Using Ivermectin for Chronic Heart Inflammation Caused by the Covid Vaccines

Executive Summary

• The mRNA vaccines did not do anything against covid, but they did cause health problems.
• This article explains how to understand the heart inflammation caused by the covid vaccines and how Ivermectin can help.

Introduction

This article covers the heart inflammation caused by the mRNA covid vaccines and then provides a partial remedy.

What is Myocarditis?

The following quote on myocarditis is from Using Ivermectin for Chronic Heart Inflammation Caused by the Covid Vaccines.

Myocarditis is inflammation of your heart muscle (myocardium). This can weaken your heart muscle, making it more difficult for your heart to pump. This rare condition can affect people quickly or slowly over time.

Myocarditis is different from other types of inflammation because each kind happens in a different part of your heart.

Pericarditis affects the sac around your heart.

Endocarditis is an infection or inflammation of your heart valves.

How Safe Are the Vaccines?

The safety of vaccines is covered in the article How Safe Are the Vaccines?

Spike Proteins Galore: Was the Design of the mRNA Vaccines Incompetent?

Not only are the vaccines dangerous, but their overall design makes little sense, as explained in the following quotation from Doctors 4 Covid Ethics.

Against the background of this well-known toxicity, it is very peculiar that all of the current gene-based vaccines, including mRNA-1273, were designed to induce the expression of functionally active spike protein in the cells of our bodies1 rather than of a “toxoid,” that is, an immunogenic but innocuous derivative of the toxic protein. Toxoids can be produced with simple means and have been successfully used as vaccines for a long time, for example with diphtheria and tetanus, whose eponymous toxins can be rendered non-toxic by facile chemical modification.

With modern methods of molecular biology, it should have been easy enough to create a non-toxic spike protein derivative for vaccination. The concerns about vaccine-induced spike protein toxicity are not at all merely hypothetical. Blood plasma levels of S1 detected in vaccinated persons are comparable to those observed in severe cases of the viral infection.

Aside from the direct toxicity of the spike protein, we must expect additional harm due to immune reactions against it. If the protein is expressed within vascular endothelial cells—the innermost cell layer of the blood vessels—then an immune reaction to it can destroy these cells.

Immune system reactions to the endothelial cells are a primary cause of Atherosclerosis, as I cover in the article Considering Atherosclerosis as an Autoimmune Disorder.

Aside from the direct toxicity of the spike protein, we must expect additional harm due to immune reactions against it. If the protein is expressed within vascular endothelial cells—the innermost cell layer of the blood vessels—then an immune reaction to it can destroy these cells. Direct spike protein toxicity is significant because it does not involve an immune reaction and therefore can be triggered right away even in persons without pre-existing immunity.

The immune attack mechanism will be particularly dangerous in persons with pre-existing immunity.

Such immunity can arise from infection with the SARS-CoV- 2 virus or from a previous injection of vaccine.

In addition, cross-immunity induced by other coronaviruses may also promote cell destruction through immune attack.

The Technical Effect of the Spike Proteins from the Vaccines

This quote is from the article Be Aware of SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein: There is More than Meets the Eye.

However, recent reports have raised some skepticism as to the biologic actions of the spike protein and the types of antibodies produced.

One paper reported that certain antibodies in the blood of infected patients appear to change the shape of the spike protein so as to make it more likely to bind to cells..

..while other papers showed that the spike protein by itself (without being part of the corona virus) can damage endothelial cells and disrupt the blood-brain barrier.

Clotting Caused by the mRNA Vaccines

This earlier report also found high uptake in the ovaries, which are not specifically mentioned in the EMA report on Moderna’s vaccine. It is generally accepted that, in COVID-19 disease, the spike protein of the virus triggers vascular lesions and blood clotting.

A prominent clinical manifestation of blood clotting is myocardial infarction (heart attack). Another form of cardiac involvement, also connected to the spike protein but purely inflammatory rather than related to clotting, is myocarditis.

