How Patients Became Confrontational From Being Killed By The NIH Covid Vaccine Protocols

Executive Summary

  • The NIH treatment protocols are deadly for covid patients.
  • Patients have become “problematic” by not always passively accepting this dangerous treatment.


We cover in the article How The US Covid Treatment Protocol Maximized Hospital Admissions and Deaths that the NIH covid treatment protocol kills a high percentage of the people placed on it. As many covid patients have become aware of this, it has caused “friction” between new patients, hospital staff, and hospitals in general.

In an October 2021 article in the progressive outlet Mother Jones, they presented both false information and the view of the corrupt medical establishment on the effectiveness of the US covid treatment protocol.

Our References for This Article

To see our references for this article and related Brightwork articles, visit this link.

Patients And Families of Patients Picking Up On How Deadly the NIH Covid Treatment Protocols Are

He says he also lost another friend to the virus three weeks ago. This time, the hospital put his friend on a ventilator, which he says “destroyed his lungs and he died.” So now he’s in front of the hospital trying to spread the message that hospitals kill. Johnson says he’s not anti-vaccine; he and the other protesters are just interested in freedom of choice. “We’re not ignorant people,” he says. “We’re just wondering why it’s not OK to question.” – Mother Jones

It’s not ok to question because the medical establishment, pharmaceutical companies, and Mother Jones do not want their treatment protocol questioned, nor the vaccine’s effectiveness and safety.

People Who Have Their Parents Killed By The Covid Treatment Protocol Must Be Intimidated By Doctors?

Earlier this month, Leavitt claimed on Facebook that the IHC hospital in St. George had killed her parents, who died within minutes of each other in late September. She wrote that when her mother entered the hospital, the doctor planned to put her on a ventilator and administer Remdesivir. “I gave him a Big Hell NO,” Leavitt wrote. In response, she wrote, the doctor told her that he was going to write “Do not resuscitate” in her mother’s chart, asking, “Is that what you want?” She says the doctor then informed her that if she didn’t want to follow the protocol, her mother didn’t qualify for ICU care, and he moved her to another floor of the hospital to die without receiving Leavitt’s treatments of choice, such as IV vitamins and the deworming drug Ivermectin. – Mother Jones

Has Mother Jones analyzed the covid treatment protocol used by US hospitals?

We ask because it does not appear that Mother Jones knows if this treatment protocol is effective or not. The mortality rate for Remdesivir is roughly similar to if the MD brought out a revolver, put three bullets in it, spun the cylinder, and then pointed at your relative. Under that mathematical likelihood, would you not be justified in tackling the MD?

Mother Jones may want to look up the topic of informed consent. We cover the violation of informed consent in the article How The US Medical Establishment Violated Informed Consent and Coerced Covid Vaccination.

The quote continues.

“Why do hospitals deny proven therapies? Deny patients IV vitamins?” she continued in her Facebook post. “This is a very dark time in the history of healthcare. The equivalent of medical malpractice. They overtreat with deadly drugs. Remdesevier and ventilation. If a patient refuses this protocol, the hospital will then under treat wait and watch the patient die. It’s barbaric, bad medicine.” – Mother Jones

That is easy to answer. The hospitals have no choice in the matter related to covid treatment protocols. They are required to follow the NIH’s protocols and to maximize revenues. If Medicare pays $40,000 to place covid patients on ventilators, they will be placed there. In particular, private hospitals have no objective other than profit maximization. Treatment of conditions is entirely secondary to profits for the hospital. Hospitals are so focused on profits that they won’t pay 5 cents per surgical mask to US mask manufacturers and buy 1 cent masks from China.

Patients Have Politically Incorrect Views On Ventilators And Remdesivir?

In August, Dalley aired a show detailing how she supposedly saved her diabetic husband from murderous hospital staff when he got “COVID pneumonia.” She claims he entered the hospital with extremely low oxygen levels after the Ivermectin he was taking didn’t cure him. (It was just too low a dose, she concluded.) Doctors wanted to put him on a ventilator. Instead, he walked out of the ICU after just three-and-a-half days because when he was admitted, she had demanded that the hospital give him massive, intravenous doses of vitamin C. She provides instructions on her website for people who want to fight a hospital COVID protocol, including advice like, “Don’t let them do Remdesivir. It can cause organ failure,” and “REFUSE THE VENT. Over and over and over and over. Be firm. Be nice. Be firm.” – Mother Jones

There were other treatments aside from Ivermectin that could have been used. Vitamin D (most people are deficient in Vitamin D, which is covered in the article The Cover-Up by the Medical Establishment on Vitamin D Levels, monoclonal antibodies, etc. The items one should use are covered in the article Why Are Some Natural Supplements Treatments Against Covid? However, you won’t get any of these things from hospitals.

Once again, patients have the right to deny treatments they disagree with. The hospitals, the NIH, and Mother Jones can complain about it as much as they like, but that is the patients’ right.

Covid Patients Should Not Fight Deadly Treatments?

