South African Blacks Are Unhappy They Have Not Yet Gotten to Ruin Cape Town

Executive Summary

  • Blacks in South Africa complain about Cape Town being racist and that the ANC does not control Cape Town.
  • This article analyzes the problems with the arguments made by black South Africans.


One can learn a lot from an article in the New York Times about Cape Town titled In a Divided City, Many Blacks See Echoes of White Superiority.

I analyzed the quotes from this article, and it provides an interesting insight into the minds of black South Africans.

The Promise of Post Apartheid South Africa?

The first quote is as follows.

For countless foreign visitors, Cape Town is an indelible symbol of the beauty and promise of post-apartheid South Africa.

But for many black South Africans, this city represents something very different: the last bastion of white rule.

“No matter how famous/rich u r, ur still a 2nd class citizen if ur Black in Cape Town,” Lindiwe Suttle, a singer and performance artist, wrote in a Twitter challenge to Helen Zille, the white leader of the party that governs this city.

The article will discuss this further, but South Africa is predominantly black and predominantly black-run.

What is curious is that rather than discussing the progress, or should one say the lack of progress, in the black-run majority of South Africa, the focus of this article is on one of the only areas that are not black-run.

The “Deindustrialization” of South Africa Exclusively by Blacks

The ANC can’t stop blacks, and it is always blacks, from attacking people on trains and looting infrastructure, which continually shrinks the capabilities of the train network. Soon, the SA rail system will stop functioning entirely. This same degradation of infrastructure and rise in violent crime occurred in countless US cities from Detroit to Baltimore. However, it is presented as “deindustrialization,” which is 100% due to foreign competition, which reduces domestic manufacturing. It is important to both blacks and white liberals that blacks never be held accountable for the decline of a city or country after blacks take over the political management of that item. 

Notice the following quotation.

This is the only major metropolis in South Africa where black people are not the majority, and it remains deeply divided. The particularly harsh legacy of apartheid as it was carried out here has left especially deep scars that still demarcate the geography: whites in the city center and its mountainside inner suburbs, nonwhites in the distant townships on the Cape Flats. Apartheid policies effectively barred blacks from living or even working in the city, giving so-called colored, or mixed-race, people, today the city’s largest ethnic group, priority over blacks for jobs and housing.

The Last Deck Chair on the Titanic?

However, Cape Town, also commonly called the “last deck chair on the Titanic,” receives the vast majority of tourism and is considered one of the only friendly significant cities left in South Africa. Isn’t it curious how the only area that a white political party controls is the only nice part left of South Africa?

What allowed this to happen?

Well, the racist policies against blacks are what protected the city.

If Cape Town were allowed to follow the pathway of the rest of South Africa, it would no longer be nice because there are not nice places in the world that are predominantly black.

That means that they have a black population or even a small black population and certainly under black management. When examining multiple cities and observing when they declined, a white city can tolerate a black population of between 5 and 7%. After that point, the white flight occurs, and the area goes into a swift decline. Liberals call this “5 to 7%” when the city can still function. The black parasitism in white society as the “golden period” is what they use to promote black pride and blacks taking more responsibility, which invariably leads to more blacks and other non-whites infiltrating an area, and then that area going into a swift decline. It is considered unacceptable to notice that the reason the item was successful in the first place was because it was built up by whites.

Liberals have no idea that blacks are incompetent at managing an advanced society or any of the technology and systems that support an advanced society.

As the Black Percentage of the Population Increases

As the black percentage of the population increases, the condition of the city and the opportunities provided by the city continually decline.

In most black cities in the US, such as Detroit, which is 80% black, the cities go into federal receivership, and the city is unrecognizable as an American city.

In each case, blacks in that city take 100% of the blame for what they did to the city and place the blame on whites. One of the curious accusations is that with whites moving out of the area, the blacks are “racially isolated,” which is a curious argument to make for a race that states it is equal to whites.

I can’t ever recall whites anywhere in the world complaining about another race leaving their area and using this as an excuse for why they could not succeed. The reason for this is simple. Whites do not need other races to create the best societies, but blacks cannot do much of anything without whites, white technology, infrastructure, organizational ability, etc..

