Why Blacks Benefitted Under Jim Crow Laws and Segregation

Executive Summary

  • Jim Crow laws are presented as highly negative.
  • However, the removal of Jim Crow meant blacks running cities, and it unleashed the civilizational threat of blacks onto the general society.


This article covers the reality of the benefits of redlining.

Our References

See our references for this article and related articles at this link.

The False Liberal Claims on Redlining

This video shows the redlining that occurred. PBS presents this as a terrible injustice. This is false in several dimensions. But first, no one working at PBS wants to live in a black-run area, and probably close to zero do. 

The main issue that redlining enforced was to restrict blacks from white areas. However, the question is never asked: if blacks can’t reproduce areas that are anything as civilized as whites, why do they deserve to live in those areas or even visit those areas?

Blacks already receive an enormous subsidy from whites by being allowed to live in a white society. Nearly a billion Africans would love to leave Africa to live in a society run by whites.

Are Blacks Consistent on Redlining?

There is also another reason for this. With the civil rights movement, blacks began to run cities. And, of course, they ran them terribly. Under Jim Crow, blacks have cities run for them by whites, and there is no tolerance for black crime. Under black leadership, blacks are allowed to steal business out of business until they live in a food desert, electronics desert, etc..

The fundamental assumption by liberals is that blacks can manage their affairs effectively — and they can’t.

The Hidden Truth of and Many Benefits of Racial Segregation

How Black Businesses Benefited from Segregation

Segregation gave black businesses a captive market, and black businesses knew how to deal with black customers and shoplifting that whites did not. When blacks view a store as white-owned, a significant percentage of them feel a particular entitlement to steal from that business. 

How Blacks (Along With Latinos) Ruined Atlantic City

The following quote is from Wikipedia.

The racial makeup was 26.65% (10,543) White, 38.29% (15,148) Black or African American, 0.61% (242) Native American, 15.55% (6,153) Asian, 0.05% (18) Pacific Islander, 14.03% (5,549) from other races, and 4.82% (1,905) from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 30.45% (12,044) of the population.

At one point in the distant past, Atlantic City was considered a desirable place to visit. Now, Atlantic City is a slum that has casinos, and unsurprisingly, a high percentage of its population is black.

The motivation for blacks to move to a city is to parasitize what whites have built. however, with the Hispanic population being 30.45 percent of the population and blacks being 38.29 percent, that leaves only 26.65% that is white, and that means a much lower level to parasitize. And with a combined percentage of the population of 70%, people do not want to travel to visit such a location.

The future of Atlantic City is bleak. And now the Mayor of the city is black.

Blacks Always Vote for Blacks

Notice the voting in the presidential election.

In the 2012 presidential election, Democrat Barack Obama received 9,948 votes (86.6% vs. 57.9% countywide), ahead of Republican Mitt Romney with 1,548 votes (13.5% vs. 41.1%) and other candidates with 49 votes (0.4% vs. 0.9%), among the 11,489 ballots cast by the city’s 21,477 registered voters, for a turnout of 53.5% (vs. 65.8% in Atlantic County).

The Low Incomes in Atlantic City

The median income for a household in the city was $26,969, and the median income for a family was $31,997. Males had a median income of $25,471 versus $23,863 for females. The per capita income for the city was $15,402.

As is typically the case, the decline of Atlantic City is never blamed on blacks.

What if Atlantic City Had Been Redlined?

If Atlantic City had been redlined against both blacks and Latinos, Atlantic City would be a desirable place to visit today and would have never gone into its decline. Without redlining, the city has been ruined.

Getting Raped in The Bahamas

These two women from Kentucky stated that the police in the Bahamas did nothing. Yes, that is how policing works in societies that are black-run. Blacks are constantly complaining about the “justice” they receive when living in a white society. However, the justice they would receive in a black-run society would be far worse. 

