How The NIH And Hospitals Used Remdesivir To Quickly Kill Covid Patients

Last Updated on June 5, 2022 by Shaun Snapp

Executive Summary

  • Remdesivir was critical in increasing the US covid mortality rate.
  • See how the drug known as Dr. Fauci’s Death Tonic was used.

Introduction

Remdesivir is a deadly drug that was given Emergency Use Authorization while having its deadly adverse events hidden by ending the study early and through fraud. See how this drug helped medical authorities increase covid deaths.

Our References for This Article

If you want to see our references for this article and related Brightwork articles, visit this link.

Remdesivir Is An Ineffective Drug?

Remedsivir is the primary drug treatment for covid in the US.

The following slides are from Whose Interests do Public Health Officials Represent by Brad Geyer. At this link, Brad evaluates several Remdesvir studies.

The following slide shows the conflicts of interest in a study paid for by Gilead Sciences.

The following slide shows that Gilead Sciences probably wrote this study published in the New England Journal of Medicine. That means the study was most likely written by Gilead Sciences, which amounts to the marketing department at Gilead hiring a “medical education” company to rig the study. 

How can studies in which Gilead ghostwrites that the New England Journal of Medicine or NEJM was never present or involved in any of the studies be considered reliable?

The answer is that the NEJM does not seem to care who wrote the study and that NEJM is not performing its quality checking function.

The Ridiculous Model of the Prestigious Medical Journals

I have software vendors that seek to submit articles to Brightwork Research & Analysis for publication. All of the information they provide is rigged and written by the marketing department, and they have offered to pay us to publish it.

However, we would never republish any of the information provided by software vendors. One might say that it is “different” because the pharmaceutical companies perform studies. However, if we allow a software vendor to run a study, we know the result. Why would a pharmaceutical company present an honest study when there is so much money on the line for them for the study to be positive. We conduct research. Why would we want a software vendor to pay for research to be done, which we do not participate in and cannot see what is withheld, and then put our imprimatur of credibility on that rigged study? It does not make sense to publish research that we cannot verify and that we have nothing to do with.

It seems that the New England Journal of Medicine and other medical journals are simply doing exactly what I just outlined but for drug companies instead of software vendors.

I cover the problem with peer-reviewed journals in The Often Hidden Problems With Peer Review Research article.

The WHO Study Contradicts the Fake Study by Gilead Sciences

The World Health Organization is corrupt. However, they are far less corrupt than the NIH, CDC, or FDA. The WHO has repeatedly contradicted US health authorities, but this was never reported in the establishment media. You can read how the WHO declared the PCR tests invalid back in January of 2021 in the article Understanding the PCR Test and How There Was Never a Reliable Test for Covid. This means that the continually published covid cases were mainly false positives. However, the WHO conclusion was not communicated to the public because it did not fit the needs of the establishment.

Getting back to the WHO’s view on Remdesivir, the following slide explains what the WHO thought of Remdesivir.

Along with these terrible side effects, the WHO states that Remdesivir had no beneficial effect. However, as the note points out, HCQ was tested without zinc, and HCQ requires zinc to work, and one would run an HCQ study without its cofactor zinc to make it look like HCQ does not work. 

The WHO also states that HCQ has no beneficial effect, which is strange as many studies show the benefit of HCQ, which you can see in the following screenshot from C19Early, a site that tracks studies on covid treatments.

HCQ is shown here as more effective than Remdesivir in this comparison, but many of these Remdesivir studies were faked, and Remdesivir has horrendous drugs.

Secondly, as I pointed out with the way the WHO ran the HCQ study, several studies were funded by pharmaceutical-aligned entities to discredit HCQ by removing zinc from the study. This was done because HCQ is off-patent.

Helping to Promote the Pandemic by Boosting “Covid” Mortality

Looking at a number of the Remdesivir studies and its history going back to when it was a failed drug for Ebola, Remdesivir clearly has a highly negative impact on health and kills a high percentage of the people who take it. This fact implicates Dr. Fauci and the NIH apparatus because they know that this drug is deadly and ultimately ineffective, but they do not seem to care due to financial conflicts. Remdesivir has been important in helping to increase the mortality rate, which is attributed to covid, which helps meet the objectives of the NIH and CDC to have a pandemic.

How Remdesivir Must Have Killed People Who Never Had Covid

Due to the fact that most PCR tests are false positives as the test is unreliable, this also means that patients have been killed by Remdesivir that never had covid. However, because covid is placed on the death certificate, these deaths will not be recorded as adverse drug reactions or medical malpractice. Either way, the hospital got paid.

The following slide shows the shock and surprise of those scientists familiar with Remdesivir that the FDA approved a highly deadly drug.

Anyone who reads the studies concludes that the general public cannot use Remdesivir. But then it gets approved for Emergency Use Authorization.