First Hand Accounts of Heart Inflammation by an MD

This quote is from the article What Can Megyn Kelly’s Adverse Reaction Teach Us About Vaccine Safety?

Before long, I started having more and more friends from around the country reach out to me sharing that someone they knew had died suddenly after the vaccine (most frequently from a heart attack) and wanting to know if it could be linked to the vaccine. At this point, I began to suspect the primary issue with the vaccines would be autoimmune in nature and or due to the previously mentioned alterations of physiologic zeta potential which led to complications like microclots.

I then decided I needed to find the time to shadow one of these doctors and was able to do so with rheumatologist. What I saw was very striking—it seemed that around 25%-30% of her patients (some of whom were my coworkers) had either developed a new autoimmune condition after the vaccine or had a long existing (and stable) autoimmune condition become much worse (e.g., one was hospitalized and didn’t remember most of the hospitalization), and frequently required the rheumatologist to change them to a stronger medicine.

Oddly however, despite a great deal of evidence linking the vaccine to autoimmunity, I have thus far only come across one doctor who was willing to publicly acknowledge this.

those with pre-existing autoimmune conditions were instead told it was urgent for them to vaccinate since they were immune suppressed and at a higher risk of getting COVID-19.

Studies on the Post Vaccination Increased Inflammation

An Israeli government study which found that 24.2% of those receiving a booster developed an exacerbation of a pre-existing autoimmune condition.

A rheumatologic database published in the BMJ showed that 37% of patients had an adverse response to COVID vaccination, and 4.4% of those vaccinated experienced an exacerbation of a pre-existing autoimmune condition.

Heart surgeon Dr. Steven Gundry performed a test that utilizes inflammatory markers to predict the risk of an acute coronary syndrome (e.g., a heart attack) in the next five years on 566 patients and found that before vaccination their risk averaged 11%, while afterward, it averaged 25%.

Hiding the Heart Inflammation from the Vaccines from the Public

This is why the CDC has been hiding the information on this issue from the public, as is explained in the article CDC Refuses to Release Updated Information on Post-COVID Vaccination Heart Inflammation.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is refusing to release updated information on reported cases of myocarditis and pericarditis following COVID-19 vaccination.

The agency has regularly conveyed the number of post-vaccination myocarditis and pericarditis cases to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which it helps manage, as it has consulted with its advisers on updates to the vaccines.

Asked for the information, a CDC spokesman pointed to a CDC study that covers data only through Oct. 23, 2022. That study identified nine reports of myocarditis or pericarditis following vaccination with one of the bivalent COVID-19 vaccines, which were introduced in September 2022. Seven of the reports were verified by medical review. “When appropriate, the updated safety data will be published,” the spokesman told The Epoch Times in an email.

“The CDC has acknowledged that heart inflammation is a complication of mRNA COVID-19 shots and, yet, the only published data released by CDC officials about that complication is a seven week study that ended on Oct. 23, 2022. Where is more specific myocarditis/pericarditis data related to bivalent COVID shots for the past 10 months?” Barbara Loe Fisher, co-founder and president of the National Vaccine Information Center, told The Epoch Times via email.

I am tired of the CDC and FDA deciding what information the public needs and doesn’t need. This is precisely the information that parents need to have especially when there are still schools and activities mandating these shots. This is evil playing out right before our eyes,” Kim Witczak, a drug safety advocate who runs the nonprofit Woodymatters, told The Epoch Times in an email.

She added, “The CDC’s response of ‘when appropriate, the updated safety data will be published’ is unacceptable and they wonder why there is vaccine hesitancy and lack of trust in public health officials.”

The Standardized Lying that MDs Do on the Topic of Side Effects

This is found in the quote from the article A Primer on Medical Gaslighting.

It is an enormous personal investment to become a physician and it is extremely difficult for someone who goes through that to acknowledge that much of what they learned is highly questionable.

