What Happens When Blacks Take Over Management of Cities and Countries from Whites?
Executive Summary
- What happens when blacks take over management from whites is generally undiscussed.
- The outcome is critical to understanding how blacks manage.
Introduction
Non-whites have a habit of trying to place any societal issue onto whites. One example of this is claiming that whites defined all the problems of colorism.
Our References for This Article
See this link if you want to see our references for this article and other related Brightwork articles at this link.
The Steep Decline of All Previously White Created and Managed Cities in the US Due to Black Migration and Black Political Management
The article The Role of Blacks in The Decline of The US Midwest and Manufacturing the large number of previously white cities that have all been degraded by black migration and black political management. Also see the article How Blacks Directly Led to The Decline of Gary Indiana.
There’s not a single US city that has been maintained in its state when it was white and managed by whites after blacks migrated and then took over the city’s political apparatus.
Suppose one looks at the development of African countries both historically and today. In that case, it should not be surprising that it has turned out to be impossible for blacks in the U.S. to maintain the white cities that they took over. In both the case of American cities taken over by blacks and also black countries that obtained their independence from European colonial powers, there were enormous promises of how blacks would be able to succeed in managing their affairs.
The Examples of the Twin Declines of South Africa and Zimbabwe Under Black Management After Being Run Successfully by Whites
Zimbabwe and South Africa. In both cases, the countries quickly went downhill after blacks took over the political system from Europeans.
The main difference is that Zimbabwe underwent the process several decades earlier than South Africa. South African universities have lost their freedom of speech, as they have to conform to the ANC. And a South African degree is significantly reduced in value — so many people have graduated based on their race.
South Africa is rapidly becoming a third-world nation, a trend I explore in the article How South Africa’s Decline Mirrors the Decline of Eskom.
Still Recovering from Apartheid?
It has been explained to me that South Africa is..
“Recovering from the legacy of apartied.”
These people who say this have their timelines mixed up. How could whites have caused that decline if this decline began when blacks took over the political apparatus of these two countries? How can a country be “recovering from the legacy of apartheid” when conditions have worsened since apartheid?
Even among black South Africans, the constant excuse used by the ANC that they are recovering from apartheid is wearing thin.
South African Blacks Were Not Better Under Apartheid?
Notice the pushback that Alan Dershowitz gets from declaring that South Africa is a failed country under the ANC. And he is asked, he can’t possibly mean that the lives of blacks were better under apartheid. However, the lives of blacks were better under apartheid because the lives of blacks are always better under a system where whites are managing the country or the city. If that were not true, you wouldn’t see Blacks move away from countries and cities that blacks manage. Blacks from other South African countries are still illegally immigrating into South Africa to try to parasitize the systems that were put in place by whites. Why are all of these black Africans choosing South Africa to immigrate to over other countries illegally — a country which has more white infrastructure left over than do the countries they live in?
One of the largest producers of illegal aliens is Zimbabwe, which has been ruined by even more decades of black management than South Africa has, causing Zimbabweans to want to leave the country to immigrate to South Africa.
Curiously, the baseline assumption is that blacks can manage a country and a city better than whites. When has that ever been proven to be true?
Liberals Wrong Again and Never Admitting It?
That’s how both blacks and liberals don’t want to talk about the massive decline that has occurred in South Africa since the end of apartheid and the takeover of the ANC, after proposing that having blacks vote in elections was critical and that apartheid had to be eliminated. They are not interested in being held accountable for the fact that absolutely everything they said about South Africa and every one of their projections for South Africa’s future ended up being wrong. The liberals were also mistaken about what would happen in Zimbabwe and failed to predict that Zimbabwe would become a failed state after it was handed over to Mugabe and black leadership to run.
Reality is Constantly Covered Up by Establishment Media
The liberal controlled establishment media has been cautious to hide South Africa’s problems, lack of progress, and failure of the ANC from the public after telling people that everything would be much better when blacks got to vote. And blacks were managing the country politically. This is standard liberal behavior.
- They propose a policy.
- The policy is implemented.
- The policy fails.
- They then ignore the outcome of the policy.
Africans Want to Decolonize Science?
This is a very good example of what South Africa has gone through and is still going through. The average IQ of blacks in South Africa is 70. However, while this is a population that still believes in voodoo and black magic (as is shown in the video), it is commonplace for the blacks to think they will be able to manage South Africa better than Europeans — even though there is no example in human history of this ever happening. By a European standard or even an Arab or Southeast Asia standard, there has never been a prosperous black society. If all European technology were removed from South Africa, the country would revert to its state before the Bronze Age.
How can Blacks in Africa seek to decolonize science when they contributed nothing to science? Science is a series of discoveries and processes for learning, which Africans never contributed to. “Decolonizing science” would mean essentially deleting science.
The Reality: The High Water Mark of South Africa Was Under White Management and Under Apartheid
Apartheid was the high-water mark for South African blacks; they lived better under apartheid than they do today.
Even many black South Africans admit this. However, the subject is taboo. Blacks not living in South Africa do not admit this and would accuse any person who makes such a claim of racism.
The ANC is a giant corruption machine, as with all black run organizations from the school boards in black run cities in the US to any black run organization you can think of.
Understanding Apartied
Part of apartheid was to keep black tribes apart, not just keep blacks apart from whites.
South Africa has concluded its time as an advanced country, specifically because blacks do not run it. The only thing that made South Africa “partially developed” was the whites that created the systems in South Africa, which were part of a technology, organizational and societal transfer of intellectual property and general know-how from European technologies. The establishment media refuses to discuss how the control of SA by black Africans led to its immediate decline.