Patients Have Begun To Figure This Out

The following quotes were taken from an article in Mother Jones that decried how patients were “fighting” their treatments.

Earlier this month, Leavitt claimed on Facebook that the IHC hospital in St. George had killed her parents, who died within minutes of each other in late September. She wrote that when her mother entered the hospital, the doctor planned to put her on a ventilator and administer Remdesivir. “I gave him a Big Hell NO,” Leavitt wrote. In response, she wrote, the doctor told her that he was going to write “Do not resuscitate” in her mother’s chart, asking, “Is that what you want?” She says the doctor then informed her that if she didn’t want to follow the protocol, her mother didn’t qualify for ICU care, and he moved her to another floor of the hospital to die without receiving Leavitt’s treatments of choice, such as IV vitamins and the deworming drug Ivermectin. – Mother Jones

Isn’t that nice? If patients don’t follow the deadly treatment protocol, the MDs will change the resuscitation instructions.

In September, the medical director of Park City Hospital in Summit County, which has the highest vaccination rate in the entire state, told the county health board that patients coming into the hospital with COVID were behaving very differently than they had in the past. “We’re seeing hate in their eyes,” Dr. Wing Province told the board, according to the Park Record. Nurses and doctors working in the overburdened ICU were dealing with hostile patients who often didn’t believe they were infected or demanded unproven treatments. Some had even become violent because they believed, as the protesters do, that the hospital was trying to kill them.

“We had a gal who came in whose oxygen levels were critically low, to the point where she could nearly die if we didn’t give her oxygen,” Province said. “And as our nurses went to her aid to put on oxygen, to put in an IV, and try to stabilize her, she being COVID-positive, spit in our nurse’s face, kicked our nurse in the chest with her foot, and scratched all the technicians and everyone else that were coming in to try to put in an IV.” He described a patient who left the hospital early against medical advice whose family is now suing IHC because doctors refused to give the patient Ivermectin. – Mother Jones

We ask because it does not appear that Mother Jones is known if this treatment protocol is effective or not effective. The kill rate for Remdesivir is roughly similar to if the MD brought out a revolver and put three bullets in it, then spun the cylinder and then pointed at your relative. Under that mathematical likelihood, would you not be justified in tackling the MD?

Hospitals Are Specifically Designed To Rip Off Patients

It should not be surprising that hospitals kill patients. Hospitals are major places where patients are ripped off.

This video shows how hospitals function. 

The hospitals in the US were approached by consulting firms that helped profit maximize profits, which meant charging the absolute most. Now hedge funds have taken an interest in hospitals to further maximize revenues and profits, which means that prices will go up again in the future.

This system is not critiqued…for some bizarre reason. As Elizabeth Rosenthal points out in the video, this is not normal in other countries. This is why it increasingly makes sense to leave the US whenever you can to obtain medical treatment. First, the costs go down enormously, and secondly, you have more control over your treatment.

What The Current Hospital and Medical System Does To the Value of Health Insurance

Another thing this does is reduce the value of US health insurance. This is because you can’t apply US health insurance to other countries. This places the US hospital and overall health system in the position of “emergency use.” However, when surgery is necessary, health procedures say that can be foreseen, that procedure can be planned by comparing options outside the US.

However, many people are not aware of medical tourism and are therefore stuck with only the US system as an option.

Hospitals want exorbitant amounts of money for applying a treatment protocol that kills a high percentage of those that undergo this treatment protocol. This man was put into a coma and ventilated. He will never be the same again and received a bill of $1 million. That is roughly $16,000 per day. 

Conclusion

Remdesivir allowed the medical establishment (and other interested parties) to exaggerate the number of deaths from covid, which as is covered in the article How the Deaths from Covid 19 Was Irresponsibly Exaggerated, was a major objective throughout the pandemic.

However, this was just one of the steps taken. To see how steps were instituted to create the covid pandemic see the article Pandemic In A Box: The Specific Steps Used to Create the Covid Pandemic.

Be Notified When Our Upcoming Subscription Website on Ivermectin and Other Medical Treatments is Ready

Ivermectin has many treatment applications outside of its approved use (as an antiparasitical. These treatments include cancer, covid, immunity, and more. And due to perverse financial incentives, many of these applications are hidden from the public.

Due to the many questions we receive on Ivermectin, we are now working on a subscription website that covers everything related to Ivermectin ranging from its many health improvement applications to dosages, and contrasting this with the false information presented on Ivermectin by medical authorities. The site will be ready soon as we are making good progress. We will also be adding questions from subscribers answered as customized articles. 

If you are potentially interested in subscribing, contact us using the text chat widget in the lower right-hand corner of this page and just tell us you are interested in being informed when the website is live.