In September, the medical director of Park City Hospital in Summit County, which has the highest vaccination rate in the entire state, told the county health board that patients coming into the hospital with COVID were behaving very differently than they had in the past. “We’re seeing hate in their eyes,” Dr. Wing Province told the board, according to the Park Record. Nurses and doctors working in the overburdened ICU were dealing with hostile patients who often didn’t believe they were infected or demanded unproven treatments. Some had even become violent because they believed, as the protesters do, that the hospital was trying to kill them. – Mother Jones

These are not unproven treatments. This is a standard pharma-controlled media explanation. It is sad to see what were previously questioning outlets like Media Jones convert into shills for the medical establishment—the real Mother Jones, for which the magazine is named, fought against the tyranny of unfair employers. However, in the modern age, the magazine that bears her name aligns itself with the powerful rather than questioning the powerful.

It is the opposite, as the treatments in the US treatment protocol are unproven.

You can check the many studies that support these treatments at the website, which is far more authoritative and transparent than anything done by the FDA.

The wonderful thing is that you don’t need to go to a hospital to get any of these treatments. Hospitals do virtually nothing good for COVID patients, even denying them anti-inflammatories, and they kill many COVID patients with their protocol.

The quote continues.

“We had a gal who came in whose oxygen levels were critically low, to the point where she could nearly die if we didn’t give her oxygen,” Province said. “And as our nurses went to her aid to put on oxygen, to put in an IV, and try to stabilize her, she being COVID-positive, spit in our nurse’s face, kicked our nurse in the chest with her foot, and scratched all the technicians and everyone else that were coming in to try to put in an IV.” He described a patient who left the hospital early against medical advice whose family is now suing IHC because doctors refused to give the patient Ivermectin.

Yes, by continually lying to patients, hospitals have lost their credibility. This is a natural response. I have been taking Ivermectin, as I cover in the article How to Use Ivermectin or Protect Against the Covid Vaccines. This is not to protect against COVID-19, as COVID is not a threat to me, but to combat the effects of the vaccines I, unfortunately, took because I wanted to travel. I did not want to get a prescription, so I have been taking cattle Ivermectin for several months and have had no problems.

Patients Are Wrong For Demanding Non-FDA Approved Treatments That Are Far Superior to The FDA Approved Treatments?

One of the anti-vaccine activists asks Rodriguez if he’s from Mexico. When he says yes, she enthuses, “I buy my Ivermectin from Mexico!” She then proceeds to tell him about the drug’s alleged benefits for prevention of a virus that she claimed was released by humans “to harm us.” She and her friend continue to pummel Rodriguez with anti-vaccine and “pro-freedom” propaganda. He listens politely, and later tells me he talked to all of the protesters on the sidewalk after seeing their signs. He told them he agreed that they had the right to avoid vaccines or masks, but, “You might get somebody sick. You don’t have that right.” – Mother Jones

It seems like Mother Jones cannot be bothered to check the many supportive studies of Ivermectin available at

Furthermore, why is being against vaccine propaganda? The vaccines do not work. Secondly, why is pro-freedom propaganda? People have the right not to accept a vaccine. This would not be a problem if the vaccines protected the vaccinated from getting COVID. Still, they do not, as is covered in the article How The Covid Vaccines Do Nothing to Stop The Vaccinated From Getting Or Transmitting Covid.

The Incentives of Centralized and Corrupt Medical Care

The following is from the article How Corruption Dictates the Practice of Medicine.

Medical practice is largely determined by “guidelines” that each physician is expected to follow. In most cases if you follow existing guidelines (ie. don’t treat someone with COVID until they have respiratory failure, then put them on a ventilator and give them remdesivir), you get paid and cannot get in trouble. If you do not follow guidelines, it becomes possible for you to be sued for medical malpractice, health care systems will fire you, and medical boards may take your license.

If you follow those suggestions (which frequently results in most of the visit being taken up to do so), you are paid more by the insurance companies. Since everyone in health care is tight on money, those incentives result in significant pressure being put on physicians from their administrators to follow those suggestions.

The problem is that many of these suggestions encourage doing things I do not believe help patients and often harm them. For example, one of the reasons doctors aggressively push vaccines to their patients is because insurance companies pay them significantly more for all visits if most of their patients (especially children) are vaccinated. Similarly, one of the reasons why hospitals have been so aggressive in forcing ventilation and remdesivir (to the point they will fight expensive lawsuits to continue doing so), is because Medicare, in accordance with the COVID treatment guidelines, pays them a lot more to manage (and then kill) their patients in this way.

This is not just a problem with covid treatment. In the US, the overall medical system has increasingly been taken over by corrupt, powerful interests that push ineffective and dangerous treatments on patients.

MDs must follow the treatment guidelines or be punished.

We are returning to a time when the likelihood of a patient being bettered by medical treatment is declining.

Addressing the Damage

One of the best ways to address the damage caused by the covid vaccines is with Ivermectin. This is the reason I began taking Ivermectin -- before investigating all the other health benefits of the drug. Now, I take Ivermectin for many reasons.

About Our Dosage Calculator and More Information on Ivermectin

The dosage calculators for both cancer and use against the health damage caused by the COVID-19 vaccines -- as well as Ivermectin sourcing, safety, and more (over 140 articles on Ivermectin the most information anywhere on Ivermectin, and 800 total articles on medical and health topics) -- is all accessible at our subscription site.

Our Recommended Source of Supply

  • Our approved source for Ivermectin is Summit Products.
  • They carry the Ivermectin we tested for bioequivalence 
  • (you can read about our testing here) for the active ingredient with the original Merck version but at a much lower price than the Merck version. 
  • This source makes Ivermectin much more accessible and has passed our testing.