The Failure of Expropriation of White-Owned and Run Farms
As with the failure of moving South Africa to a black-run country, the process of expropriating white-run farms to blacks has converted South Africa into a net food importer.
No matter how many times a white run farm is transferred to blacks who are politically connected in that country, politicians continue to promote the idea to gain votes from their populace.
A Systemwide Degradation of The Capacity of a Society
Why did South Africa’s power and water systems go into steep decline, systems that were invented by whites, when they were put under black management?
Since blacks have taken over Eskom management from whites, corruption has exploded, and capacity has declined. This occurs in every place where blacks run any entity. The entire state of Eskom is leveraging technologies that were invented by whites. “Decolonizing” the power system and power grid would mean not power system and no power grid. Prior to the arrival of whites in South Africa, creating a campfire was the extent of the knowledge level of energy in not only the region that was South Africa, but in all of Africa.
It should also be noted that Eskom was considered a model power utility internationally before the ANC took it over. Now, Eskom is considered a joke. And this is due to black management of something that was created by whites.
Shocking Details on the Corruption in Eskom
This video explains the massive corruption at Eskom. Black Eskom employees who are on the take have procured rock that has been painted or dyed black rather than coal for the coal-fired Eskom power plants. This ruins the plant. Therefore, not only has Eskom not added any new power plants since the ANC took over, but they have also significantly reduced the capacity of the existing power plants. Eskom cannot either add capacity or manage the existing capacity because Eskom is black-run. It is not possible to have an entity run at anywhere near what are white standards when the entity is black run.
Black Management Continually Leads to Higher Demand and Lower Supply
So, while the supply side declined, the demand side of the equation significantly increased as the black population increased by 20 million since the late 1990s (much of it due to uncontrolled immigration). Observe how the lack of border enforcement has increased desperation in South Africa, which I cover in the article The Undiscussed Issue of Overpopulation in South Africa’s Decline.
No people who believed they had to push South Africa to be taken over by the ANC will admit they were wrong. Instead, they spend all their time talking about the legacy of colonization. For those that proposed the black takeover of South Africa, where was the example of successful management of black countries or cities anywhere?
The Doom Loop of Black Run Entities and Societies
South Africa is experiencing the doom loop that Zimbabwe went through several decades earlier. They can’t say they were wrong. Look at Eskom. They are so corrupt that they have not brought a single new power plant online since the ANC took power. They are just living off of Eskom’s efforts under the previous management. That means the majority black population in South Africa is entirely living off of the accomplishments of the last white-run regime. Creating a black-run society means a dramatically higher population with no new energy capacity and a degraded and lack of maintenance of the power generating capacity built when whites ran the country. The ANC took the one country that you could visit in Sub-Saharan Africa and ruined it.
Some of the most prosperous European countries, like Norway or Sweden, had barely any colonies. How did they become wealthy and organized if they stole their wealth from Africa?
There has been an enormous technological transfer from white societies to non-whites, leaving this out when you perform this analysis. Irrigation, power systems, sanitation, electronics, gasoline, phones — none of these things would exist in Africa, the Middle East, or Latin America without technology transfer from outside. Yet, they are looked at with zero gratitude.
The Worst-Run Cities in the US are Almost Entirely Black Run
See the following list. What do you notice about the list?
This is a list of the worst-run cities (it’s a best-run list that has been sorted in reverse). All of the cities in this list are predominantly black and run by blacks, except for Stockton, CA, which is Mexican and run by Mexicans. San Francisco used to be a well-run city; however, with crazed liberal policies and more blacks in the local government, it has dramatically declined.
These cities used to be well-run, as they were white run. However, as soon as blacks took them over, the towns became corrupt and managed.
Conclusion
When white management is shifted to blacks, the societies go into a steep decline — which worsens the outcomes for the black residents. This happens both in the US and internationally. The main beneficiaries from South Africa being turned over to black management have been those who have benefited from corrupt practices, which is estimated to be around 100 black families connected to the political leadership. Everyone lost.
There is not a single successful black-run city in the US, even though these cities were successful when run by whites. However, this topic is deeply censored. You are not allowed to go on any media platform and state that blacks are incompetent and incapable of running, not only cities or states, but even of running a local school board. This is something that both liberals and blacks demand that they not be critiqued, and that they be told that Blacks are equally capable of running their own systems and organizations. The rapid decline of African countries after they gained independence illustrates that colonialism provided a massive benefit to people living in Africa. And that once that control was removed, their lives were greatly negatively impacted. The number one desire of blacks who live in African countries that have received independence is to move out of a country managed by blacks and immigrate to a country managed by whites.
Every city in the US that has accumulated a substantial black population has seen that city severely decline, with both whites and blacks eventually fleeing the black areas. This is blamed on deindustrialization, however every city where blacks migrate, and particularly if they take over the political apparatus — goes into a serious decline.
The fact that this is so little discussed is amazing. The fact this is so little discussed illustrates how much more people generally are in being politically correct than they are in being accurate.
All of the Areas That Lead the Country in Murders Are Black
This video covers the fact that the majority of the US is quite safe — but has pockets of cities where most of the violent crime occurs. However, the video never brings up the fact that all of these cities are black. In this article (What is the Most Predictive Variable for the US Murder Rate), I cover that over 80% of the rate of violent gun crime can be predicted by one factor, which is the percentage of blacks that live in that area. This article is considered extremely un-PC and, therefore, racist. However, even the most WOKE liberal knows to stay away from black areas. They will verbally state their abhorrence for racism while never driving to black areas and making sure their children go to schools that have a low percentage of blacks. In the US, trying to steer clear of this topic is standard.
For countries previously run by whites, like South Africa and Zimbabwe, these countries went into steep decline after being put under black leadership.