How Democrats and Liberals Support Social Services Fraud

Table of Contents: Select a Link to be Taken to That Section

Executive Summary

Democrats show that they support social services fraud.

Introduction

Here is the image Gavin Newsom shared of Nick Shirley after he exposed child care fraud in both Minnesota and California.

Democrats are trying to either stigmatize those who find this fraud or say it’s not happening. The vast majority of Democrats do not agree with you that the fraud should be stamped out.

This reaction from Democrats is further making me think these social programs have very nefarious intentions.

When confronted by fraud, Democrats spend their time covering it up and talking about what a bad person Trump is or Nick Shirley is. CNN has either ignored this or critiqued Nick Shirley.

Here is their attempt to undermine Nick Shirley.

CNN’s Undermining of Nick Shirley

CNN states it is “looking into claims of fraud.” This video is from 2 months ago; they never rendered a conclusion.

There is no way of looking at this CNN video except through denialism. They obviously do not want day care fraud exposed.

CNN is the media outlet of the DNC, and they may as well be considered controlled by the DNC. This video is telling you exactly what the DNC thinks of child care fraud by Somalis. They support it.

USAID was funding all sorts of white replacement programs 100% directed by the DNC. That is why Trump gutted USAID. USAID was also being used to reinforce Democratic power.

Racism Against Somalians?

Notice that CBS presents Somalians as victims. Democrats will use race and accusations of racism to defend against investigating and prosecuting fraud. Even though a massive concentration of fraud in recent immigrant communities is obvious, Democrats propose that this has nothing to do with non-whites and non-white immigration.

Ridiculous Statistics on Somalian Social Services Fraud

Liberals demand that no one objectively analyze the fraud of Somalians or any recent immigrant group, and how much they are functioning as parasites on the broader tax base. As long as the immigrant is not white, they are judged as universally positive, and even if they are criminals, liberals still promote non-whites over whites. At this point, liberalism’s primary objective appears to be to promote all non-whites over whites, and that includes non-white illegal alien criminals over any other white in the US.

See this quote on the percentage of Somalis on welfare after being in the US for 10 years.

Comment #1: Staying on Welfare?

3:28 That third statistic was the most damning.

I could understand an immigrant family being on food stamps, Medicare, and welfare for a few years after immigrating. You have limited grasp of the language, how the country functions, your capacity to gain meaningful employment is limited.

It has to be incredibly hard to uproot your life, and it takes time.

But after 10 years, the over all average only fell from 81% to 78%? That to me shows comfort with a status quo at the expense of your neighbors rather than a willingness to contribute and build something alongside them.

Comment #2: Being Crafty?

I am East African (not Somali) and it is part of the culture to take advantage of an opportunity like free welfare/money – the american notion of it being shameful and embarrassing to be on welfare doesn’t exist – it’s seen as being “crafty” and “resourceful”

Comment #3: Everyone Has the Same Culture as Liberals Say They Do?

This is the interesting angle to me, how different cultures have different values. But we are not allowed to discuss it with liberal people who want to believe that the whole world shares western values.

Comment #4: Zero Correlation to the US?

i spent 18 months in the somali/ eritrea/djibouti region in the early 90’s. it was like beng on mars. there is zero corelation between their culture and ours. child brides, incest, rape and murder are the norm there. the miserable economy, lack of water aand centuries of conflict has truly turned the region feral. if ever in the history of humanity there was an area that needed to be walled off until the smoke clears, it is this region.

But again, according to Democrats, by virtue of being non-white, Somalians are more deserving of American social programs than non-Somalians, and particularly white.

Gaslighting

It’s interesting that none of the Democrats who questioned ever seem to know how bad the Somali statistics are versus non-Somalis; however, at the same time, Democrats make blanket statements that Somalians are a net benefit to US society — which is contradicted by the statistics that they say they cannot recollect.

Dr. Oz is a Racist and Hates Armenians?

Dr. Oz used to have a television show, but is currently responsible for administering Medicare and Medicaid within DHHS.

But according to Gavin Newsom, pointing out fraud is “targeting Armenian Americans.”

Any person pointing out fraud in these programs is, according to Liberals and asshole, a racist, and in the case of Nick Shirley, a pedophile.

The Motive to Expose Fraud is Actually Pedophilia, Racism, and Necrophilia?

What else could explain Nick Shirley’s obsession with child care centers other than pedophilia? Now that he is exposing hospice centers, he is also probably motivated by necrophilia.

Both the Armenian community in Van Nuys and the CA government and Liberals are now calling Dr. Oz a racist.

Also, he is stigmatizing hospice care (by focusing on empty hospice centers).

The implication is clear — the head of Medicare and Medicaid has no right to point out Medicare and Medicaid fraud — IF the fraud is being conducted by non-whites. I think the Democrats may allow M&M fraud if the perpetrator is white.

Denmark’s Statistics Demonstrate the People White Countries are Bringing in are Massive Drains on White Societies

This quote is from the article by the excellent analyst and author at Celine’s Substack — State Financed Rape.

Migrants from Somalia demonstrate a staggering rape conviction rate roughly 20 times higher than that of the native Danish population, while simultaneously costing the Danish taxpayer approximately $20,000 per individual, per year. The Somali diaspora in Denmark, largely arriving as refugees since the 1990s, has persistently registered some of the lowest employment rates and highest levels of welfare dependency of any demographic group. The financial burden is compounded by severe integration failures that manifest in high rates of severe criminality.

