How Jewish Private Equity Ownership Ruined Las Vegas

Jewish Financial Control Cannot be Questioned?

It’s very important that Jews control the media because they need to run a cover story as to why what Jews do cannot be critiqued and is some type of racism. An example of this is found in the article Finance Codeword for Jew.

The idea that there’s something wrong—and Jewish—about finance has a long, ugly history that’s been making a comeback and distracting from necessary reforms of the financial industry.

Warren has devoted her career to fighting the disastrous regime of deregulation, tax cuts, and upward wealth redistribution that began in the 1980s, a background that makes her seem like an ideal candidate to fix the systemic issues in our economy that have caused the collapse of the middle class. Yet, one line in her article gave me pause:

“But far too often, the private equity firms are like vampires—bleeding the company dry and walking away enriched even as the company succumbs.”

Here, even Warren supporters such as myself should pause at what comes dangerously close to a sinister, conspiratorial trope. Language that compares bankers to parasites has long been a staple of anti-Semitic scapegoating and a way for demagogues to rile up their base.

Warren and others on the left should be applauded for their necessary critiques of the financial industry and bringing attention to dangerous policies like the deregulation of risky investment vehicles.

Well, the problem is that a huge percentage of the extractive financial industry, not only in the United States but internationally, is Jewish. If Elizabeth Warren were trying to be accurate rather than just politically correct and protecting her funding base, she would point out, actively, that Jews are a major problem in extractive finance.

But it’s necessary to step back and examine the roots of the left’s contempt for finance when that contempt extends beyond the specifics of policy and to the nature of the financial industry itself.

It’s difficult to see how this is true at all, and every example provided of financial entities that abuse their power and act as parasites is quite accurate. So why would anyone have to step back to point out exploitation and the abuse of power, because a high percentage of the people who are involved in this are Jewish, doesn’t really make any sense, unless, of course, you’re Jewish and you’re trying to protect people from getting this information.

The idea that finance is “vampiric,” that it feeds off of the honest productivity of hard workers to extract unmerited earnings, is a sentiment that has direct roots in a long history of anti-Semitism.

The reason for this long history of Jews being vampiric is that historically, Jews have been vampiric. Calling this anti-Semitic doesn’t change what the facts of the matter are. Of course, in order to continue to act in a vampiric fashion, one cannot have their victims know that they’re going to do this. So essentially, these types of articles have to say that the entire history of Jews being vampiric needs to be covered up so that the Jews can continue to act in a vampiric fashion. The financialization of the US economy has continued to increase, and this has happened as Jews have become more powerful in the US than ever. The rise of Jewish wealth has been the highest in US history. All of this wealth has not come from simply adding value to the economy.

The greater issue facing the U.S. is not anything intrinsic to the nature of finance, but the overfinancialization of our economy—the rampant deregulation of financial products coupled with the primacy our businesses give to shareholders and incentives to do so that Congress has written into our tax code for the past several decades. But as a Jew, I am aware of the dangers in conflating a call for structural reforms of our government and economy with the moral demonization of the financial industry’s intrinsic nature.

Yes, well, Jews were instrumental in changing the regulation so that this would occur. It is simply impossible to make the claim that this was not either led by Jews or highly influenced by Jews.

Conclusion

The downfall of Las Vegas is completely predictable because the way that these modern casinos are managed is an absolute prototype of how Jews manage businesses. There has been historical criticism, and shame foisted onto Las Vegas because for a portion of its history, a number of its casinos were mob-controlled and or partially mob-owned. However, these disreputable mobsters managed their casinos in a much more ethical fashion than the modern-day Jewish private equity executives.

We have a clear before and after here, which is a Las Vegas that had no Jewish ownership or very low Jewish ownership of casinos on the Strip, and then the modern era, where we have a very high percentage of the casinos on the Strip that are owned by Jews. And the outcome under mob-run rules has been far superior and far more ethical than when Jewish private equity firms have run these casinos. However, while it’s considered totally acceptable to critique the era of mob-run casinos as being corrupt, it is completely censored to make any critique of the modern Jewish/private equity-run casinos.

This article is not an endorsement of organized crime. I oppose organized crime — but when our modern legalized entities like private equity cannot outperform the mob in either outcomes or restricting greed, what does that say about our respectability and effectiveness of modern entities? If private equity can’t outperform the mob, then why is the mob illegal and stamped out, while private equity is legal and promoted?

Here is a different view on the topic.