How Useful is SAP API Management?

Executive Summary

  • SAP API Management is resold Apigee and is promoted to improve integration.
  • How valid are SAP’s claims around SAP API Management?


SAP offers the following video on the SAP API Management product. We have placed our observations about this video below the video.

SAP API Management as Part of SAP Cloud?

We have already written about how SAP Cloud is primarily a mechanism for upcharging other cloud providers in the article How to Understand SAP’s Upcharge as a Service. So right off the bat, an item that is part of SAP Cloud is a problematic item to use. Secondly, beyond the very poor financial terms of SAP Cloud, SAP Cloud is a highly inefficient PaaS to use. Therefore the connection between SAP API Management and SAP Cloud is a bit of a deal breaker for us.

Sharing Mobile Data, IoT and Production Data with SAP API Management?

SAP really only has control over one of these three areas. They have nearly no IoT business, they are a nonentity in mobile. Therefore this proposed ability to share SAP data among these three areas is not persuasive. The whole “sharing real-time data” statement is very much not educational. Any interface can be scheduled to run in batch or in real time.

Real Time Analytics?

Analytics can be run real time, which is called a refresh….but what does this have to do with SAP API Management?

Manage Your Entire Ecosystem of Customers and Suppliers?

SAP has the most difficult to integrate products in enterprise software. As for collaboration, SAP’s SNC product is no longer functional. Ariba is in decline and has never extended much beyond indirect procurement. In fact, placing one’s data into SAP is one of the best ways to reduce one’s interaction with outside entities. Therefore will all of these areas be magically improved by using an API management tool like Apigee, or SAP API Management? This seems like quite a stretch.

SAP and Microservices with SAP API Management

This quote is from the Apigee website.

“Many existing and legacy services are not built for modern scale. Consequently, enterprises are adapting legacy services for modern use by breaking up monolithic applications into microservices. In most cases, however, there are already many applications taking advantage of services from the monoliths. The transition to microservices must be done in a way that makes it seamless—invisible to those other applications and developers using the monolith services.

Design and build APIs that developers love. Easily create API proxies and visually configure or code API policies as steps in the API flow. Customize API behavior using JavaScript, Python, or Node.js. Transform from or to any protocol including SOAP, REST, XML binary, and custom protocols.”

There are several problems with this quote.

Let us list them.

  1. Companies are breaking monolithic applications into microservice….but not SAP customers. SAP is firmly a series of monolithic applications, and there is no movement afoot to break them into microservices. What SAP is doing is co-opting the terms around microservices without actually becoming microservice in their design. This is the same issue with using the term containers with SAP. It is not a thing that is presently done with SAP. Secondly, SAP projects have all manner of higher priority items they need to invest in, such as evaluating code prior to S/4HANA implementations. It is unlikely that microservices area true emphasis area for SAP or their customers.
  2. SAP does not use Python or Node.js. They have documentation around SOAP, REST and XML but they are not a “thing” on SAP projects. SAP uses a language called ABAP that has nothing to do with anything mentioned in this quote, along with some Java. And ABAP is distinctly not appropriate for and web development.
  3. SAP is about creating interfaces with ABAP, sometimes to IDOCS which are hierarchical files that require extensive transformation. SAP has not changed its integration much since the 1990s in a way that has meant much for projects (new products have been introduced, but none of them have been competitive with custom integration using programming rather than interfaces, which is a topic we covered in the article How Non Programming Integration Hurts SAP Projects.


We did not evaluate Apigee for this analysis. Apigee may be a great product. However, it does not fit with how SAP operates and its technology foundations. The fact that SAP is reselling Apigee (and combining it with SAP Cloud) really only means that SAP is offering customers the opportunity to be upcharged for a product it has nothing to do with. It never makes sense to purchase a product through SAP, because SAP will exaggerate the price and also the claims made by the actual software vendor.

By connecting Apigee/SAP API Management to the SAP Cloud, they drastically reduced the value of Apigee. Not only will SAP demand an upcharge for Apigee, but they will upcharge customers on any usage of APIs that are developed by Apigee as they will consume cloud services.

The fundamental problem is that SAP does not work anything like the environment that Apigee was designed for. Apigee is designed to manage services run from cloud service providers like AWS and GCP using modern development approaches under the construct of openness.

This is the exact opposite of how SAP environments work.

Now, we should mention that we/Brightwork is very much a supporter of the model proposed by Apigee. And we wrote two books about how to bring cloud services to SAP and Oracle environments and address the topics of microservices and containers and new development approaches taking place in the cloud in great detail. So we have no disagreement with the model presented by Apigee. However, this cannot be effectively performed within SAP’s construct. SAP had a comparative advantage in ERP systems, and it is attempting to use the account control built up from its ERP heritage to extend and insert itself into the cloud. Customers should be careful not to let SAP do this because so far, SAP has added nothing to the cloud except cloud confusion. The leaders in the cloud are far away from SAP in technology and approach. In fact, SAP should be considered an anti-cloud company. And the more customers allow SAP to insert themselves into their cloud, the more the cloud will turn into a negative ROI item that is entirely controlled by SAP.

And all of this is why we are predicting so much cloud expenditure will be wasted through SAP customers taking advice from SAP and their consulting partners on the topic of the cloud.

  • SAP is a non-starter as a cloud provider or cloud thinker. Most of what SAP states about the cloud is not correct or helpful.
  • Customers that want to use Apigee or a similar tool along with innovative cloud service providers for new development should absolutely do this and then connect this SAP independent development back to SAP. However, they should not touch SAP API Management with a ten-foot pole.

The Problem: A Lack of Fact-Checking of SAP

There are two fundamental problems around SAP. The first is the exaggeration of SAP, which means that companies that purchased SAP end up getting far less than they were promised. The second is that the SAP consulting companies simply repeat whatever SAP says. This means that on virtually all accounts there is no independent entity that can contradict statements by SAP.

Being Part of the Solution: What to Do About SAP API Management

We can provide feedback from multiple SAP accounts that provide realistic information around SAP products — and this reduces the dependence on biased entities like SAP and all of the large SAP consulting firms that parrot what SAP says. We offer fact-checking services that are entirely research-based and that can stop inaccurate information dead in its tracks. SAP and the consulting firms rely on providing information without any fact-checking entity to contradict the information they provide. When SAP or their consulting firm are asked to explain these discrepancies, we have found that they further lie to the customer/client and often turn the issue around on the account, as we covered in the article How SAP Will Gaslight You When Their Software Does Not Work as Promised.

If you need independent advice and fact-checking that is outside of the SAP and SAP consulting system, reach out to us with the form below or with the messenger to the bottom right of the page.

Financial Disclosure

Financial Bias Disclosure

Neither this article nor any other article on the Brightwork website is paid for by a software vendor, including Oracle, SAP or their competitors. As part of our commitment to publishing independent, unbiased research; no paid media placements, commissions or incentives of any nature are allowed.

Search Our Other SAP Integration Content


AWS and Google Cloud Book

How to Leverage AWS and Google Cloud for SAP and Oracle Environments

Interested in how to use AWS and Google Cloud for on-premises environments, and why this is one of the primary ways to obtain more value from SAP and Oracle? See the link for an explanation of the book. This is a book that provides an overview that no one interested in the cloud for SAP and Oracle should go without reading.