- This is the Brightwork Research & Analysis software rating series.
- We rate both the software and estimate the risk of implementing each application.
MUFI Rating & Risk for Microsoft Dynamics AX
MUFI: Maintainability, Usability, Functionality, Implement ability
Vendor: Microsoft (Select For Vendor Profile)
Microsoft has several ERP systems Microsoft Dynamics SL, Microsoft Dynamics NAV, Microsoft Dynamics GP with Microsoft Dynamics AX being the largest. Microsoft Dynamics AX is the premium version of Microsoft’s ERP suite.
Microsoft Dynamics AX is a composite of some acquisitions – including most prominently Great Plains Software. Microsoft has been one of the fastest growing ERP systems in the past few years. A major boost to Microsoft has been its strategy of allowing customers just to buy and pay for components. This is the opposite strategy followed by tier 1 ERP vendors that require the purchase of the entire suite. In fact, this is also quite beneficial for customers as contrary to popular belief; not all companies have implemented ERP. Many ERP proponents have proposed that any company that has not implemented ERP systems needs to – however, we believe that to be untrue. Furthermore, many companies that have ERP systems have implemented only certain modules, and within these modules only certain functionality. Microsoft Dynamics AX has an abysmal user satisfaction level.
Like NetSuite, Microsoft Dynamics AX is a faux ERP system. However, unlike NetSuite, its strength is not its financial system. All ERP systems have their strengths and weaknesses, but Microsoft Dynamics AX has been stitched together from whatever applications Microsoft was able to acquire. Because of this, it is the most uneven application we have ever tested. For instance, Microsoft Dynamics is weak in many supply chain functions even though it is not a “finance heavy” ERP system. On the other hand is curiously strong in service parts management. This is simply a consequence of whom Microsoft acquired. Microsoft Dynamics AX is marketed as an ERP system, but it has very weak supply chain functionality.
This is not as negative as it might appear, as in our view it is better not to have the functionality – if it is merely mediocre because then one can purchase a best of breed application and connect it to the “ERP,” system. However, the problem is that many companies that purchase Microsoft Dynamics AX think that this functionality is at least somewhat capable. In our view, it makes much more sense to buy a stand-alone financial system, and then connect best of breed applications to it, rather than to buy an ERP system which is missing so many components of what makes up and ERP.
Something, which should be a concern to anyone thinking of the application, is that Microsoft has not done very much with Dynamics AX aside from cobbling together its acquisitions. This brings up the question of whether they will add very much to the application in the future. We think its unlikely that they will.
Our overall observation is that it is difficult to see how Microsoft Dynamics AX would be anywhere near as popular as it is if it was not associated with Microsoft. Microsoft Dynamics AX has lived off of its integration with other Microsoft products and the fact its account managers can pitch the product to most Microsoft accounts. However, as usual, Microsoft has a lagging product. Microsoft Dynamics AX is also because of its unevenness a confusing product. If your company works in service parts, AX may be a desirable purchased because this functionality is strong. However it is unlikely improvements in AX will come from internal development, but rather from future software acquisitions. However, it’s not clear to us that an ERP system that makes sense can be composed of software acquisitions.
Of course, purchasing Microsoft Dynamics AX also means dealing with the Microsoft “monster” (even though their Microsoft Dynamics website looks so soft and fuzzy) while accessing an application with limited upside.
Microsoft’s Dynamics website was so soft and filled with such soft figures, we – for a moment forgot how Microsoft frequently employs brass knuckle tactics with its customers and competitors.
AX has positive buzz because it has been growing well – however, this growth in sales does not appear to be driven by the quality of the product, but instead is due to a change in marketing and sales strategy where Microsoft sales reps are empowered to sell the usage of just portions of the software.
As AX is not a complete ERP solution or offers uneven coverage, it is likely that many of AX’s sales are destined to be at clients that intend to bring up just a small portion of the functionality. We would recommend against the purchase of Microsoft Dynamics AX. It is the weakest of the “new” ERP systems, its user and buyer satisfaction is as bad as it gets, and the fact it is produced by Microsoft does not even provide the illusion of integration that comes when products are purchased from a major vendor.
Microsoft Dynamics AX is one of the few ERP applications that provide a trial.
All scores out of a possible 10.