Similarly, no well-intentioned doctor wants to harm a patient, and since they often do, the reflexive psychological coping mechanism is to deny the possibility of each injury that occurs (discussed further here).

Understanding the CDC’s Historical Behavioral Pattern in Hiding Beneficial Treatments

Since the beginning of the covid pandemic, the CDC has consistently hidden information when it did not support the vaccines. If the CDC withholds this information, the only possible conclusion is that the information places the vaccines in an unfavorable light. How the CDC hid the mounting data on heart inflammation — or myocarditis from the vaccines is a perfect example. These quotes are from the article Myocarditis and COVID-19 Vaccines: How the CDC Missed a Safety Signal and Hid a Warning.

Important Point #1: Health Authorities Ignored the Danger Signals

COVID-19 vaccines cause heart inflammation, U.S. authorities now acknowledge.

But after being warned in early 2021 about a “large number” of cases among healthy, young people in Israel after COVID-19 vaccination, authorities did not immediately alert the public while also failing to detect a safety signal that was present in the United States, an Epoch Times investigation has found.

Even after deaths from myocarditis—inflammation of the heart—were reported and myocarditis was designated as a likely side effect of the shots, U.S. officials kept recommending vaccination for virtually the entire populace.

Something to add to this is that the vaccines were never tested for safety before being rolled out.

Pfizer and Moderna’s clinical trials were rigged, and adverse events were removed from their submitted report to the FDA and other global health authorities.

Important Point #2: Ignoring The VAERS Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System

The CDC, America’s public health agency, was warned by Israel on Feb. 28, 2021, about a “large number” of myocarditis cases after Pfizer COVID-19 vaccination, documents obtained by The Epoch Times show. The CDC and FDA are supposed to monitor data from VAERS, which officials have described as the country’s “early warning system” for possible vaccine problems.

But they failed to detect a safety signal for myocarditis after COVID-19 vaccination that triggered on Feb. 18, 2021, when using a statistical analysis method called Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR), according to archived VAERS data from the National Vaccine Information Center, The Epoch Times confirmed.

“Once the safety signal comes up, why not start warning the public about the fact that ‘hey, you can take it if you want, but understand that there is this risk that we have discovered and we are looking into it,'” Dr. Anish Koka, an American cardiologist, told The Epoch Times.

One possible motivation for not fully examining the issue was that it could have led to a halt in vaccination. The CDC and FDA essentially imposed a pause on Johnson & Johnson’s shot on April 13, 2021, after a small number of blood clotting cases.

The answer is obvious: the medical authorities are working for the vaccine manufacturers – not for the public. They are government agencies only to the degree that they are taxpayer-funded – but not taxpayer-controlled.

In addition, the FDA and CDC also told people not to look into VAERS for themselves, as I cover in the article The Medical Establishment Resents the Calculation of Risk Using VAERS.

Important Point #3: VAERS Had So Many Myocarditis Reports, It Created a Backlog

A day after Dr. Walensky’s unambiguous statement, CDC officials privately acknowledged the difficulty in processing VAERS reports because so many had been lodged.

“Due to the large number of reports that we are receiving at this time, processing is taking longer than usual,” one official said. The message was sent to a woman who said she’d filed a VAERS report for her son’s myocarditis on April 21 but that the report had still not appeared in the system days later.

Exploding Myocarditis Cases

“Providers aren’t reporting these cases to VAERS,” Dr. John Su, one of the CDC’s top vaccine safety officials, wrote to colleagues on May 17, 2021. He also wrote that the “myocarditis thing” was “exploding.”

The number of myocarditis cases was so significant that it swamped the system. However, even with the system swamped, neither the FDA nor CDC notified anyone of this.

Important Point #4: JAMA Refuses the Publish on the Myocarditis Cases

Case reports were frequently published months after cases actually happened, despite being submitted to journals as early as Feb. 16, 2021, data from the journals show.

Some journals refused to publish other papers. Dr. Dimitri Christakis, editor-in-chief of JAMA Pediatrics, told CDC officials that he had “rejected” a case series while saying he’d “welcome” one from the agency, emails obtained by The Epoch Times show.