The Dominance of Blacks in the Violence Statistics in the US

Why Other Races Flee Black Areas

Whites and other races flee from blacks for very good reasons. In the US blacks are the number one racial group that victimizes other racial groups with violent crime. Black culture is harmful to both blacks and anyone else who is around blacks. Blacks themselves know this. However, they don't usually admit it to other races and prefer to blame everything else but themselves. For blacks to effectively race scam -- they have to hold the position that blacks behave the same and deserve the same outcomes as other races. 

All Races Are the Same?

This is a part of the root of the problem. This proposal that all races are the same had no evidence to support it, yet it was asserted because it was politically correct. It was an appealing lie to believe because it "felt good."

Once this idea took hold, it now became a platform to say that all races should have the same things, and this has primarily been interpreted as non-whites invading white spaces and countries and taking their society from them.

Blacks want white outcomes, but because they can't produce white outcomes on their own, they have to invade white societies to obtain them, and their tool is not producing these things themselves but by taking them through living in white-originated societies.

The Repeating Pattern Seen Everywhere Blacks Exist

When blacks move into a neighborhood, that area becomes undesirable. Shoplifting increases, violence increases, and sexual assault increases. This leads to stores closing and a downward spiral for that area. The higher the percentage of the population that is black, the more predominant this and many other negative behaviors become as they begin to behave in conformance with black culture and expectations rather than conforming. 

What Would Happen if the US Had No Blacks?

Blacks are a massive civilization threat to any country, society, or city that accepts them. All countries, except white countries, have figured out not to have blacks live in their borders. 

Here is some food for thought: “What if all the Blacks suddenly left America, which is 13.3% of the total U.S. population?” and these statistics would improve. 

  • Amount of people in poverty would drop - 34%
  • The prison population would go down - - 37%
  • Welfare recipients would go down by - - - 42%
  • Gang members would go down by - - - - - 53%
  • Chlamydia cases would go down by - - - - - 54%
  • Homelessness would go down - - - - - - - - 57%
  • Syphilis would go down - - - - - - - - - - - - 58%
  • AIDs & HIV would go down - - - - - - - - - - 65%
  • Gonorrhea would go down - - - - - - - - - - 69%
  • Average ACT scores would go up - - - - - - 5.5 points
  • Average IQ would go up - - - - - - - - - - - - 7.4 points, (this is how much only 13% of the population in drags down IQ scores) This would put the U.S. 3rd in the world tied with Japan
  • Average SAT scores would go up almost - - - 100 points
  • The average income for Americans would go up over $20,000 a year

Blacks are major users of subsidies from the rest of the taxpaying population. This burden (some of which used to help blacks reproduce more blacks) would be lifted from the rest of the population

The effect on cities would be profound. All of the predominantly black cities from Detroit to East St Louis to Baltimore to Atlantic City, Wilmington Deleware -- every city would experience an immediate and radical improvement. 

Blacks as a Civilizational Threat

Blacks are a civilizational threat to any area, any city, and they seek to infiltrate white cities and countries because they have no ability to create functional societies, as I cover in the article What Happens When Blacks Take Over Management of Cities and Countries from Whites? Therefore, blacks need to infiltrate a society or city that is already built up by another group -- with the inevitable outcome that the area is ruined when a sufficient number of blacks are present.


Jim Crow laws were a good thing for several reasons.

Number one, blacks ruin areas that are nice that whites have built up. Jim Crow laws restricted blacks to live in black areas. Blacks state this was a horrible crime, but why is it a horrible crime to make blacks live around other blacks?

Number two, black areas under Jim Crow were politically run by whites.

Blacks have a weak competence level in running any city, state, or country. This is obvious by looking at any black-run US city. In each case, that city went into a severe decline.

Having whites-run societies where blacks live run by whites improves life for blacks. If this were not true, then blacks living in black-run countries and cities would not dream of moving to towns and countries that are run by whites. The same factor is at play either inside or outside the US. This has been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt in South Africa and Zimbabwe. After the government control was turned over to blacks, not only the lives of whites but the lives of blacks went into a steep decline. In both cases, these countries had ceaseless problems with maintaining infrastructure, currency value, and all the hallmarks of civilization.