How Accurate Was SAP on In Memory Computing?

Executive Summary

  • For years SAP has stated that on HANA and in-memory computing.
  • In this article, we review the accuracy of this claim. 

What SAP Said About SAP on In-Memory Computing

When SAP introduced HANA has continuously claimed that HANA was completely different than what had come before it. It claimed that a primary reason for this was that HANA was “in memory.”

The Truth About In-Memory Computing?

As we covered in the article How to Understand Why In-Memory Computing is a Myth,

“Calling HANA “in-memory computing” is the same as saying “bullet based shooting,” when discussing firearms.”

All computing is in memory there is no form of computing that is performed without memory because the results would be unacceptable. On this computer being used to type this sentence, the program has been loaded into memory. HANA is differentiated from other databases in that it loads more of the tables into memory, but it does not load all of the tables. Secondly, there is no performance benefit that has been demonstrated from HANA by following this approach over competing database offerings.

Conclusion and Calculation

SAP receives a 0% accuracy rating for the use of the term in-memory computing.

Link to the Parent Article

This is one of many research articles on a specific topic, that support a larger research calculation. For the overview of the research calculation for all of the SAP topics that were part of the study, see the following primary research A Study into SAP’s Accuracy.

Financial Disclosure

Financial Bias Disclosure

Neither this article nor any other article on the Brightwork website is paid for by a software vendor, including Oracle, SAP or their competitors. As part of our commitment to publishing independent, unbiased research; no paid media placements, commissions or incentives of any nature are allowed.