- Ma. = Maintainability
- Us. = Usability
- Fu. = Functionality
- Im. = Implementability
|Average Score for Big ERP||5.1||4.8||5.2||5.4||Big ERP|
|Average Score for CRM||6.2||6.2||5.1||5.9||CRM|
|Average Score for Small and Medium ERP||8.3||8||6.7||8.5||Small and Medium ERP|
|Average Score for Finance||8.8||8.8||8||8.8||Finance|
|Average Score for Demand Planning||7.6||7.2||7||7.1||Demand Planning|
|Average Score for Supply Planning||6.7||6.9||7||6.8||Supply Planning|
|Average Score for Production Planning||6.8||6.9||7||6.9||Production Planning|
|Average Score for BI Heavy||5.5||5.3||6.9||5.3||BI Heavy|
|Average Score for PLM||7||7.2||6.8||7.3||PLM|
|Average Score for BI Light||7.7||8.7||9||8.3||BI Light|
|Arena Solutions Arena PLM||10||10||10||10||PLM|
|AspenTech AspenOne||4||8||10||7||Production Planning|
|ERPNext||10||10||7.5||10||Small and Medium ERP|
|Delfoi Planner||8||6||6.5||7||Production Planning|
|Demand Works Smoothie SP||9||10||7||10||Supply Planning|
|Hamilton Grant RM||10||9||8.5||9||PLM|
|IBM Cognos||2.7||3||1.5||3||BI Heavy|
|Infor Lawson||8||7||6||7||Big ERP|
|Intuit QuickBooks Enterprise Solutions||9||9||5||9||Finance|
|JDA DM||9||7.5||8||8||Demand Planning|
|Microsoft Dynamics CRM||2||3||2||2||CRM|
|Netsuite OneWorld||7||7||8||8||Big ERP|
|Oracle BI||4||4||3||6||BI Heavy|
|Oracle CRM On Demand||4||5||3||5||CRM|
|Oracle Demantra||5||3||3.5||4.5||Demand Planning|
|Oracle JD Edwards World||4||1||3||6||Big ERP|
|PlanetTogether Galaxy APS||10||10||10||10||Production Planning|
|QlikTech QlikView||9||9||10||9||BI Light|
|Rootstock||9||8||9||9||Small and Medium ERP|
|Sage X3||8||8||7||8||Big ERP|
|SAP APO DP||3||4||3||2||Demand Planning|
|SAP APO PP/DS||2||2||4||3||Production Planning|
|SAP APO SNP||3||4||8||4||Supply Planning|
|SAP BI/BW||1.5||2||4||2||BI Heavy|
|SAP Business Objects||3||2.5||7||3||BI Heavy|
|SAP ECC||3||3||6.5||3||Big ERP|
|SAP SmartOps||4||4||7||5.5||Supply Planning|
|SAS BI||6.5||7||9||6||BI Heavy|
|SAS Demand Driven Forecasting||7||8||9||7||Demand Planning|
|Tableau (BI)||9||10||10||10||BI Light|
|Tableau (Forecasting)||10||8||5||9||Demand Planning|
|ToolsGroup SO99 (Forecasting)||7||8||9||7||Demand Planning|
|ToolsGroup SO99 (Supply)||5||6||10||7||Supply Planning|
Vendor and Application Risk
Microsoft Dynamics AX is one of the simpler ERP implementations. Microsoft has created straightforward configuration screens, a reasonably good user interface and its shortage of functionality means there are far fewer options and alternatives to present to a client than with many other ERP applications.
Likelihood of Implementation Success
This accounts for both the application and vendor-specific risk. In our formula, the total implementation risk is application + vendor + buyer risk. The buyer specific risk could increase or decrease this overall likelihood and adjust the values that you see below.
Likelihood of Application Implementation Success and Failure
Search for the application in this table using the search bar in the upper right of the table.
|Application||Prob of Implementation Success||Prob of Implementation Failure|
|SAP Crystal Reports||0.46||0.54|
|Microsoft Dynamics CRM||0.26||0.74|
|Oracle RightNow CRM||0.41||0.59|
|Oracle CRM On Demand||0.36||0.64|
|SAP Business Objects||0.32||0.68|
|Hamilton Grant RM||0.89||0.11|
|PlanetTogether Galaxy APS||0.96||0.04|
|SAP APO PP/DS||0.27||0.73|
|Demand Works Smoothie SP||0.93||0.07|
|ToolsGroup SO99 (Supply)||0.82||0.18|
|Demand Works Smoothie||0.96||0.04|
|SAS Demand Driven Forecasting||0.82||0.18|
|ToolsGroup SO99 (Forecasting)||0.86||0.14|
|SAP APO DP||0.28||0.72|
|Intuit QB Enterprise||0.8||0.2|
|Microsoft Dynamics AX||0.4||0.6|
|SAP Business One||0.49||0.51|
|Oracle JD Edwards World||0.31||0.69|
|Oracle JD Edwards EnterpriseOne||0.36||0.64|
|SAP ERP ECC/R/3||0.32||0.68|
Risk Management Approach
Two significant issues stick out concerning Microsoft Dynamics AX implementations – one is the limited functionality that Microsoft Dynamics AX has to offer, along with the low quality of information provided by Microsoft regarding their applications. This can put the implementation on the high-risk pathway if expectations are not brought down to what Microsoft Dynamics AX is capable of on an implementation after the sales process is complete.