What Has Ignorance and Lies by MDs on Covid Treatments Done to Medical Trust?

Last Updated on June 5, 2022 by Shaun Snapp

Executive Summary

  • The medical system’s treatment of covid has been a disaster.
  • People have been denied effective treatment and given ineffective treatments.

Introduction

  • While reviewing the treatments for covid, I found something of interest regarding the natural supplements as effective as drugs like Ivermectin or Vitamin D or several other supplements and treatments deliberately blocked by the medical system.
  • In contrast, ineffective and dangerous treatments like Remdesivir or placing people on ventilators were used instead.

While writing an article on logic for the supplements selected in the article Why Are Some Supplements Treatments Against Covid?, it became apparent how the treatments I covered are primarily related to giving the immune system what it needs to be effective, and how the medical establishment blocked information on this as well, and how they refuse to talk about the immune system, or how to strengthen the immune system, and place all of their emphasis on vaccines — even though vaccines only work to trigger the adaptive immune system.

In this article, I cover the degradation of credibility of both MDs and the overall medical system.

Our References for This Article

If you want to see our references for this article and related Brightwork articles, visit this link.

Obvious Ignorance or Lies on Ivermectin

I have been taking cattle Ivermectin as it is now difficult to obtain under a prescription, and human and livestock Ivermectin are the same molecules. People have been going to hospitals and demanding Ivermectin and getting into arguments with MDs over this topic. However, when they go to hospitals they are told by MDs things the patients know are false, that Ivermectin is not approved by the FDA and that no studies show that Ivermectin works.

The following video explains this.

This video is amusing once you have done the research. These doctors are wearing masks, which as I cover in the article How Effective Are Masks in Reducing the Spread of Covid, and they are unaware of the many studies on Ivermectin being effective against covid, as I cover in the article How Effective is Ivermectin Versus the Pfizer and Moderna Corona Vaccines.

The video segment continually points out that the FDA has not approved Ivermectin for covid, while failing to mention that the pharmaceutical industry entirely controls the FDA and that as I cover in the article How the Media Lied About Japan Not Using Ivermectin for Covonavirus, the countries that have been most effective against covid have used Ivermectin, and not the vaccines.

Finally, even if Ivermectin was utterly ineffective against covid, Ivermectin has five different benefits.

  • Anti Parasitic
  • Anti Bacterial
  • Anti Viral
  • Anti Inflammatory
  • Anti Cancer

Ivermectin should be taken even if one is not concerned with covid as it has so many other benefits.

Not once have I heard any of these benefits mentioned by the medical establishment, who seem intent on telling me Ivermectin is only for livestock.

Continual False Statements on Ivermectin by MDs

The false statements by MDs on the topic of covid and Ivermectin has rapidly decreased their credibility in my eyes and in the eyes of many others. Normally people do not perform so much research when they have an ailment. However, covid is different. It has promoted a great deal of research, and they can see the inaccuracies provided by the medical system.

MDs are “devastated” that people don’t want their pharmaceutical company-controlled advice. People are demanding things that work, like Ivermectin, which is hurting the doctors’ feelings, who are more interested in their relationships with pharma reps that visit them than their patients. 

Seeing MDs make so many false statements about Ivermectin and covid makes me wonder how many other things that MDs say are also not true, particularly when it comes to treatments that are not profit-maximizing to pharmaceutical companies.

It seems that MDs do not see themselves as independent from pharmaceutical companies.

Commentary on the behavior of MDs during the pandemic is critiqued in the following quotation.

Do you trust your doctor anymore? Honestly?

I don’t mean Dr. Anthony Fauci. How can anybody trust him, with all the prevarications, constant shifts in policy and deceptions, not to mention hiding American taxpayer support for gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Virology Lab and other aspects of the doctor’s dark past revealed in great detail in Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s book?

I’m talking about your own personal doctor, the man or woman who has been your friend and trusted counselor for years, maybe decades. How do you feel about that person? Has it changed?

What many are perceiving as a growing mistrust of physicians is one, among many, of the tragic fallouts of the pandemic.

But the great masses of doctors have melted under the pressure of the government, following the party line on the pandemic. If you mention hydroxychlorquine and ivermectin or some other therapeutic or even, in some cases, the apparent superiority of natural immunity, they either don’t hear you or respond condescendingly, then point to the necessity of the vaccine.

At that moment, they are thinking of themselves, of their families, their incomes, their medical licenses, their relationship to their hospital or clinic, medical systems entirely dependent on cooperation, financially and legally, with the ever-changing diktats of the CDC and FDA. – EpochTimes

Shaming Those that Refuse the Covid Vaccines

The title of this video makes it very clear. The New York Times proposes that people in rural areas are dying because they refuse the vaccine.

This video presumes that pharmaceutical companies do not control the health authorities. This video never addresses the evidence of Ivermectin or other therapies that are not on a patent. Like the FDA and CDC, the NYT will only discuss drugs on a patent.

The video is entirely hypocritical. When the people in this video refuse to take the vaccines (going against the grain), the narrator calls them ignorant. Still, when a young woman named Mary goes against her parents and gets the vaccine, she is lauded for having the “courage to go against the grain.”

The New York Times does not address the evidence for the vaccines, the evidence for treatments like Ivermectin, or how to use vitamins to strengthen one’s immune systems. This segment could have been produced by Pfizer or Moderna.

According to the NYT, the presentation is evident. Anyone who does not take the vaccine is a hillbilly.

