Why Did Muslims Lose Their Minds Over The Admission That The Koran is Not Perfectly Preserved Since the 7th Century

Last Updated on August 23, 2021 by Shaun Snapp

Executive Summary

  • Muslims have repeatedly stated that the Koran was perfectly preserved since the time of Mohammed.
  • Once this was exposed as false, several Muslims lost their minds and wanted this fact censored.

Introduction

Muslims have been lying to both Muslims and non-Muslim audiences by promoting the ridiculous belief that the Koran has been perfectly preserved since Mohammed and that there is only one Koran.

The Islamic Melt Down

In this video, David Wood explained what happened when it became public that Muslims had been lying. Then Muslims were shown telling people to suppress the fact that there are multiple versions of the Koran. Muslims were caught covering up and lying about this fact and trying to keep this information out. 

There were interesting comments made by Muslims who were angry about being teased about this admission, which led to Muslims’ comments.

  1. Critics should perform sexual acts on each other.
  2. Prayers that critics would catch a disease or illness.
  3. That once Muslims take over, non-Muslims will be executed.

Muslims Lie to Non-Muslims and Muslims About Being Caught Admitting There are Many Versions of the Koran

Muslims are constantly lying about the Koran and Hadith when Yasir Qadhi is caught admitting that the perfectly preserved Koran’s standard story then tries to erase this admission from public view. 

Here is one video that describes the admissions in more detail than in the David Wood video.

Observe the ending of this video where the presented explains how Muslims are constantly engaging in deception to keep negative information from getting out.

Let Us Not Go Overboard in Pretending that Christianity Does not Mislead its Followers.

As for the presenter’s statement that this does not occur with the bible and Christianity, I do not agree with that because back in history, you could be killed for just translating the trafficking in translated bibles. Secondly, to suppress embarrassing passages, priests and practitioners have cherry-picked and deliberately left out passages that they don’t want anyone to know.

It is true that at least in areas of the country that are not rural, one does have the freedom to critique the Bible. However, that is a relatively recent phenomenon. There has been enormous persecution of atheists by Christians, with Christians immediately assuming that any atheist is unethical or some type of satan worshiper.

This covers the admission as well. 

Notice how he points out that there is no “red line,” which means unless the history of the Koran is only interpreted by Muslims who will not critique the Koran, they will point out that as Yasir Qadhi says.

“The emperor has no clothes and that makes no sense.”

Yasir Qadhi then points out that Islamic scholars get to a point where once you do a deep dive, it becomes “awkward.”

And what is this awkwardness?

That the story about perfect preservation is false, why would that be awkward? Oh, because Islamic scholars have been lying to Muslims about this fact. 

Time to Switch into Arabic When There is Something to Hide?

Also, notice that he begins moving into what appears to be Arabic.

Why is Yasir Qadhi doing this? He keeps moving from English to something that he knows the western audience that he definitely does not want them to know. 

The Lie About Perfect Preservation is Because of Islamophobia?

Finally, after Yasir Qadhi  is caught self exposing the truth around the Koran, he goes on the defensive and blames “Islamophobes.” This is part of taqiyya, so lying to the non-Muslim, but lying to Muslims. 

In this video, the following quotes from emails are revealed that show a conspiracy to keep this information from being placed out in public.

Observe also that anyone who critiques Islam based on what amounts to a lie about perfect preservation is declared an Islamophobe in one of the comments by a Muslim.

Your Choice, Either Be a Muslim or a Compliant Liberal Muslim Apologist or an Islamophobe

In Islam, there are two categories of people.

Category # 1: A Muslim

This is a person who believes in Islam.

Category #2: A Liberal Muslim Apologist

This is the type of person who says that all criticism of Islam is racism.

These women cannot even believe the question of Islam or feminism. As if the two items have no contradiction with one another. 

Category #3: A Liberal Muslim Apologist

The final category is those who understand something about Islam but don’t like it or agree with it, and those are Islamophobes. And the more you know, and the more you can argue, the more “hateful” and Islamophobic you are. There is no valid criticism of Islam, no matter what the knowledge level of the critic. 

No Discussion in Public?

Observe the comments which say that the topic of the false claim of preservation

“Cannot be discussed in public.”

And why is this?

Because Muslims want to lie about perfect preservation, and if the reality of perfect preservation is known and is “public,” this keeps them from being able to continue to lie about it. Also, note that Yasir Qadhi stated he had made a.

“poor choice of words,”

..and a commenter stated he was not becoming of a scholar.

Interesting, because Yasir Qadhi did everything he could to try to lie and cover up the topic, even switching into what I assume is Arabic. The critique offered that the authorities who speak to Muslims are misleading them, and practicing Muslims need to stop relying on them.

How Likely Was the Story of Perfect Preservation?

The Koran is roughly 1400 years old. It was written by people with low literacy, and none of it by Mohammed as he was illiterate. And none of the Koran was written during the life of Mohammed.

Observe the following quotation.

Shortly after the prophet’s death, the Quran was compiled by the companions, who had written down or memorized parts of it.[25] Caliph Uthman established a standard version, now known as the Uthmanic codex, which is generally considered the archetype of the Quran known today. There are, however, variant readings, with mostly minor differences in meaning.

According to hadith and Muslim history, after Muhammad immigrated to Medina and formed an independent Muslim community, he ordered many of his companions to recite the Quran and to learn and teach the laws, which were revealed daily.

It is related that some of the Quraysh who were taken prisoners at the Battle of Badr regained their freedom after they had taught some of the Muslims the simple writing of the time. Thus a group of Muslims gradually became literate.

Following Muhammad’s death in 632, a number of his companions who knew the Quran by heart were killed in the Battle of Yamama by Musaylimah. The first caliph, Abu Bakr (d. 634), subsequently decided to collect the book in one volume so that it could be preserved.

Thus, a group of scribes, most importantly Zayd, collected the verses and produced a hand-written manuscript of the complete book. – Wikipedia

So they not only had crude writing and organization tools, but it had to be written from memory and recitations. There was a strong motivation to create a document of the revelations because a battle at Yamama killed so many that had recited many of the verses. The Koran was written under difficult circumstances for writing. Then it had to be passed down from its original creation. The idea that everything would be perfectly preserved really never made much sense.

Furthermore, various versions include parenthetical comments that are also not part of the Koran and are intended normally to make the Koran less offensive. These, of course, have nothing to do with the original Koran.

When a Sheep Came into a Tent and Ate Part of the Koran

In this video, David Wood describes how it states part of the Koran was eaten by a sheep. Clearly, that part of the Koran was not “perfectly preserved.” 

Muslims receive our Golden Pinocchio Award for not only lying about the perfect preservation of the Koran (which they proposed was much better than the Torah or New or Old Testament, which had all become “corrupted.” 

Conclusion

The story of perfect preservation does not make any sense because it is acknowledged by the Islamic sources that there were major gaps between when the Koran was revealed and documented. Mohammed’s followers had to be taught how to write by those that they captured. The Koran origin makes it abundantly clear that the Koran was not perfectly preserved even when it was first written as its source for decades was oral.

It would be such a huge issue if there are multiple versions of the Koran that are not clear until you realize it has been used to criticize the books of other religions by Muslims. Muslims have repeatedly proposed that other religious documents that are not Muslim are “corrupted.” This has been a major point for Muslims to claim supremacy over other religions. And now it has been exposed as fake.

What is quite apparent is that neither Yasir Qadhi nor any of the other comments care about what is true. As we have found from our research, the least reliable sources on Islam are Muslims. Muslim requires unending lying and unending suppression, censorship, and intimidation of those that would critique Islam.