Blacks Are Continually Looking to Leave Black Areas for White Areas

Blacks are continually seeking to flee black-run areas for white-run areas.

This same scenario is the case all through the US. In the US, the worst-run cities are all black, and they have black populations that would like to leave (Baltimore, Detroit, East St Louis, etc,) and every time, the desired destination is a white-run area. Black in the US do not migrate to hispanic run cities, they migrate to white run cities.

The List of Worst Run Cities in the US

This is the worst-run city, according to NerdWallet.

All of these cities have both a high percentage of black population and black political leadership. When a black city is taken over by black leadership, it is a kill shot for the city, and it never comes back. There are nice areas in, say, Chicago, but Chicago is an immense city. The nice parts of the broader Chicago metro are always white and white politically controlled. One city that managed to remain nice with a large black population was Atlanta — however, Atlanta has gone through enormous efforts to isolate blacks from the rest of the population. As blacks ruin any area where they go — the only answer to them being in the vicinity is to engage in apartied. This was called Jim Crow in the South and apartied in South Africa. 

Only One of Nine Providences in South Africa Run by Whites?

This reality is covered in the following quotation.

Beyond history, there is present-day politics. Western Cape is the only one of the country’s nine provinces not run by the governing African National Congress. It is run by Ms. Zille’s Democratic Alliance, which grew out of the white anti-apartheid movement but ultimately came to include remnants of the old National Party that created apartheid. In a speech last year in a black township near Cape Town, South Africa’s president, Jacob Zuma, said the city had an “extremely apartheid system,” according to local newspaper reports on his remarks. The African National Congress is trying to win the province, and the Democratic Alliance has dismissed the assertion that Cape Town is racist as a political ploy. “It is labeled a racist city by the A.N.C. because it is the only metro in the country they don’t control,” said Patricia de Lille, the mayor of Cape Town.

The transition from white rule of South Africa to black rule has been ruinous and has reduced the quality of life for blacks, while the population of the country has increased by 20 million, in large part because the ANC has been incompetent at managing the border, and other black Africans are desperate to leave their black run societies to enter a country that at least has some white residue, even though it is largely run by blacks.

Not Enough Opportunities in Cape Town for Blacks?

But a study completed by researchers at the University of Cape Town in December 2010 found that black residents saw few business opportunities for themselves in Cape Town, and that companies struggled to recruit and retain them. It concluded that in Western Cape, “African people are almost always less successful than white people in moving up career paths, creating an ‘ebony ceiling’ effect.”

Why must blacks search for opportunities to live and work in Cape Town? Remember, the ANC runs nearly the entire country — why would blacks need to travel to Cape Town?

The Black Preference to Not Live in Black Areas

  • This makes it look like blacks are not satisfied with the management of their areas and prefer white-managed areas. If that is true, then why was South Africa ever converted to black rule?
  • When South Africa was converted to black rule, the ANC stated that it would be able to run South Africa far better than the DeKlerk government.
  • When will the ANC and the liberals that supported transitioning South Africa to black rule going to be held responsible for being 100% wrong?

Excluding Blacks from Beaches?

The office is not the only place where blacks feel unwelcome. Many of the more exclusive Atlantic coast beaches, which used to prohibit blacks, still tend to attract almost entirely whites, reinforcing the divide.

What is wrong with the black-run beaches in most of the country? Well, here is the problem with the beaches in Durban, South Africa.

Durban’s Severe Degradation Under Black Management

Durban used to be managed by whites; then the ANC took over. Watch the video to see how Durban has declined and how the untreated sewage has ruined the beaches around Durban. 

Durban did not have these problems when whites managed it. These problems don’t occur in Cape Town, which is still run by whites.

Durban No Longer a Tourist Destination

At 1:20, this YouTuber asks, “Why are the beaches at Cape Town popular, but those in Durban are not.” He then compares the two cities’ beaches, saying that both have lovely natural geography. Is the question really that complicated to figure out the answer to? It is very uncommon for black-run cities to be tourist destinations. If you take the Carribean islands, which is black run, the Carribean is known for cruise ships. The cruise ships allow the tourists to experience the lovely ocean, beaches, and natural beauty of the islands, with minimal interaction with the blacks that live on the islands. Go back to the cruise ship after visiting, say, Martinique, which, thank god, is not run by blacks. 

