How Non Whites Take Over White Run Societies With Demographics

Executive Summary

• This article examines the problematic historical pattern of non-whites taking over white societies.

Introduction

This article shows a repeating historical pattern of how non-whites takeover white white societies with demographics.

Lessons from the Ivory Coast: The Decline of Africa After Independence

• Every country in Africa has experienced decline since gaining independence. And this decline appears to be permanent.
• The further African countries are from exposure to Europeans, the worse their outcomes tend to be.

The Decline of Rhodesia/Zimbabwe

This video describes the extreme mismanagement of Rhodesia by black management. 

The Story of Rhodesia / Zimbabwe

Rhodesians made the same mistake that South Africans did, but before them. This video explains how the white Rhodesians bought the lie that the black government would treat them fairly and succumbed to international pressure to allow for blacks to vote, which of course would result in the black government, which of course would result in them ending up being treated unfairly and not being able to live in the country.

International Pressure on Rhodesia

Through international pressure, Rhodesia was pushed into the worst possible outcome, which is black voting, which leads to black rule. 

That is where, in South Africa, the Zimbabweans planned to take control over things that whites brought and created—at the same time, getting rid of the whites.

White people need to realize that this is the way that it’s always going to work. Any area that ends up with the other race is taken over by political control. It’s the same thing as a white person simply having to leave that area eventually. The only difference is that it doesn’t happen immediately when the political control is taken, because there is a honeymoon phase, and in the early stages, promises are made to get along and follow the law. But eventually it always happens. South Africa didn’t seem to learn anything from what happened in Zimbabwe.

Blacks’ and White Liberals’ Fake History on Rhodesia

It was whites that made Rhodesia a desirable country, and blacks that made it a country no one wants to live in, and produced enduring emigration. When whites ran for Rhodesia, they received a large amount of immigration (which also allowed blacks to take political control over Rhodesia). After blacks took over Rhodesia, immigration to Rhodesia dropped, and then Rhodesia became a producer of desperate immigration away from Rhodesia.

Where Do Zimbabwean’s Immigrate To

It’s interesting that, of all the countries Zimbabweans could immigrate to after black mismanagement of Zimbabwe, South Africa is one of the only countries in Africa that continues to have white developed infrastructure.

This video shows that the black Zimbabweans shut down schools created by whites, and followed communist ideas, where what the whites created needed to be destroyed. 

The liberal idea of majority rule will never work where those societies are not white.

This video explains that the takeover of Rhodesia by blacks led to the mass emigration of whites from Rhodesia and massive violence between the tribes of Rhodesia. Rhodesia was exceptionally well run under whites, and completely flipped into incompetent rule under blacks. This amazing thing is that this takeover by blacks of what whites created in Rhodesia was only possible because of international pressure from white countries.

• Under white rule, there was no starvation in Rhodesia, and under black rule, there was starvation; however, the international media covered up how this change was due to blacks taking political power.
• Farms taken from whites became far less productive when given to blacks.
• As with South Africanists, the life for blacks in Rhodesia was far better under white rule than under black rule.
• Zimbabwe continues to be a country that is incompetently managed and that produces large numbers of people who want to immigrate from Zimbabwe and oftentimes end up in South Africa. However, there is no media coverage of the failure of the transition from white rule to black rule in Zimbabwe.

More on Rhodesia

The Lessons of Rhodesia and South Africa for The Historically White Countries

This is the problem in the US, Australia, and Europe. Non white groups have taken over white areas with migration and population growth, which eventually leads to political power, which ultimately leads to white flight or whites leaving.

In the case of Rhodesia and South Africa, the blacks did not defeat the whites militarily. What they did was grow their population so that they completely outnumbered whites. I cover this topic in detail in the article The Undiscussed Issue of Overpopulation in South Africa’s Decline.

This graphic is also used in that article.

After political control of the country passed to blacks in the mid-1990s, the black population dramatically increased due to the reduced enforcement of immigration control by the ANC. The whites in South Africa are more outnumbered now than ever, and blacks — after ruining nearly all of South Africa– have their sights set on Cape Town, one of the few nice areas left in South Africa, which the ANC does not run, but the DA does. Blacks are increasing their immigration to Cape Town — which is a precursor to taking political control over Cape Town.

South Africa and Rhodesian blacks took over the societies, which they had no idea how to manage due to their demographics. Other white countries like the UK pressured Rhodesian whites to allow for blacks to vote, which led to terrible outcomes that always occur whenever blacks take political power.

Conclusion

White people should be very concerned about any type of demographic change, which results in a reduction in the percentage of whites in the population, because this always appears to go in one direction, which is eventually the non-white group taking political power over a white system. Whites create the best systems and best countries in the world. So they are magnets for non-white immigrants who want to leave countries that are run by non-whites. However, the problem with that is that this is not something that has a natural limiting factor built into it.