The NYT video also clearly supports vaccines mandates and supports people being fired if they don’t get vaccinated.

The video also states that…

“One person’s freedom is another person’s death.”

However, if the vaccines worked, why would another unvaccinated person negatively affect the vaccinated?

All other vaccines protect the person vaccinated, and one does not need to have everyone vaccinated to be protected, but not the covid vaccines. This is because the covid vaccines are not vaccines, and they don’t work.

Denying Covid Patients Useful Treatments and Even Quality Nutrition

All of the patients in the NYT video were denied useful treatments because the hospital is prevented from doing so as they are only allowed to use treatments approved by the NIH, CDC, and FDA.

This means highly effective treatments like vitamin D, and zinc, and Ivermectin cannot be used. The hospitals and the health authorities are utterly opposed to anything that will help improve the patient’s immune system, even serving them food that has low nutrient quality. This is covered in the article The Irresponsible Poor Nutrition Quality of Hospital Food.

Supressing Ivermectin as a Treatment

Ivermectin has proven effective against covid, but it is only one of many effective treatments being suppressed by the medical establishment. However, now pharmaceutical companies are developing drugs that attempt to copy the protease inhibiting effect of Ivermectin, so they can see drugs that do part of what Ivermectin does, but are on a patent.

Pushing Remdesivir as a Covid Treatment

And all of this deception on Ivermectin is because they don’t want people taking Ivermectin as it is a generic drug, and they want people paying $3120 per dose for the ineffective and dangerous Remdesivir. Or how about $5,000 per treatment for some convalescent plasma that must be administered through an IV? It shows a negative efficacy against covid, as is covered in the article Why Are Some Natural Supplements Treatments Against Covid? But the FDA did not let that get in the way of approval. Again, at $5,000 per treatment, US tax dollars MUST be used to pay for this ineffective treatment. While Ivermectin must be categorized as only for livestock by the FDA. The FDFA would recommend Remdesivir for horses, except they can’t afford it.

This is also why they have begun warning doctors not to prescribe Ivermectin for covid. Instead, they will approve the ineffective and high side effects of Remdesivir. See the relative safety of Remdesivir using the WHO’s adverse event statistics to understand their false claims in the article How Safe are the Vaccines vs. Ivermectin and Remdesivir.

At the five-minute mark, Pfizer created an anti-viral that attempts to copy Ivermectin, aka “Pfizermectin.” This drug is substantially worse than Ivermectin and is unproven. However, because it is on patent and will be quite expensive, this is the drug Pfizer wants people to take. The two people hosting this show do not understand this topic and don’t realize pharmaceutical companies completely rig their studies. 

It is amazing how few journalists covering pharmaceutical companies and the FDA know the tricks that the actors in this area repeatedly perform.

That shows that the FDA could not care less about drug effectiveness or safety and merely provides false information to drive people away from Ivermectin to ineffective but profit-maximizing drugs for their drug bosses.

Are MDs Ignorant or Lying on Which Covid Treatments Work and Don’t?

One might think that the information on, for example, the ineffectiveness of the vaccines is so good, as I cover in the article How Effective are the Covid 19 Vaccines, that MDs must be lying to satisfy their hospital’s policies of only using treatments the pharmaceutical corrupted health authorities like the CDC, FDA, and NIH dictate.

However, the following quotes promote the ignorance line of reasoning, as these MDs apparently have no idea the vaccines are not effective.

National File has obtained a recording of a Zoom video conference call between physicians and a marketing director at Novant Heath New Hanover Regional Medical Center, a group of 20 hospitals, clinics, and offices that treat patients in North Carolina and South Carolina.

In the recording, Mary Rudyk, MD tells Director of Marketing Carolyn Fisher and another hospital employee that she wants the hospitals to become more “scary to the public” by inflating the number of COVID-19 patients, and by using messaging that falsely tells individuals “If you don’t get vaccinated, you know you’re going to die.” – National File 

I cover in the article What Who is Dying from Covid Tells Us, which has been illuminated by many others, that the risks of dying from covid are extremely low. And for the population that is not obese or aged, it is certainly not worth being vaccinated. Therefore, the idea of telling people they will die and that they should be vaccinated (particularly when the vaccine does not work) is entirely irresponsible. It further indicates that this hospital does not have access to anyone with analytical skills.

Alternatively, it could suggest that the financial incentives to promote vaccination are such that they know this claim is false, but they are making it anyway.

Conclusion

  • MDs and the overall medical system have significantly degraded or ruined their credibility.
  • They hid effective treatments and gave people ineffective treatments. Pharmaceutical interests puppeteer the medical system, and its information is unreliable.
  • This brings up the question of how many other areas of medicine the medical establishment is providing terrible information on.

Be Notified When Our Upcoming Subscription Website on Ivermectin and Other Medical Treatments is Ready

Ivermectin has many treatment applications outside of its approved use (as an antiparasitical. These treatments include cancer, covid, immunity, and more. And due to perverse financial incentives, many of these applications are hidden from the public.

Due to the many questions we receive on Ivermectin, we are now working on a subscription website that covers everything related to Ivermectin ranging from its many health improvement applications to dosages, and contrasting this with the false information presented on Ivermectin by medical authorities. The site will be ready soon as we are making good progress. We will also be adding questions from subscribers answered as customized articles. 

If you are potentially interested in subscribing, contact us using the text chat widget in the lower right-hand corner of this page and just tell us you are interested in being informed when the website is live.