Everyone in this video tap dances around the obvious topic. However, black and white liberals must pretend it is a big surprise.

Why do blacks need to spend time at beaches that are maintained by whites? Durban has great beaches, but because blacks now run Durban, blacks are not able to maintain their beaches properly, and now they want access to Cape Town’s beaches.

South Africa is Not an Integrated Country?

“I hate going to Camps Bay because everyone there is white,” said Yoliswa Dwane, referring to an upscale seaside suburb on the Atlantic coast that was once reserved for whites.

“You don’t get the perception that this is an integrated country.”

And this gets to the core of the issue.

Blacks don’t want to go to seaside suburbs where blacks run the area; they want to go to white-run areas — and when they face barriers, they make the argument of a lack of “integration.” With “integration” they bring all of their dysfunction to that area.

Blacks “Integrating” Miami Beach

By going to Miami in large numbers, the city is ruined. Those who live in Miami Beach and business hate when blacks descend upon Miami Beach in large numbers. Many beaches are very black, but blacks don’t like going there. 

Integration means that the city or area will be ruined.

However, it would be impossible for whites to stop blacks from creating nice areas in the rest of South Africa — but blacks can’t do it. How is that the fault of white?

The Need to Keep Out Blacks

Some report being told that there are no tables available at an empty restaurant, or no cars at a well-stocked rental car office. Others recount being warned by white neighbors not to slaughter animals for festive occasions, or being mistaken for a prostitute simply for having drinks in a bar full of white patrons.

Anyone who has managed facilities knows that to keep areas nice, you have to keep out blacks. Any area that is not racist will suffer the consequences as it allows groups who want to flee their undesirable areas to seek refuge in white areas.

As soon as an area accepts blacks, the blacks tear down that area. The only time this “works” is when the black percentage of the population is very low. In Detroit, companies began moving out of areas in the 1940s when blacks had moved to when the percentage hit around 5%. When the black population becomes sufficiently large, whites and other groups flee that area. Then blacks take over the political management of that city, which leads to the end of the city being not only a desirable place to live but even a desirable place to visit, and anyone avoids it unless they have to travel there.

Blacks Need to Belong?

“When I say I am from Cape Town, the response is always, ‘No black person is from Cape Town,’ ” Mr. Mamputa said. “African people add to the discrimination in the sense that they see themselves as outsiders. They are creating that sense that we don’t belong here.”

Well, blacks don’t belong in areas created and maintained by whites. Why did anyone ever think that they did? There are no whites or Asians or anyone else trying to enter areas created and maintained by blacks. Whites can create areas that all of the other races want to infiltrate — and that includes blacks.

Cape Town is Racist?

Like many young black people, Ms. Khanyile would not consider remaining in Cape Town to pursue a career in business.

“Cape Town is racist,” she said. “Everybody knows that.”

This quote contains a lot of information. If blacks can’t infiltrate and eventually ruin a white area, then that is called racism. However, if the area is infiltrated and ruined, like the rest of South Africa or any black city in the US, then the city becomes hopeless, and the blacks seek to leave that city for white-run cities.

Guns — Not Blacks Are the Problem?

At that point, several excuses were created that were careful never to have any blame directed at blacks. So, in Baltimore, which used to be a very prosperous city built by whites, it is now “guns” that are driving blacks out. Who or what race is using these guns is conveniently ignored. As is the fact that other areas have much higher gun ownership than Baltimore, and guns are not a problem.

Baltimore is also known as rat-infested, which again is not blamed on black management. However, Baltimore may be ruined; it may be on US Federal assistance, but because it is primarily black, it can never be called “racist.”

The Dominance of Blacks in the Violence Statistics in the US

Why Other Races Flee Black Areas

Whites and other races flee from blacks for very good reasons. In the US blacks are the number one racial group that victimizes other racial groups with violent crime. Black culture is harmful to both blacks and anyone else who is around blacks. Blacks themselves know this. However, they don't usually admit it to other races and prefer to blame everything else but themselves. For blacks to effectively race scam -- they have to hold the position that blacks behave the same and deserve the same outcomes as other races. 

