
The WHO confirms that the Covid PCR test procedure as applied is invalid. There is absolutely no scientific basis for implementing the Covid Vaccine. – Global Research
Therefore, one can take the same test but change the number of amplification cycles it uses and generate false positives.
Where is the Media Coverage on the WHO Disavowing the PCR Tests?
The establishment media does not cover the disavowing of the PCR test by the CDC, nor does it expose that Bill Gates-funded and pushed the use of this test. This occurred in Jan of 2021, and I did not even find out about it until November of 2021, and only because I was specifically researching the topic. The fact that the PCR test was never accurate now calls into question the entire pandemic and the lockdowns and the studies into the effectiveness of the vaccines.
More on the Funding of the PCR Test
On January 23’rd 2020, the first diagnostic test to ‘test’ for the novel coronavirus had been created; a PCR test protocol published in Euroserveillance, by a team of scientists in Germany led by lead author’s Christian Drosten, Victor Corman, and Olfert Landt. In a 2014 interview with WirtsChafts, while developing the MERS PCR test, Drosten himself said of the PCR protocol:
“The method is so sensitive that it can detect a single hereditary molecule of this virus. If such a pathogen, for example, flits across a nurse’s nasal mucosa for a day without her getting sick or noticing anything else, she is suddenly a MERS case. Where previously, people at death’s door were reported, now mild cases and even people without symptoms are suddenly included in the reporting statistics.” – The Alternative Column
This brings up a question — is this test designed to find any molecule or to determine if a person has the virus or is sick from the virus? Because the test that is required determines the former, not the latter. Drosten brags about the sensitivity of the test. However, that is not the objective of designing a diagnostic test. One can make the argument of the test being impressive because it is susceptible. However, the sensitivity on a test can be set so high that it catches inactive viruses.
Switching the Sensitivity of the Test
The second enormous problem is that the sensitivity of the PCR test was changed depending upon the desired test result. This is explained in the following quotation.
How do we know the use of PCR testing at 35-45 cycles was known by authorities to be fraudulent? Because now that the vaccine program has been rolled out the vaccinated are only given PCR tests at a reasonable 28 cycles, while the unvaccinated continue to be subjected to the fraudulent 35-45 cycle PCR testing. (18). This of course deceptively insures that the unvaccinated continue to generate completely asymptomatic false positives, and can then be made to appear to be driving the spread of the illness. – Global Research
So when the desire is to find covid, the PCR test is run at 35 to 45 cycles. However, to protect the idea that the vaccines work, the vaccinated are given a test with 28 cycles. Now the question is, how widespread is this practice? This would mean there are different PCR test kits; one marked “for vaccinated” and a second for “unvaccinated.” Why is this necessary — because the vaccines do not work?
Why the Tests Founders Wanted an Overly Sensitive Test
I imagine the efficacy of the test at question hardly posed a threat to the paper’s founders, particularly co-author Olfert Landt, who also owns the PCR Test company TIB MOBIOL, which was producing PCR kits from February. According to Landt, the tests were produced without even having the ‘virus’, Landt said this of the PCR: “The test, the design, the development, came from the Charité [Institute]. We just immediately converted that into a kit format. When you don’t have the virus, which was initially only available in Wuhan, we can make a synthetic gene [i.e. using computer modelling] to simulate the virus genome. We did that very quickly.”
During this time, March 2020, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation committed $249,550 towards Drosten’s Charité institute to ‘develop tools to enable a rapid response to the novel 2019 coronavirus’. Soon after the funding and production of the test, the World Health Organisation, which has been funded to the tune of $5 billion from the Gates Foundation, accepted the ‘Corman-Drosten’ PCR kit as the first reliable test for Covid-19 and sent it around the globe. – The Alternative Column
Why Did The WHO Ever Approve of the Gates Funded PCR Test?
Why did the WHO accept the test as appropriate for covid if its sensitivity is set so high that it will result in more false positives than accurate positives? The WHO has the testing specialists to be able to evaluate such a test independently.
All of this brings up questions as to the WHO’s independence from Bill Gates.
The quote continues.
Christian Drosten would later be added to Germany’s International Advisory Board on Global Health, with Jeremy Farrar; director of the Wellcome Trust, and Dr. Christopher Elias, an attendee at Event 201 and president of the Global Development Program at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Drosten is also a member of CEPI, the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations, co-founded by Bill Gates, the World Economic Forum, and the Wellcome Trust. – The Alternative Column
Knowing Bill Gates, he pushed for the test to be deliberately designed to be far too sensitive and give false positives.
