The Negative Outcomes of Female Dominated Socities
Executive Summary
- Women’s modality of thought has become dominant in the US, Europe, and many other white societies.
- This article shows what happens when women’s modality of thought is dominant.
Introduction
Rape is taken very seriously in white countries.
Feminists, in particular, exaggerate the frequency of rape in white countries and have made ridiculous claims about rape, including the hypothesis that it has zero to do with sex and is 100% about power. This is one of many examples of the irrational pattern running through female thinking.
What is particularly curious is seeing what happens to the interpretation of rape when non-whites perform rape and how feminists have an unlimited propensity to turn a blind eye to evidence that does not lead to politically correct conclusions.
Our References
See this link if you want to see our references for this article and other related Brightwork articles at this link.
The Problematic Behavior and Patterns of the Most Coddled Generation
The best way to begin this article is by viewing the appearance of Professor Jonathan Haidt in Real Time With Bill Maher. The relevant part of the video for this article stops at the 6-minute 37-second mark.
Bill Maher (DNC robot and brainless liberal meathead) and this professor hit the nail on the head regarding the outcomes. In this discussion, both focus a lot of their blame on social media, leaving women off the hook. They discuss unruly children, but they do not draw a correlation to highly permissive parenting — which is nearly entirely the domain of women.
I provide evidence that single mothers usually have the most permissive parenting and poorly behaved children. This is because there are no males, and the female parenting preference dominates.
Make Father’s Day a Second Mother’s Day?
This same modality exists in families with both parents, but the male is feminized, and the female is running the house. This is most apparent in black families, the racial group in the US that has gone the furthest in undermining men and has the lowest participation of males in child-rearing. Blacks have around 72% of their children born to unmarried women, the highest in the US. (the black community does not celebrate Father’s Day and likes to call it a “second Mother’s Day). Based on black outcomes, intelligence, and behavior, blacks do the worst job parenting any racial group in the US.
If the US were all black, it would have at the very least the following – based upon dividing 100% of the population by 13.4% that is black, arriving at a multiple of 7.4 to multiply these figures:
- 3.87x as many homicides.
- 6.4x as much drug-related crime.
- 5.18x as much overall violence.
And if the US were 100% black, it would have black policing and a black judiciary, which — if Africa is our guide — is at a much lower standard than policing and a judiciary with a solid white component and based upon European standards so that the numbers might be worse.
So why is anyone copying the black parenting modality, which includes absent men, undermined men by “strong black women” and high levels of out-of-wedlock birth, as well as a culture of baby mommas and baby daddies, with women having children from multiple black men?
Asians in the US, on the other hand, not whites, have the lowest percentage of children born to unwed mothers.
Lessons in Ineffective Parenting from the Show Supernanny
Liberalism and female lead households are exposed for their ineffectiveness in the show Supernanny. In each family where women dominate, discipline is significantly reduced, and chaos reigns.
Supernanny is a show where a very experienced nanny comes to parents’ homes with poorly behaved children and teaches them how to be better parents. What the show does not address is what is obvious: families that are feminized lead to terrible outcomes, as women are all about empathy and discipline. A nation of families either led by single women or with two parents, but where the family is feminized leads to chaos in parenting. When one thinks of female leadership, one should think of the outcomes of Baltimore or Oakland.
When a male is present, a feature of these families is a feminized man who refuses to provide discipline. A significant reason for feminized men is that women undermine men’s roles as disciplinarians.
Does 100% Male Dominated Parenting Lead to Good Outcomes?
The lowest intelligence societies in the world are Muslim, which are dominated by men.
Only 10 Muslims in history have ever won a Nobel Prize; five of these are for peace — so they are not intellectual Nobel Prizes, and only three have won for science. Of those three, two won with the assistance of living in the US and doing their research in the US.
It’s doubtful these Muslim men could have won a Nobel Prize while living in a Muslim country. They are complete alterations.
That makes the total of a single Nobel Prize in science won by a Muslim living in a Muslim country at the time.
- That is out of a world population of 1.7 billion.
- Canada, a country of what until recently 25 million (now only recently exploded to 37 million due to out-of-control non-white immigration), has 33 Nobel Prizes.
Examples of the Overlap Between WOKE Permissiveness, Parenting, and Social Outcomes
As feminine modalities have become increasingly dominant in Western countries, WOKEness has dramatically increased. WOKEness is an extension of PC and can be considered extreme PC. It also overlaps with breaking down white societies to make them more amenable to non-whites and undermine white men.
How Feminists Adhere to WOKE Groupthink
MS Magazine and feminism, in general, is “WOKE,” which means “culturally sensitive.”
- It means blaming white societies and holding them accountable while being silent in non-white societies.