All Races Are the Same?

This is a part of the root of the problem. This proposal that all races are the same had no evidence to support it, yet it was asserted because it was politically correct. It was an appealing lie to believe because it "felt good."

Once this idea took hold, it now became a platform to say that all races should have the same things, and this has primarily been interpreted as non-whites invading white spaces and countries and taking their society from them.

Blacks want white outcomes, but because they can't produce white outcomes on their own, they have to invade white societies to obtain them, and their tool is not producing these things themselves but by taking them through living in white-originated societies.

The Repeating Pattern Seen Everywhere Blacks Exist

When blacks move into a neighborhood, that area becomes undesirable. Shoplifting increases, violence increases, and sexual assault increases. This leads to stores closing and a downward spiral for that area. The higher the percentage of the population that is black, the more predominant this and many other negative behaviors become as they begin to behave in conformance with black culture and expectations rather than conforming. 

What Would Happen if the US Had No Blacks?

Blacks are a massive civilization threat to any country, society, or city that accepts them. All countries, except white countries, have figured out not to have blacks live in their borders. 

Here is some food for thought: “What if all the Blacks suddenly left America, which is 13.3% of the total U.S. population?” and these statistics would improve. 

  • Amount of people in poverty would drop - 34%
  • The prison population would go down - - 37%
  • Welfare recipients would go down by - - - 42%
  • Gang members would go down by - - - - - 53%
  • Chlamydia cases would go down by - - - - - 54%
  • Homelessness would go down - - - - - - - - 57%
  • Syphilis would go down - - - - - - - - - - - - 58%
  • AIDs & HIV would go down - - - - - - - - - - 65%
  • Gonorrhea would go down - - - - - - - - - - 69%
  • Average ACT scores would go up - - - - - - 5.5 points
  • Average IQ would go up - - - - - - - - - - - - 7.4 points, (this is how much only 13% of the population in drags down IQ scores) This would put the U.S. 3rd in the world tied with Japan
  • Average SAT scores would go up almost - - - 100 points
  • The average income for Americans would go up over $20,000 a year

Blacks are major users of subsidies from the rest of the taxpaying population. This burden (some of which used to help blacks reproduce more blacks) would be lifted from the rest of the population

The effect on cities would be profound. All of the predominantly black cities from Detroit to East St Louis to Baltimore to Atlantic City, Wilmington Deleware -- every city would experience an immediate and radical improvement. 

Blacks as a Civilizational Threat

Blacks are a civilizational threat to any area, any city, and they seek to infiltrate white cities and countries because they have no ability to create functional societies, as I cover in the article What Happens When Blacks Take Over Management of Cities and Countries from Whites? Therefore, blacks need to infiltrate a society or city that is already built up by another group -- with the inevitable outcome that the area is ruined when a sufficient number of blacks are present.


What this means is that “racist cities” are nice.

No one in South Africa can deny that Cape Town is the best city in all of South Africa and the whitest area in all of South Africa. Does anyone think that is a coincidence? Since Cape Town is so lovely compared to the more black and black-run cities in South Africa, is this not an affirmation of White Supremacy? Isn’t the fact that so many South African blacks want to move from black or ANC-run areas in South Africa to Cape Town another affirmation of White Supremacy?

The New York Times article never once brought up this fact — or how the rest of South Africa has fallen into third-world nation status under black rule. South Africa had one thing going for it, one thing that separated it from other African countries — and that was that whites managed it.

Blacks and white liberals cannot tolerate the fact that blacks cannot run anything. No matter how many cities are ruined by black management, no one in the US is allowed to say what blacks have done to these cities. Blacks are a civilizational threat to any area, any city, and they seek to infiltrate white cities and countries because they have no ability to create functional societies, as I cover in the article What Happens When Blacks Take Over Management of Cities and Countries from Whites? Therefore, blacks need to infiltrate a society or city that is already built up by another group — with the inevitable outcome that the area is ruined when a sufficient number of blacks are present.