The Ivermectin Dosage for Humans Guide

Executive Summary

  • This article covers the factors that play into developing a recommended Ivermectin dosage for humans.

Article Summary

This article covers the appropriate Ivermectin dosage for humans, how health authorities are aligned against Ivermectin, whether there are specific dosages for different cancers, and Ivermectin’s benefits.


We get many questions on Ivermectin dosage. In this article, we will cover the Ivermectin dosage for humans.

The Complications Of Arriving at an Ivermectin Dosage for Humans

The problem is that there are questions on dosage for many applications (cancer, blood thinning, autoimmune disorders, covid vaccine treatment, etc..) for which Ivermectin can be used.

Why Ivermectin is Currently and Will Most Likely Only Ever be Approved by the FDA as an Antiparasitic Drug

Ivermectin is only approved by the FDA as an anti-parasitical and has been for over 50 years. But it is the likelihood is essentially zero that any pharmaceutical company will ever go to the expense to perform a clinical trial on Ivermectin to expand its usage, as there are no profits to be made from such an endeavor -- and that is the only way drugs are approved, a pharmaceutical company must invest the money into performing two clinical trials. The reason for this is that Ivermectin has already lost its patent. 

Pharmaceutical companies are far more likely to fund studies to undermine Ivermectin, as Bill Gates' foundation did with Hydroxychloroquine.

The US Government Health Authorities Are Aligned With Promoting Only Patent Drugs

Studies have continued on Ivermectin, but neither the NIH nor other pharmaceutical companies will fund them.

At the direction of pharmaceutical companies, the FDA actively discourages using Ivermectin and lies to the public about the studies on its effectiveness.

Case Study #1: The FDA’s Statement and Laetrile

This is concisely explained in the quote from William W Vodra, Former Associate Chief Council for the FDA.

No one is going to pay $70,000 for a new cancer drug if they can buy Laetrile for 75 cents.

Laetrile was a drug that was shut down in the 1970s by the medical establishment (specifically Sloan Kettering) that showed promise against cancer. Laetrile is the topic of the documentary The Lie of America's War on Cancer. However, this quote from Vodra is from the 1970s.

Today, the average new chemotherapy drug is over $200,000, and immunotherapy drugs are over $300,000.

What is curious about this admission by Vodra is that it is not made by a pharmaceutical company -- which would be entirely expected. Instead, it is made by a top official at the FDA.

When you can't distinguish quotes from pharmaceutical companies and a drug regulator like the FDA, one has to question how independent that drug regulator is. 

It's apparent that neither the FDA nor NIH cares about the evidence supporting Ivermectin. And this is not just an issue limited to Fenbendazole. While patent drugs constantly have their off-label usage expanded without any studies submitted to the FDA.

Two Different Standards That Are Applied to Drugs

Ivermectin will never expand its off-label use, even though it is legal to do so. See this quote from the FLCCC Alliance on how the double standard is applied. 

Once the FDA approves a prescription medication, federal laws allow any U.S. physician to prescribe the duly approved drug for any reason. In fact, around 30 percent of all prescriptions in the United States are for off-label uses, written by providers exercising their medical judgment. FDA-approved drugs like ivermectin may be prescribed for an unapproved use (“off-label”) when the provider believes it to be medically appropriate for their patients.

This is why the medical establishment finds it so crucial for MDs to give negative reinforcement for using Ivermectin for anything but as an antiparasitic. Ivermectin usage as an antiparasitic is for a much shorter duration and lower dosage than using Ivermectin against cancer. However, by contrast, antidepressants or statins constantly have their usage expanded without any new clinical trials being submitted because they are preferred drugs. 

Not only the MDs that pressure the medical establishment; pharmacies are also pressured. Many pharmacists consider an Ivermectin prescription a "red flag" and a reason to ask more questions. 

The reality is that generic drugs are considered drugs the pharmaceutical industry wants to de-emphasize -- hopefully (that is the hope of the pharmaceutical companies) to be replaced by an on-patent drug at some point in the future. In the case of drugs Paxlovid and Molnupiravir, both were promoted by the medical establishment to replace the generic Ivermectin versus covid, even though both were useless against covid and far more expensive than either Ivermectin or Fenbendazole and were far less safe drugs. The promotion of Paxlovid and Molnupiravir and the impression of Ivermectin by the medical establishment (including the FDA) and the establishment media should tell you all you need to know about how they work. 

The C19Early Clinical Trial Comparison Website

The website tracks clinical trials. It is the best source of information on the studies of the effectiveness based upon clinical trials of different treatments for covid. However, it is more than this - as it is a model for how clinical trials should be communicated to the public so the corrupt medical establishment does not control the information. This is the website the medical establishment does not want you to see because they want to provide false information to the public to suppress the drug they don't make enough profit from. They want to be able to hide the actual results of the clinical trials from the public but then also say they are "following the science."