Similarly, populations arriving from the Middle East, specifically Syria and Palestine, exhibit conviction rates 15 to 18 times higher than the native baseline, carrying corresponding annual net fiscal burdens of $15,000 to $18,000 per capita.

The Syrian cohort, largely a product of the 2015 migration crisis, represents a massive contemporary fiscal drain. Recent Ministry of Finance data highlighted that individuals with origins in Syria account for a highly disproportionate share of the total net expenditure on immigrants, costing the state billions of kroner annually despite widespread public assumptions that their integration was proceeding smoothly.

The Ministry of Finance has explicitly reported that immigrants and their descendants from non-Western countries cost the state tens of billions of kroner annually. In a landmark 2021 report analysing data from 2018, the Ministry revealed that non-Western immigrants and descendants resulted in a net cost of 31 billion DKK to the public finances.

The Incompatibility of Mass Immigration With a High-Trust Society

It was during this chaotic period that the Danish public and, crucially, the social democratic political class, recognised that the survival of their high-trust welfare model was fundamentally incompatible with open-ended, mass immigration from the third world. The generosity of the Danish welfare state inadvertently functions as a powerful, global magnet for migration and a paralysing trap for long-term dependency.

However, for a low-skilled migrant, the economic differential between engaging in full-time, minimum-wage employment and maximising welfare dependency is often entirely negligible. Conservative think tanks in Denmark, such as the Centre for Political Studies (CEPOS), have long argued that the fundamental structure of public benefits directly disincentivises work for immigrants.

When the host state provides a standard of living that far exceeds the average median income of a migrant’s home country, without the absolute, existential necessity of employment, the motivation to engage in the arduous, multi-year process of language acquisition and skills training evaporates.

So many countries are importing permanent welfare recipients.

The main motivation of the leadership in white countries is to hide the costs and crimes of immigrants. This is explained in the following quotation.

A revealing study conducted by researchers at Aalborg University tested the knowledge of the Danish public regarding how well non-Western immigrants and their descendants perform in areas such as crime, employment, and education.

The findings were staggering, the Danish public is utterly out of touch with reality, consistently and drastically underestimating the severity of the integration failure. For example, respondents perceived the crime rate of young non-Western immigrants to be far lower than it actually is, and estimated employment rates and support for gender equality to be significantly higher than the empirical data dictates.

Comment #1: The Fake Claims of Required Imported Labor

This is a highly insightful comment on Celine’s article.

In the US we’ve had the whole “We need the undocumented migrants to pick the crops” thing going on for decades.

Don’t ever let them tell you this type on nonsense.

I took to explaining the American Women’s Land Army to these people.

The AWLA was an organization created during the Second World War to make up for manpower availability problems due to war.

The AWLA was inspired by the British WLA, to be clear.

At the same time that America expanded its industrial output x11 and sent 16,000,000 men into the military, American women were mobilized, on a voluntary basis, to make up the difference.

The program was aimed primarily at young unmarried women 18+ who could work harvests all over the country.

And the harvests weren’t just feeding the US and its entire 16million man military, it fed our allies, their armies, liberated countries, and occupied countries.

And we had state and county programs that acted in the same way, often as fire brigades when a crop was in danger of being wasted in the field.

All while the border was sealed and controlled by active duty army units.

There is no argument for importing workers unless the economy is growing by leaps and bounds. No economy in the West has grown like this for decades.

What the West is experiencing is the last, angry, desperate gasp of a failed managerial class. They are flailing.

In the most benign interpretation, they are trying to stimulate GDP growth (which only goes to the investor class today)by lowering the standard of living for everyone but the top 10%. Then they can point at GDP growth as their excellent management at work.

But, looking at places like the UK, it really seems like they are just attempting to crush any chance of reform.

Comment #2: How Islam Works

One of the basic tenants of Islam is to spread the faith to all four comers of the world. This is hammered into Muslims from cradle to grave. When they immigrate, it is not with the intention of adopting the legal and cultural standards of the new host country, but solely to bring Islam, along with its own Sharia legal system and culture to its host, as a seed to change the laws and culture of the host itself. Under Islam teaching, this is not optional, but required behavior. In addition, they intentionally Burden their new host economically, as their underlying goal is to weaken the host to better facilitate its demise, and their ultimate dominance and takeover. In Islam, there is no room for live and let live. Any non Islamic culture is an enemy to be destroyed.

Comment #3: President Johnson’s “Great Society”

Important research. But certainly since President Johnson’s welfare program aimed at non-whites — “Great Society” — passed in the 1960s — “We’ll have those NoN-whites voting Democrat for the next 100 years” — the whole world has easily been able to look at America and see that giving free money to browns and blacks causes an explosion in brown/black crime; no need to work to put food in your mouth, so now they use that freed-up time to rob, rape, and murder. On a full belly.

So this has been visible in the U.S. for a half-century now … … and … … still the Europeans implemented the Exact. Same. Thing. Which is what the important factual presentation above shows.

The only sane, non-mentally ill conclusion to be drawn is … … ensuring that browns and blacks have, for free, full bellies and lots of physical energy and spare time (because: no need to work, to be able to eat) … plenty of energy and time to maim, murder, and rape … … absolutely is a feature, not a bug, for our “leaders”. No accident, no mistake, no “oops!”. A desired feature. Seeing it play out over 50, 60 years in the U.S. and then COPYING the model … … that is no coincidence or accident.

White Replacement

The end goal of mass immigration is clearly white replacement.

Conclusion

In every case, Democrats show they support social services fraud. Democrats are dedicated to using social programs to replace whites in white countries, and white liberals also support this and tell you that white replacement is a good thing.