- It means being progressive enough to state that honor killings are (if I created a synopsis of various quotes, it would look something like this)…
“How one culture’s fathers deals with young women who apostate (reject Islam), and that is ok and we need to be sensitive to it, or at the very least ignore it.”
And this extends to non-whites living in white countries.
How Black Women Have Been Struggling to Blame Overall Society and Call It Racism
US blacks have been struggling to figure out a way to blame their cultural problems with rape on the broader white community. They have not found a successful strategy to do this. One of the ways they hide the high levels of assault by black men is by declaring their assaults but by being very careful, never to mention the race of the person who assaulted them.
Their preference obviously would be to be able to point the finger at other races for attacking them and then discuss how this is due to endemic white supremacy, which would allow for race scamming.
The only problem with this is that it is very infrequent for other races to rape or even harass black women. However, it is widespread for black men to assault white women sexually.
Oprah is Interested in Accusations of Sexual Assault — If the Perpetrator is White
When Oprah Winfrey began producing a documentary on the rape allegations against Russell Simmons, she was threatened by many in the black community as it reinforced “racial stereotypes” about black men. She was told not to embarrass the black community by bringing down a powerful black man, and Oprah promptly cratered to the pressure and removed her name from the documentary.
Southwest Airlines and WOKE Insanity
These quotes describe the WOKE undisciplined insanity that is undermining white-originated societies. These are quotes from the changing work environment at a specific airline, but they permeate Western societies. These quotes are from an article in The Epoch Times.
Issue #1: Turning Southwest Airlines into WOKE Enforcement
But eight current Southwest employees, including three minorities, told The Epoch Times that “woke, leftist” DEI policies, as implemented, have tarnished the cherished Golden Rule principle, fractured a once-cohesive workforce, and, ultimately, may put safety at risk.
Faced with pandemic-related staffing shortages and pressure to add minorities, the company has changed the way it hires, trains, and disciplines workers—mostly to benefit less-qualified new hires representing the diversity rainbow, the employees say.
The US has moved away from merit-based hiring to WOKE diverse hiring. This is the same thing that happened in South Africa after blacks took over, and blacks who knew the right replaced whites with far more capabilities. No black-run nation or city has ever developed the idea of merit — everything runs based on tribal affiliation.
Women in white societies generally support WOKE diversity hiring. However, there is something most of them don’t know — non-white societies do not function based on merit or ideas of merit.
Ahhhhh…..Wonderful Subsaharan Africa
This is how blacks behave in Africa — everything is along tribal lines. Not to say that the best-qualified person always gets the job in white-originated societies, but white societies were the only ones to develop the idea of a merit-based society. Whites hire Indians who immigrate to white-originated societies on merit but then begin hiring Indians based on tribal affiliation. White societies can not be meritocracies if they have substantial non-white populations that only work on tribal hiring.
As soon as one group, like Indians, begins only hiring Indians, it breaks the trust in the system, and then all other groups eventually will move away from meritocracy and push for their family and friends to be considered for jobs. Non-whites are currently arguing for hiring based on diversity – which allows more of them to be hired, getting around white merit rules. However, once hired, whites will find they will never accept merit. Diversity will be promoted until whites are pushed out of companies. As is stated, the NBA scores very high for diversity, and the NBA is over 95% white. Diversity does not mean diversity; it is code for removing whites and replacing them with non-whites.
Issue #2: Turning Southwest Airlines into WOKE Enforcement
Minorities or people with leftist political views, varying gender identities, and alternative sexual orientations appear to be given wide latitude. This “protected class” is allowed to bend or break rules, and new hires in these classifications may be given extra chances to pass required skills tests, the employees said.
At the same time, veteran workers—especially those who are white, heterosexual, and conservative—find themselves in the crosshairs for almost anything, including making a personal statement of religious or political beliefs, the Southwest workers said. Even minorities can be shifted into this targeted group if they espouse personal beliefs running counter to causes that the company supports.
One of her colleagues said: “The company is trying to eliminate anybody who does not agree with their agenda. The last few years, anybody who speaks up against them, they want gone.” That flight attendant said she had no problems at work until she posted her Christian religious beliefs on her personal Facebook page, along with her support of President Donald Trump. A coworker reported the posts to Southwest, and the flight attendant said she has faced repercussions ever since.
The company supported the union’s political activism, Carter’s suit says, by accommodating work-shift changes for union members so they could participate in the Women’s March on Washington, D.C., in January 2017. Marchers were protesting Trump’s inauguration; one of the primary sponsors of the event was Planned Parenthood. Southwest also showed “solidarity” with the protesters by bathing its airplane cabins in pink lights on some D.C.-bound flights, Carter’s lawsuit says.
