How Bill Gates Funded Science Fraud in the PCR Test Development

Executive Summary

• The PCR test used to estimate covid cases has been exposed as science fraud.
• Bill Gates funded this model to be deliberately exaggerated.

Introduction

Bill Gates funded research designed to be wrong but fit with the objectives of Bill Gates to exaggerate a pandemic. This is faux research to develop a PCR test for covid was always designed to overstate the number of people with covid. We will cover in this article another way Bill Gates manipulated the pandemic.

Our References for This Article

To see our references for this article and related Brightwork articles, visit this link.

Gates Foundation Funds the Faulty PCR Test

As I have established, anything the Gates Foundation funds will be scientific fraud. Bill Gates supports things that allow him to profit and maximize his investment portfolio. It turns out the PCR test for covid, without which there would have been no pandemic as of January 2021, was disavowed by the WHO as a legitimate test for covid. This is only after a year of being used to drive the pandemic numbers to dizzying heights.

This is explained in the following quotation.

The Real Time Reverse Transcription Polymerase Chain Reaction (rRT-PCR) test was adopted by the WHO on January 23, 2020 as a means to detecting the SARS-COV-2 virus, following the recommendations of a Virology research group (based at Charité University Hospital, Berlin), supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. (For Further details see the Drosten Study)

How the Gates PCR Test Was Eventually Discredited and Disavowed by the WHO

Exactly one year later on January 20th, 2021, the WHO retracts. They don’t say “We Made a Mistake”. The retraction is carefully formulated. (See original WHO document here as well as in Annex)

The World Health Organization (WHO) tacitly admits one year later that ALL PCR tests conducted at a 35 cycle amplification threshold (Ct) or higher are INVALID. But that is what they recommended in January 2020, in consultation with the virology team at Charité Hospital in Berlin.

If the test is conducted at a 35 Ct threshold or above (which was recommended by the WHO), genetic segments of the SARS-CoV-2 virus cannot be detected, which means that ALL the so-called confirmed “positive cases” tabulated in the course of the last 18 months are invalid.

From the outset, the PCR test has routinely been applied at a Ct amplification threshold of 35 or higher, following the January 2020 recommendations of the WHO. What this means is that the PCR methodology as applied Worldwide has in the course of the last 12-14 months led to the compilation of faulty and misleading Covid statistics.

At the time of writing (mid-March 2021), despite the WHO retraction, the PCT test is being used extensively to hike up the numbers with a view to sustaining the fear campaign, justifying the ongoing lockdown policies as well as the implementation of the Covid vaccine.

The WHO confirms that the Covid PCR test procedure as applied is invalid. There is absolutely no scientific basis for implementing the Covid Vaccine. – Global Research

Therefore, one can take the same test but change the number of amplification cycles it uses and generate false positives.

Where is the Media Coverage on the WHO Disavowing the PCR Tests?

The establishment media does not cover the CDC’s disavowing of the PCR test, nor does it expose that Bill Gates funded and pushed the use of this test. This occurred in January 2021, and I did not even find out about it until November 2021, only because I was explicitly researching the topic. The fact that the PCR test was never accurate now calls into question the entire pandemic, the lockdowns, and the studies into the effectiveness of the vaccines. 

More on the Funding of the PCR Test

On January 23’rd 2020, the first diagnostic test to ‘test’ for the novel coronavirus had been created; a PCR test protocol published in Euroserveillance, by a team of scientists in Germany led by lead author’s Christian Drosten, Victor Corman, and Olfert Landt. In a 2014 interview with WirtsChafts, while developing the MERS PCR test, Drosten himself said of the PCR protocol:

“The method is so sensitive that it can detect a single hereditary molecule of this virus. If such a pathogen, for example, flits across a nurse’s nasal mucosa for a day without her getting sick or noticing anything else, she is suddenly a MERS case. Where previously, people at death’s door were reported, now mild cases and even people without symptoms are suddenly included in the reporting statistics.” – The Alternative Column

This brings up a question — is this test designed to find any molecule or to determine if a person has the virus or is sick from the virus? Because the test that is required determines the former, not the latter. Drosten brags about the sensitivity of the test. However, that is not the objective of designing a diagnostic test. One can argue that the test is impressive because it is susceptible. However, the sensitivity on a test can be set so high that it catches inactive viruses.