Even though this website does not track cancer clinical trials, I will use it to demonstrate how the medical establishment suppresses cost-effective treatments. They do this in all areas of medicine, so cancer treatments are not unique.

What The C19Early Website Shows

The website C19Early overturns their arguments on the effectiveness of the medical establishment's recommended treatments. It shows the effectiveness and low cost of treatments they try to hide from the public. This naturally shows them as the pharmaceutical company propagandists they are.

How This Example from Covid Generalizes for Cancer Treatments

Observe the comparative effectiveness of their favored treatments versus those they actively suppress. This example is taken from COVID-19 -- however, the medical authorities work the same way in terms of suppressing low-cost, effective treatments for cancer while promoting the most expensive and least effective -- and, in many cases, utterly ineffective cancer treatments.

Cost Per Life Saved for Covid

Notice that the top treatments per life saved ranked by cost are all-natural items.

  • The reason is simple. Most people are deficient in Melatonin, Vitamin D, Vitamin C, and Zinc. These items address these deficiencies and allow the immune system to function correctly. 
  • Ivermectin is listed as the subsequent most cost-effective treatment. Then HCQ or hydroxychloroquine is next after that. However, remember that the establishment media told us the HCQ was not effective against covid -- the primary reason they provided was that Trump said it was probably effective and that he took it and felt better.

Because the first four items (non-drugs) are much less expensive than Ivermectin or HCQ, they are more effective per dollar than the top four items. Every one of these treatments was suppressed by the medical establishment in favor of drugs like Molnupiravir, Paxlovid, and Remdesivir (the last being part of the official CDC protocol for COVID) -- even though these drugs are highly ineffective and far less safe than the items that scored the highest. Look at the cost per life saved versus the first items on the list. 

This is clear evidence that the medical establishment pushes people towards the most expensive and often far less effective treatments that are profit-maximizing for drug companies. Notice that the drug that was part of the covid protocol was Remdesivir -- as you can see at the end of the list -- has a cost of nearly $1.5 million per life saved. Why is this the recommended drug by the NIH and CDC? It should be obvious. 

The more expensive the treatment, the more likely the drug companies and medical establishment will want people to take that treatment -- and for very obvious reasons - the medical establishment is optimizing around the most expensive treatments. 

I cover this topic with a specific case study in How Merck Falsified the Clinical Trails of Molnupiravir to Replace Ivermectin.

Is There a C19Early Type Website for Cancer Treatments?

Unfortunately, there is no website like C19Early for cancer treatments. If one existed, it would be highly damaging to the claims of the cancer establishment. It would also show roughly the same thing -- with the medical establishment and cancer centers optimizing around the most expensive cancer treatments and not offering any of the lowest cost, most effective treatments. 

Ivermectin and Cancer

In addition to covid, Ivermectin also works against cancer. I cover the specific mechanisms by which it works at the subscription site.

Is There a Different and Specific Dosage for Each Type of Cancer?

One subscriber commented that they expected a specific dosage for cancer. We developed an overall dosage that includes cancer. The dosage above incorporates multiple studies on cancer.

Ivermectin as an Immunomodulator

But, of course, immunomodulation supports the overall immune system and immune response. This is also only one of the ways that Ivermectin works against cancer, as covered in the article By How Many Different Mechanisms Does Ivermectin Fight Cancer? Given all of this, it’s difficult to separate the benefit of Ivermectin only for cancer and to say there should be an Ivermectin dosage for humans specific to cancer prevention and treatment. If we find studies that are performed that provide new information related to Ivermectin and cancer, that changes this. In that case, we will modify our recommended dosage and then break it into multiple dosage recommendations.

  • This is an important insight related to the topic of using Ivermectin.
  • Ivermectin should not be considered a treatment that does just one thing.

How the Potential Beneficial Use of Ivermectin Tends to Expand the More You Know About It

For example, I started off taking Ivermectin to fight the impact of the covid vaccine that I was essentially coerced into taking. However, as I expanded my research into Ivermectin, I realized that Ivermectin is a Jack-of-all-Trades treatment.

At our subscription site, we cover all the different ways Ivermectin works against cancer.

Other Things Ivermectin Does

So, while Ivermectin fights the spike protein from the mRNA vaccines, it does many other things in the body. And this leads to the next point and common question.

This is emphasized by the quote from the FLCCC Alliance on the topic.

In addition to being an effective, broad-spectrum anti-parasitic, many healthcare professionals have been using ivermectin for decades to treat a variety of other diseases.