A Test for Covid Never Designed to be Used For Diagnosis?
It is explained in the following quotation that the Bill Gates-funded PCR test should have never been used as a diagnostic tool.
The fact is, the PCR test is not designed to be used as a diagnostic tool as it cannot distinguish between inactive viruses and “live” or reproductive ones. This is a crucial point, since inactive and reproductive viruses are not interchangeable in terms of infectivity. If you have a nonreproductive virus in your body, you will not get sick and you cannot spread it to others.
Secondly, many if not most laboratories amplify the RNA collected far too many times, which results in healthy people testing “positive.” Many scientists have noted that anything over 35 cycles is scientifically indefensible. A September 28, 2020, study in Clinical Infectious Diseases revealed that when you run a PCR test at a CT of 35 or higher, the accuracy drops to 3%, resulting in a 97% false positive rate. June 30, 2020, the CDC admitted that prior exposure to coronaviruses responsible for the common cold can result in a positive COVID-19 antibody test, even if you’ve never been exposed to SARS-CoV-2 specifically. If the vast majority of people who test positive for COVID-19 infection have no symptoms, don’t feel sick and don’t look sick, is COVID-19 really a “deadly” disease? Or, is it more like HPV — a viral infection that most people have without knowing it, and which 90% are able to eliminate without treatment? – Green Med Info
How do you create a fake pandemic? Well, you have a test that massively overestimates the number of people with the virus.
The WHO Recommends Everyone Get Retested…As Previous Tests Were Useless?
This is not an issue of “Weak Positives” and “Risk of False Positive Increases”. What is at stake is a “Flawed Methodology” which leads to invalid estimates.
What this admission of the WHO confirms is that the estimate of covid positive from a PCR test (with an amplification threshold of 35 cycles or higher) is invalid. In which case, the WHO recommends retesting: “a new specimen should be taken and retested…”.
The WHO calls for “Retesting”, which is tantamount to “We Screwed Up”.
And these are the statistics which are used to measure the progression of the so-called “pandemic”. Above an amplification cycle of 35 or higher, the test will not detect fragments of the virus. Therefore, the official “covid numbers” are meaningless.
It follows that there is no scientific basis for confirming the existence of a pandemic. – Global Research
A WHO Controlled by Bill Gates
Unless the WHO has given up their independence to align with Bill Gates, there is no justification for why the WHO endorsed this test. However, while there was no technical reason to endorse the test, there could have been a monetary reason, as the following quote illustrates.
Like most institutes that reflect the mainstream doctrine, the World Health Organisation has received masses of money from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Currently, the Foundation’s website lists 565 different grants donated to the World Health Organisation since their first partnership in 1998. To name a few grants listed,
in July 2008 the foundation donated $676m,
in July 2018 they donated $121m,
in September 2014 it donated $307m and the list goes on, totaling something around the $5bn mark. – The Alternative Column
Yes, giving five billion dollars will buy a lot of influence over the WHO.
So let us review the funding and approval of the PCR test.
- The research was in part funded by a grant from Bill Gates.
- The approving body of the PCR test, the WHO, has received billions of dollars from Bill Gates.
- The PCR test was set to such a sensitive level that it was finally disavowed by the WHO and considered unreliable — however, the PCR test continues to be used.
At the end of this video, this doctor describes the fact that the PCR test produces 95% false positives.
Conclusion
Bill Gates funded the defective PCR tests and the organization that approved the tests, the WHO. As the financial tendrils to each of the entities involved in the pandemic become more apparent, it becomes more difficult to assert that Bill Gates bought many of the items used to provide information on the covid pandemic and, in fact, exaggerate that pandemic. The reason is simple — Bill Gates’ investments into the treatment for the pandemic.
An Interesting Question
This question is brought up by Dr. Lidiya Angelova.
It is because from one side PCR test shows only part of the virus sequence so it isn’t evidence for an infection or even that there is a virus. From the other side the symptoms are same of multiple common diseases. There is no difference in lungs of people with positive PCR test and people who test negative.
I found a way to prove that the sequence SARS-CoV-2 causes COVID-19. I suggested it to World Health Organization back in may 2020 via an open brainstorming channel. It was read by someone from WHO, and dismissed.