But corporate leadership and philosophy shifted. Carter said, her former coworkers tell her the culture is now one where people are fired on a whim, and they’re encouraged to file complaints against each other over perceived insults, such as failure to use the “preferred pronoun” of a person asserting an alternative gender identity.
The flight attendants describe feeling as though a backstabber is always ready to pounce, to report any action or statement that doesn’t fit the corporate ideology. They’re being held to strict conduct and uniform standards while “accommodations” are extended to people in protected classes, such as a minority woman who was allowed to wear a nose ring—which got a white female in trouble—and a male flight attendant who described himself as “nonbinary”—neither totally male nor totally female—being allowed to wear a skirt that appeared to be shorter than regulations allowed.
The nonbinary employee seemed to be using his position at the airline as a platform for LGBTQ activism and self-promotion, rather than focusing on benefiting the company or its customers, fellow flight attendants said. They shared screenshots of the nonbinary employee’s social media posts. One is a selfie of the mustached man posing in his Southwest uniform, with the comment, “My dress looks better on me than most chicks.”
Those quotes don’t sound like an airline based in a white-originated country. The US is becoming more tribal and like a third-world nation, which means that is the US’s direction regarding competency and effectiveness. LGBTQ and using pink lights to support women’s marches, retaliation against other political views. These are all tribes — and tribal affiliation is now being placed above merit. Women are far more likely to support these things; however, women do not consider that this “tolerance” results in accepting factions.
None of these things has anything to do with Southwest Airlines running an efficient airline. They run counter to running an efficient airline. They also run counter to white society in that they push tribal affiliation above job performance — and hence, they are anti-white ideals.
Issue #3: Turning Southwest Airlines into WOKE Enforcement
It used to be unusual to see flight attendants behave in ways that brought embarrassment to their coworkers. Now, quite a few of the new hires who were prized for their diversity “are rather risqué,” a flight attendant said. “They become very emboldened; they feel they can get away with this because they are in a protected class.”
Still, Southwest has had to fire employees who pushed the envelope too far, including one minority flight attendant who solicited sex in a social media video and another who videoed herself twerking. In both instances, the videos, provided to the Epoch Times, show the employees in Southwest uniforms.
The female response to this is to “show empathy.” However, it means that standards go into decline. Women’s empathy ends up being used against the entire society and to degrade standards, then women’s empathy is negative.
Issue #4: The Work Ethic of Those Raised Under Permissive Female Parenting
While seeing a decline in the flight attendants who seem to be truly vested in their work, the flight attendants say the company is directing them to merely “inform” passengers about violations of safety rules, not to enforce the rules.
“We’re allowing customers to do as they please, and it’s causing safety issues,” a flight attendant said. People are refusing to remain seated during takeoffs and landings, for example. If something goes amiss, “You become a projectile; you can hurt other people,” the flight attendant added.
She doesn’t see that same level of grit from the new hires. “They don’t have the same tough mentality,” she said. Nor do they have the same work ethic, which might be attributable to differences between the younger and older generations.
The older flight attendant described being busy from the beginning to the end of each flight while many of the new hires tend to just serve one round of drink orders, “then they go back to the back (of the airplane) and sit down for the rest of the flight.”
Recently, our flight attendant couldn’t even read off the pre flight instruction card.
She dropped a large tray in flight and announced “Welcome to Atlanta” when we arrived in Dallas.
I wondered what benefit she would be in a crisis situation.
Cleary a quota checkoff over public safety!
Several issues combine to provide this outcome.
First, the US is becoming increasingly non-white and doing so at an amazingly rapid rate. All of these non-whites, at some point, immigrated from countries where the standards of behavior are lower and from less capable countries.
A second factor is that female-dominated permissive parenting leads to reduced behavior standards. Rather than getting effective parenting, many or most adults now exit their childhood with far lower functioning than previous generations.
Conclusion
Somewhere along the line, women in Western societies were told and came to believe that they were smarter than men, that they should make all the decisions, and that their way of setting up a society must be dominant and superior to males.
This results in high levels of permissiveness and eventually leads to those countries being invaded by other groups that turn that society against the descendants of those who created the society in the first place.
With women running the show, parenting becomes about indulgence and permissiveness. The output is dysfunctional children and adults because, under the rule of women, no discipline is necessary, only “empathy.” Societies run by female ways of thought have dysfunctional children and are invaded and taken over by barbarians. Those barbarians can take the form of poorly raised children under a female-centric parenting modality, immigrants from barbaric cultures, or children of immigrants from barbaric cultures.
Other Interesting References
More from Professor Haidt can be found in the following video.
The Supernannies
Nannies trained to be the best are not just pushovers who apply a modern, feminine concept of undisciplined childcare.
Sharing This Article
Share this article with a friend or family member by copying this article link and pasting it into your email so they can read the same information.