“Few, if any, other drugs can rival ivermectin for its beneficial impact on human health and welfare,” wrote Andy Crump in The Journal of Antibiotics in 2017.

Crump worked with Satoshi Ōmura, the Japanese microbiologist responsible for discovering ivermectin, for decades.

This was an entirely unremarkable and widely accepted statement back in 2017.

The covid pandemic made what was a previously widely accepted statement controversial. And this leads to the next point and common question.

How Much Focus Do Oncologists Place on the Immune System?

Even cancer-treating MDs themselves have only limited information about the interaction between standard cancer treatments and the immune system -- as they have been told to give treatments by the medical schools and medical authorities. However, both are filled to the absolute heights with financial conflicts from chemotherapy drug manufacturers and radiological equipment manufacturers. Necessarily, MDs focusing on the immune system would deemphasize the standard cancer treatments, which is unacceptable to their employers.

I have reviewed the medical advice provided by medical authorities ranging from the CDC to hospitals to private practice MDs. What I have found is an unsupportable underemphasis on the immune system and optimizing the immune system. 

This is also not exclusive to the coverage of cancer. An excellent example is explained in the article A Comparison of How Much Effort the CDC Puts Into Immunity Versus Vaccines.

Neither cancer treatment nor virology emphasizes the immune system because the immune system is something people already have and can be enhanced with inexpensive items. For example, Dr. Sanjay Gupta on CNN asked about natural immunity, a part of elementary virology; Dr. Fauci said he "did not have a good answer on the topic," which meant that even a person with natural immunity should get the COVID-19 vaccine. 

Therefore, the medical establishment does not want to emphasize something that, while improving health, would do little for their bottom line. At our site, we do the opposite -- we emphasize the immune system over costly treatments. One of the ways to optimize the immune system is with an immunomodulator like Ivermectin. However, other ways to optimize the immune system are covered on the subscription site. 

Important Characteristics of Ivermectin

Let's review the characteristics of Ivermectin.

  1. It is effective against various ailments in addition to general immunomodulators, which means that it supports a functional immune response, neither reacting too much nor too little to threats to the body.
  2. It is one of the safest drugs available, with roughly 45 years of usage information.
  3. It is inexpensive (if you carefully use the right source, as covered in the article Answering the Question of Where to Get Ivermectin.)

Once you look at the benefits, the question is, why wouldn't one want to take Ivermectin every day?

If one looks at the benefits of immunomodulation and anti-inflammation, they are desirable as endless benefits for long-term health.

More About The C19Early Clinical Trial Comparison Website

The website tracks clinical trials. It is the best source of information on the studies of the effectiveness based upon clinical trials of different treatments for covid. However, it is more than this - as it is a model for how clinical trials should be communicated to the public so the extraordinarily corrupt medical establishment does not control the information. And it is the website that the medical establishment would like banned from the Internet.

One of the things the C19Early website showed was that early treatment significantly impacted the outcomes against covid.

The Benefit of Early Treatment

Notice that the earlier the treatment is used, the better the outcomes. Naturally, early treatment is measured in days with a respiratory disease like COVID-19, while in months with a disease like cancer. So the timings are different, but the principle is the same. 

Even though this website does not track cancer clinical trials (unfortunately, no website does), the site holds essential observations. For one, a person's response to covid is like their response to cancer, greatly dependent upon the strength and health of their immune system.

Things like Zinc, Ivermectin, and Fenbendazole all empower the immune system and are, therefore, effective in the treatment and prevention of both COVID and cancer. 

Offering Cancer Prevention as Well as Treatment

What is better than treatment is prevention. For anyone who is concerned with cancer prevention, both a very healthy lifestyle and diet, as well as things like Ivermectin and or Fenbendazole, are things that can be taken both as a treatment and as a preventative. We cover all these topics and the supporting specifics on our subscription website. 

About Our Dosage Calculator and More Information on Ivermectin

The dosage calculators for both cancer and use against the health damage caused by the COVID-19 vaccines -- as well as Ivermectin sourcing, safety, and more (over 140 articles on Ivermectin the most information anywhere on Ivermectin, and 800 total articles on medical and health topics) -- is all accessible at our subscription site.

Our Recommended Source of Supply

  • Our approved source for Ivermectin is Summit Products.
  • They carry the Ivermectin we tested for bioequivalence 
  • (you can read about our testing here) for the active ingredient with the original Merck version but at a much lower price than the Merck version. 
  • This source makes Ivermectin much more accessible and has passed our testing.

Sharing This Article

Share this article with a friend or family member by copying this article link and pasting it into your email so they can read the same information.