How Democrats and Liberals Support Social Services Fraud
Executive Summary
- Democrats show that they support social services fraud.

Introduction
Here is the image Gavin Newsom shared of Nick Shirley after he exposed child care fraud in both Minnesota and California.

Democrats are trying to either stigmatize those who find this fraud or say it’s not happening. The vast majority of Democrats do not agree with you that the fraud should be stamped out.
This reaction from Democrats is further making me think these social programs have very nefarious intentions.
When confronted by fraud, Democrats spend their time covering it up and talking about what a bad person Trump is or Nick Shirley is. CNN has either ignored this or critiqued Nick Shirley.
Here is their attempt to undermine Nick Shirley.
CNN’s Undermining of Nick Shirley
CNN states it is “looking into claims of fraud.” This video is from 2 months ago; they never rendered a conclusion.
There is no way of looking at this CNN video except through denialism. They obviously do not want day care fraud exposed.
CNN is the media outlet of the DNC, and they may as well be considered controlled by the DNC. This video is telling you exactly what the DNC thinks of child care fraud by Somalis. They support it.
USAID was funding all sorts of white replacement programs 100% directed by the DNC. That is why Trump gutted USAID. USAID was also being used to reinforce Democratic power.
Racism Against Somalians?
Notice that CBS presents Somalians as victims. Democrats will use race and accusations of racism to defend against investigating and prosecuting fraud. Even though a massive concentration of fraud in recent immigrant communities is obvious, Democrats propose that this has nothing to do with non-whites and non-white immigration.
Ridiculous Statistics on Somalian Social Services Fraud
Liberals demand that no one objectively analyze the fraud of Somalians or any recent immigrant group, and how much they are functioning as parasites on the broader tax base. As long as the immigrant is not white, they are judged as universally positive, and even if they are criminals, liberals still promote non-whites over whites. At this point, liberalism’s primary objective appears to be to promote all non-whites over whites, and that includes non-white illegal alien criminals over any other white in the US.
See this quote on the percentage of Somalis on welfare after being in the US for 10 years.
Comment #1: Staying on Welfare?
3:28 That third statistic was the most damning.
I could understand an immigrant family being on food stamps, Medicare, and welfare for a few years after immigrating. You have limited grasp of the language, how the country functions, your capacity to gain meaningful employment is limited.
It has to be incredibly hard to uproot your life, and it takes time.
But after 10 years, the over all average only fell from 81% to 78%? That to me shows comfort with a status quo at the expense of your neighbors rather than a willingness to contribute and build something alongside them.
Comment #2: Being Crafty?
I am East African (not Somali) and it is part of the culture to take advantage of an opportunity like free welfare/money – the american notion of it being shameful and embarrassing to be on welfare doesn’t exist – it’s seen as being “crafty” and “resourceful”
Comment #3: Everyone Has the Same Culture as Liberals Say They Do?
This is the interesting angle to me, how different cultures have different values. But we are not allowed to discuss it with liberal people who want to believe that the whole world shares western values.
Comment #4: Zero Correlation to the US?
i spent 18 months in the somali/ eritrea/djibouti region in the early 90’s. it was like beng on mars. there is zero corelation between their culture and ours. child brides, incest, rape and murder are the norm there. the miserable economy, lack of water aand centuries of conflict has truly turned the region feral. if ever in the history of humanity there was an area that needed to be walled off until the smoke clears, it is this region.
But again, according to Democrats, by virtue of being non-white, Somalians are more deserving of American social programs than non-Somalians, and particularly white.
Gaslighting
It’s interesting that none of the Democrats who questioned ever seem to know how bad the Somali statistics are versus non-Somalis; however, at the same time, Democrats make blanket statements that Somalians are a net benefit to US society — which is contradicted by the statistics that they say they cannot recollect.
Dr. Oz is a Racist and Hates Armenians?
Dr. Oz used to have a television show, but is currently responsible for administering Medicare and Medicaid within DHHS.
But according to Gavin Newsom, pointing out fraud is “targeting Armenian Americans.”
Any person pointing out fraud in these programs is, according to Liberals and asshole, a racist, and in the case of Nick Shirley, a pedophile.
The Motive to Expose Fraud is Actually Pedophilia, Racism, and Necrophilia?
What else could explain Nick Shirley’s obsession with child care centers other than pedophilia? Now that he is exposing hospice centers, he is also probably motivated by necrophilia.
Both the Armenian community in Van Nuys and the CA government and Liberals are now calling Dr. Oz a racist.
Also, he is stigmatizing hospice care (by focusing on empty hospice centers).
The implication is clear — the head of Medicare and Medicaid has no right to point out Medicare and Medicaid fraud — IF the fraud is being conducted by non-whites. I think the Democrats may allow M&M fraud if the perpetrator is white.
Conclusion
In every case, Democrats show they support social services fraud. Democrats are dedicated to using social programs to replace whites in white countries, an white liberals also support this and tell you that white replacement is a good thing.