How Google Facebook and Twitter Censored Accurate Information on Covid to Promote The Vaccines
Last Updated on January 5, 2023 by Shaun Snapp
Executive Summary
- As more information has come to light, the degree of censorship employed by Big Tech on covid is overwhelming.
Introduction
Many powerful entities, including medical authorities, pharmaceutical companies, media, and Big Tech, engaged in censorship to push people to become vaccinated without informed consent. This article describes how this was accomplished.
Our References for This Article
If you want to see our references for this article and related Brightwork articles, visit this link.
Google’s Censorship on the Topic of the Vaccines
As were performed research into covid, we found clear censorship on the part of Google on the topic of adverse reactions and deaths from the vaccine.
Observe what I typed in Google’s search box. “Gene-based vaccines killing people global research.”
Comparing Censoring Search Engines Like Google to Non-Censoring Search Engines Like Duck Duck Go
I also typed in the name of the website I wanted, Global Research. However, Google returned not that website article but instead “fact-checking” websites contradicting the article.
I checked DuckDuckGo, which is not known for censoring results. The results are not “fact-checking” (fact-checking has become a euphemism for establishing discrediting ideas and information that challenge the status quo and is usually more accurate than the information from establishment sources). However, still where is the Global Research article?
I found the article by going directly to the Global Research website and typing in the search there. Here is a screenshot of it.
This article, which two very popular search engines were not interested in me reading, said the following.
For example, in 1976, the U.S. government vaccinated 45 million people against pandemic swine flu. The entire program was canceled after reports of just 53 deaths, according to Fox News. Note: The number of deaths reported after the 1976 inoculation program varies from three to 53, depending on the source.5,6,7
Now, health authorities are shrugging off more than 3,800 deaths8 after COVID-19 vaccination as either coincidental or inconsequential. Think about that. Five months into the COVID-19 vaccination campaign, we’re looking at a death toll that is 7,000% greater than during the swine flu vaccination campaign, which was canceled after the vaccine was deemed too risky.
The COVID-19 “vaccine” is also on a level of magnitude more dangerous than the seasonal flu vaccine. As reported by McCullough, on average, there are 20 to 30 deaths reported
following the seasonal flu vaccine, which is given to about 195 million Americans each year.9 Compare that to these novel COVID-19 gene therapies. So far, an estimated 124 millionAmericans are fully vaccinated against COVID-19 and the death count is already at 3,837, as of April 30, 2021.10
A third comparison can be made against vaccines as a whole. As reported by Tucker Carlson, 15May 6, 2021, the COVID-19 shots have already resulted in more deaths than all available vaccines combined from mid-1997 until the end of 2013 — a period of 15.5 years.
In a recent report, the Israeli People Committee (IPC), a civilian body of health experts, similarly concluded that “there has never been a vaccine that has harmed as many people.” The Committee received 288 reports of death following COVID-19 vaccination, 90% of which occurred within 10 days. According to this report (translated from Hebrew):
February 19, 2021, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued a statement saying there were “no safety problems” with Pfizer’s and Moderna’s mRNA injections.17 Of the 113 deaths reported at that time, none was deemed to be related to the vaccines. Then, in May 2021, after reviewing 1,600 deaths reported to VAERS with an unnamed group of U.S. Food and Drug Administration doctors, the CDC declared that none of the deaths was related to the vaccine — this despite 24% of deaths have occurred within 48 hours of injection, and 16% within 24 hours. The problem is that it would take several months to investigate that many deaths, so the likelihood that this was a thorough investigation is slim to none.
The reason you’re not hearing any negative news about these “vaccines” is because major media networks and stakeholders in COVID-19 vaccines have formed a “trusted news credibility coalition” that seeks to prevent any negative information about COVID vaccines to get into the popular media “because they’re concerned about vaccine hesitancy,” McCullough says.
The system is clearly failing if every single report of serious injury or death, including all the ones occurring within hours and in people with no underlying health problems, are simply written off as coincidence. It’s simply not believable.
Of these, Pfizer’s mRNA injection accounted for the largest number of deaths at 4,293, followed by Moderna with 2,094 deaths, AstraZeneca with 1,360 deaths and Johnson & Johnson with 19 deaths. As noted by McCullough: – Global Research
Yes, this all seems like information the governments and the pharmaceutical industry would not want the public to know as it may increase “vaccine hesitancy.” This goes beyond pushing results down. Google has de-indexed the article.
Interested in More?
Would you like to get access to 100% independent medical information?
We Are Not The Only Ones Noticing the Search Engine Censorship
Interestingly this issue of censorship is addressed in an article by Global Research, from which I took the following quotation.
I have found that the suppression of any articles questioning the official narratives that isn’t presented as “fake news” is almost virtually complete in my own Google searches. This means one must know before one searches the actual name of the post you are looking for or of the name of an alternative independent media site like Global Research or OffGuardian, because it appears that Google will now routinely use its algorithms to do everything in its power to avoid taking you to anything but articles and sites supporting the official narratives.
We now live in a world in which MSM outlets across all platforms routinely refuse to publish general articles, opinion pieces, video interviews, or even reference peer reviewed scientific journal articles by world renowned scientists if that material diverges from the official CDC/WHO opinion and stated policy.One cannot help but note the rather seamless nature of this entire propaganda operation.It is indeed impressive from a prospective of totalitarian narrative control. – Gary Weglarz
The Pharmaceutical Company, Medical Establishment, Media and FDA’s Deceptive Emergency Use Authorization
The media continually stated that the vaccines had been “approved” when they had received only a EUA. In their announcement, the FDA made several false claims.