JAMA or the Journal of the American Medical Association would have welcomed one from the CDC, but of course, the CDC would never write a paper on this topic as they were actively hiding it.

This shows that pharmaceutical interests remotely control JAMA.

Important Point #5: Myocarditis Cases Plunge When The Number of Doses Were Cut to One

In Hong Kong, for example, authorities scaled back recommendations from two doses to one. They saw the number of myocarditis cases plunge.

See the following table.

This table is from the study Myocarditis Following COVID-19 BNT162b2 Vaccination Among Adolescents in Hong Kong.

Important Point #6: Myocarditis Cases Reported All Over the World — Right in Lockstep With Vaccinations

In The Nordic Areas

Nordic researchers soon after reported excess rates as high as 274 per million among young males who received two shots.

Some researchers grouped cases by vaccine type and discovered Moderna recipients were more likely to experience myocarditis.

In Israel

In Israel, researchers found evidence of heart injury in two of 324 participants.

In Germany

In Germany, researchers detected a person with pericarditis in a cohort of 41 volunteers.

In Japan

In Japan, two people in a cohort of about 3,800 people had myocarditis.

In Switzerland

And in Switzerland, one in 35 health care workers had signs of heart injury.

Understanding The Relationship Between Clotting and Myocarditis

Now let us return to this quote, which I expand upon in my article How Effective Are the COVID-19 Vaccines?

Since all of the COVID vaccines induce the production of active spike protein, they, too, must be expected to cause heart attacks and myocarditis; and in fact both VAERS and EudraVigilance document a large number of cases. (the two systems that monitor side effects in the US (VAERS) and Europe (EudraVigilance))

Rapid uptake of the vaccine into the bloodstream implies a risk of blood clotting; 

the depletion of lymphocytes in the spleen and the blood suggests immunosuppression; 

penetration of the blood brain barrier indicates a risk of neurological damage; 

liver damage as well as risks to fertility and to pregnancy are manifest in the animals and must be expected in humans also.

We must stress again that each of these risks could readily be inferred from the cited limited preclinical data, but were not followed up with appropriate in-depth investigations. – Doctors 4 Covid Ethics

How Ivermectin Interferes With the Spike Protein

In this video, Dr. Campbell shows the numerous mechanisms by which Ivermectin works against the spike proteins.

Understanding The Chronic Heart Inflammation from the Spike Proteins

One of the most significant issues with mRNA vaccines is they cause heart inflammation. This means that the vaccines will be responsible not only for deaths in the short term but for deaths in the long term. 

For this reason, it is essential to neutralize the impact of the mRNA vaccines on your body.

Conclusion

Those who followed the advice of the health authorities, establishment media, and Big Tech to take the vaccines were enormously deceived. The issues with heart inflammation from the vaccines were deliberately hidden from the public. For those who took the vaccines, several things can be done to reduce the heart inflammation caused by the mRNA covid vaccines. These things are excellent for fighting heart inflammation and suitable for overall health.

Addressing the Damage

One of the best ways to address the damage caused by the covid vaccines is with Ivermectin. This is the reason I began taking Ivermectin -- before investigating all the other health benefits of the drug. Now, I take Ivermectin for many reasons.

About Our Dosage Calculator and More Information on Ivermectin

The dosage calculators for both cancer and use against the health damage caused by the COVID-19 vaccines -- as well as Ivermectin sourcing, safety, and more (over 140 articles on Ivermectin the most information anywhere on Ivermectin, and 800 total articles on medical and health topics) -- is all accessible at our subscription site.

Our Recommended Source of Supply

• Our approved source for Ivermectin is Summit Products.
• They carry the Ivermectin we tested for bioequivalence 
• (you can read about our testing here) for the active ingredient with the original Merck version but at a much lower price than the Merck version. 
• This source makes Ivermectin much more accessible and has passed our testing.