- SuccessFactors has recently been migrated to HANA.
- SAP is using this to promote HANA, but what are the real reasons for the move.
Although press releases on SAP’s website are only semi-reliable.
Analysis of the SuccessFactors HANA Migration
So first, this is quite recent. Second, we have it from several resources that worked for SAP that the SuccessFactors team resisted HANA for years because they did not think it would do anything for them or for their customers.
And of course, it won’t.
HANA will do nothing for SuccessFactors except increase the maintenance overhead for SuccessFactors.
SuccessFactors is a lightweight application and it outside of HANA’s wheelhouse. And as we covered in numerous articles, HANA has no performance advantage over databases like Oracle and DB2.
Getting Teased by Larry Ellison
Larry Ellison had repeatedly teased SAP about how SuccessFactors ran on Oracle, and other SAP acquisitions still ran on Oracle, which we covered in the article Larry Ellison on SAP and Salesforce Paying Oracle for DB Licenses.
“SAP does not use HANA in the cloud very much. I know that because they keep paying us. They paid us again, this quarter, for Oracle for Concur, Oracle for Ariba, Oracle for SuccessFactors,” he said, naming three cloud companies that SAP acquired over the past few years to jump start its cloud business.”If they’re using HANA for anything, I don’t know about it,” Ellison chuckled.”
This was embarrassing for SAP, and Hasso hates being teased by Larry Ellison — and it does look bad.
And this is why SF was moved to HANA…for PR for HANA.
Is This a Real Port of All SAP Customers?
There is a second question as to what customers are being ported to HANA. As was described by a contact.
“It looked to be like a separate SuccessFactors instance on the cloud SOLELY for use by SAP themselves.”
So let us review the information contained in the press release.
“About 95,000 SAP employees are testers of this cloud solution, which enables them to take control of their own personal HR and employment details, making it easy to initiate, update, and complete their own data changes.”
So SuccessFactors is being tested as of September 2018? SAP was testing the use of HANA for its internal operations.
This quote from March 2018 in Diginomica discusses how the plans to migrate to HANA have been delayed.
“It seems the project had lost momentum by the time Wilson came on board last summer, but she insists that it’s now back on track, mainly because she sees real benefits from moving ahead with it. Already a significant number of customer instances have migrated across, although the largest, as was always the plan, will be the last to move, she tells me.
Three thousand instances is certainly a big advance on the first nine that Kovalevsky told me had been moved back in October 2016. But one has to wonder what exactly was happening throughout 2017, when the migration was originally planned to take place. Not very much of any substance was happening, apparently, but the reasons for that remain an unexplained mystery.
That hiatus has allowed other applications to increase their HANA footprint, and as Wilson explains, that creates a new incentive for SuccessFactors to complete its migration. There are also proof points with S/4 HANA for what can be achieved on the HANA platform. To that extent, by delaying, SuccessFactors is now less of a ‘guinea pig’ for running HANA at scale than it would have been a year ago.”
So something is happening with HANA and SuccessFactors, but it’s not conclusive, and certainly, any information released by SAP is going to overstate how much HANA is being used for SuccessFactors for PR purposes.
Why Was SAP Business One Ported to HANA?
SAP did the same thing for BusinessOne. BusinessOne is sold into midmarket accounts, where HANA is barely found. HANA is the most expensive database that works with SAP and is priced out of mid-market accounts. So why would it make any sense to port BusinessOne to HANA? Again, the reason is for PR.
This port was performed was not for actual use by BusinessOne customers.
The Problem with SAP’s Strategy
And this has been the problem with SAP’s strategy — it has been centered around propping up HANA in multiple dimensions because HANA is really just a liability. It is a liability for customers but also a liability for SAP, which should focus on applications.
One thing that should be questioned is why did the SuccessFactors team resist HANA for so long? HANA was introduced in 2011. SuccessFactors was acquired in the same year. Why did it take 7 to 8 years for this to occur? SAP would prefer if people did not ask this question.
SAP has been undermining its business and causing great internal strife and confusion in order to prop up HANA. The HANA group inside of SAP has been pulling resources from the other application teams, and the reports from the field show constant problems with HANA. People that decry that recent firings of HANA employees from SAP miss the point that HANA can almost be viewed as a parasite on the rest of the SAP business.
The Problem: A Lack of Fact-Checking of SAP
There are two fundamental problems around SAP. The first is the exaggeration of SAP, which means that companies that purchased SAP end up getting far less than they were promised. The second is that the SAP consulting companies simply repeat whatever SAP says. This means that on virtually all accounts there is no independent entity that can contradict statements by SAP.
The Necessity of Fact Checking
We ask a question that anyone working in enterprise software should ask.
Should decisions be made based on sales information from 100% financially biased parties like consulting firms, IT analysts, and vendors to companies that do not specialize in fact-checking?
If the answer is “No,” then perhaps there should be a change to the present approach to IT decision making.
In a market where inaccurate information is commonplace, our conclusion from our research is that software project problems and failures correlate to a lack of fact checking of the claims made by vendors and consulting firms. If you are worried that you don’t have the real story from your current sources, we offer the solution.
Financial Bias Disclosure
Neither this article nor any other article on the Brightwork website is paid for by a software vendor, including Oracle, SAP or their competitors. As part of our commitment to publishing independent, unbiased research; no paid media placements, commissions or incentives of any nature are allowed.
Search Our Other HANA Content
Getting to the Detail of TCO
The Mechanics of TCO
- Understand why you need to look at TCO and not just ROI when making your purchasing decision.
- Discover how an application, which at first glance may seem inexpensive when compared to its competition, could end up being more costly in the long run.
- Gain an in-depth understanding of the cost, categories to include in an accurate and complete TCO analysis.
- Learn why ERP systems are not a significant investment, based on their TCO.
- Find out how to recognize and avoid superficial, incomplete or incorrect TCO analyses that could negatively impact your software purchase decision.
- Appreciate the importance and cost-effectiveness of a TCO audit.
- Learn how SCM Focus can provide you with unbiased and well-researched TCO analyses to assist you in your software selection.
- Chapter 1: Introduction
- Chapter 2: The Basics of TCO
- Chapter 3: The State of Enterprise TCO
- Chapter 4: ERP: The Multi-Billion Dollar TCO Analysis Failure
- Chapter 5: The TCO Method Used by Software Decisions
- Chapter 6: Using TCO for Better Decision Making