How Muslims Seek to Eliminate Freedom of Speech in Europe But Only For Non-Muslims

Table of Contents: Select a Link to be Taken to That Section

Executive Summary

Muslims say they respect the law of the land where they live, but we will show Muslims demanding the reduction of freedom of speech in France and other countries.

Introduction

There is a myth that most Muslims are moderate, and there is only a small percentage of global Muslims who are extremists. In this article, we cover how the reactions of Muslims tell us very clearly how Muslims really feel about issues and how most Muslims fall into the category of extremism. We will discuss how Muslims are undermining freedom of speech in Europe.

See our references for this article and related articles at this link.

How Do Muslims React to A Teacher Being Beheaded for Showing Muhammed Cartoons

The majority of Muslims support people being beheaded for the mildest freedom of speech, such as showing cartoons critical of Mohammed.

A Chechen living in France, Abdoullakh Abouyedovich Anzorov, beheaded a French teacher who showed Mohammed’s cartoons to students. Anzorov was called the “Lion of Islam” and given a hero’s welcome to Chechnia for performing this act. As the video points out, parents and students and many social media posters promoted Anzorov to take revenge against this teacher. This is explained in the following quotation.

Ten people have been charged with assisting the killer, including an imam, a parent of a student, and two students at Paty’s school. – Wikipedia

Yet the coverage by Western establishment media is that the event was only due to a single Muslim extremist, leaving out the public outcry against the cartoons being shown, the information provided to the Muslim murderer by other Muslims, and the calls for revenge by both parents of the students and the larger Muslim community.

And this is not just everyday Muslims that supported the beheading. Several leaders from Islamic countries stated that Anzorov had been provoked Muslims. They state they oppose the beheadings, but they do not state that French citizens should have the right to show Islamic cartoons. It appears much more likely that they do not oppose the beheadings but only say they oppose it out of political correctness. This conclusion can be naturally arrived at by observing how they refuse to support the secular freedom of speech laws in France. And there are many countries such as Saudi Arabia and Iran where the penalty for apostasy is death.

And why is Macron being vilified in Muslim countries? Because he stated after the beheadings that Islam was in crisis. Macron demands the French freedom of speech laws be respected, and Muslims refuse to respect these laws. Apparently, Muslims who begged to be allowed into the country did not realize they would have to respect French laws and consider Islamic Law superior to French laws. Muslims disagree with the freedom of speech laws in every country to which they immigrate.

Notice that what angers Muslims is not the beheading, but the fact that Macron stated that he would protect secular freedom of speech. The only anger the Muslims seem to feel is concerning what Macron said about freedom of speech. In the video above, one of the Muslims, Sardar Masood Khan – President of Pakistan Administered Kashmir, states the following.

This type of denunciation is being not only in the Muslim countries but in non-Muslim countries, and the purpose is to convey a message to President Macron, but also to the Western leaders that this practice of Islamaphobia or incitement to hatred will not be acceptable to the Muslim world. This is against the United Nation’s Charter, international law, and many treaties and conventions that are there to protect the rights of followers of all faiths including Islam, and therefore this systematic practice cannot be allowed. This is a clear message coming from the Muslim world. Let me also tell you that in France and in many Western countries there are laws against denying Holocaust or making statements in regards to anti-semitism and so on, and you can’t propagate Naziism or Facism. So similarly, in the same vein, you cannot insult The Prophet of Islam. You can’t insult the most precious and the most revered icon in the Muslim world.

This is a direct contradiction of freedom of speech. Therefore, on wonders, what does Khan believe is an appropriate punishment for insulting The Prophet? And Khan is correct that several countries have made it illegal to say certain negative things about Islam or Mohammed. One example is Austria, where it is illegal to call Mohammed a pedophile (which he was). Something else that Khan does not appear to realize is that France is not a Muslim country. Therefore he appears to want Islamic Law applied to France.

As for Khan’s comment on the UN Charter, here is what I was able to find regarding religion.

To achieve international co-operation in solving international problems of an economic, social, cultural, or humanitarian character, and in promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language, or religion;

Does that sound like a restriction on freedom of speech versus religion? No, it does not. Furthermore, all Muslim countries restrict the rights of non-Muslims. Therefore, it is challenging for Muslims to about some type of universal deference that all countries must show religion.

Muslims will not tolerate any coverage of Islam or Muslims that is not flattering and will begin a campaign of outrage using faux arguments about being singled out. What they are really doing is covering up for the abuses in the Islamic community.

In this video, David Wood explains how Muslims pressure media outlets to not describe the fact that terrorist attacks are by Muslims. Any person or media outlet that does not agree to censor itself will be called “Islamophobic.”

In this video, the Apostate Prophet explains how blasphemy laws are being enforced almost exclusively in favor of Islam. This is because Christians do not try to get archaic blasphemy laws enforced. However, Muslims to try to get these laws enforced, and to have new laws passed in Europe that only protect Islam.

Apostasy and Blasphemy Laws by Country

Source Data: Pew Research
This chart is interactive. Just hover over the country to see the name of the country displayed

In this sheet, the countries coded in red have both apostasy and blasphemy laws. The countries in orange, have only apostasy laws. What becomes apparent, is that only Muslim countries have apostasy laws. And while blasphemy laws exist outside of Muslim countries, it is very rare to unheard of to hear of people actually prosecuted under any blasphemy law outside of a Muslim dominated country.

Muslims that immigrate to non-Muslim countries want to bring their apostasy and blasphemy laws with them, but only in one direction. That is they only want Islam protected, and for Muslims to be able to insult anyone else’s religion.

British Legal System Aligns Itself with Muslims Pedophiles Over Domestic UK Citizens

This is what Islam is doing to the freedom of speech protection for UK citizens. Freedom of speech is on the decline all through Europe.

Go to top

Conclusion

Muslims oppose freedom of speech both in Muslim countries and find non-Muslim countries. There is no Muslim country that has freedom of speech, and the more Muslims live in a country the more the rest of the population loses their freedom of speech.